On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:19:25 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

Here, you owe me an apology:

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:30:46 -0800 (PST),

wrote:

I owe you an apology for something justwaitafrekinmin... wrote?

On Nov 2, 2:40*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:19:25 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker

wrote:
Here, you owe me an apology:

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:30:46 -0800 (PST),

wrote:

I owe you an apology for something justwaitafrekinmin... wrote?

He didn't write it. YOU did. If you're too lame to admit you said it
and apologize, then so be it. You are a TRUE reverse Harry.

On Nov 2, 2:40*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:19:25 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker

wrote:
Here, you owe me an apology:

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:30:46 -0800 (PST),

wrote:

I owe you an apology for something justwaitafrekinmin... wrote?

Here, here's the direct link to YOUR post. I know you won't apologize,
Harry's not good at it neither.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...39ca401c49e499

On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:45:38 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Nov 2, 2:40*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:19:25 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker

wrote:
Here, you owe me an apology:

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:30:46 -0800 (PST),

wrote:

I owe you an apology for something justwaitafrekinmin... wrote?

He didn't write it. YOU did. If you're too lame to admit you said it
and apologize, then so be it. You are a TRUE reverse Harry.

Loogy, the message you posted started with, "On Sun, 18 Jan 2009
11:30:46 -0800 wrote:

Now, the way I see it, you copied something Scotty wrote and are
attempting to attribute same to me.

And, the example you sited has nothing to do with using mistakes made
by Bush to justify the **** ups of O'bama.

You are simply demonstrating an inability to understand the concept of
the 'Bush Rationale'.

On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:48:26 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Nov 2, 2:40*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:19:25 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker

wrote:
Here, you owe me an apology:

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:30:46 -0800 (PST),

wrote:

I owe you an apology for something justwaitafrekinmin... wrote?

Here, here's the direct link to YOUR post. I know you won't apologize,
Harry's not good at it neither.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...39ca401c49e499

That's better. That would seem to indicate that I wrote the message.
Now what the hell does that have to do with the Bush Rationale for
Obama's ****ups?

On Nov 2, 3:28*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:48:26 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Nov 2, 2:40*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:19:25 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker

wrote:
Here, you owe me an apology:

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:30:46 -0800 (PST),

wrote:

I owe you an apology for something justwaitafrekinmin... wrote?

Here, here's the direct link to YOUR post. I know you won't apologize,
Harry's not good at it neither.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...thread/6f6b531...

That's better. That would seem to indicate that I wrote the message.
Now what the hell does that have to do with the Bush Rationale for
Obama's ****ups?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

As suspected. But what *I* said was "John, you have said so here many
times that Bush can't be blamed for
the economy because Obama's on watch now. So, if Obama has to take the
heat for everything, even when the economy really went in the tank
when Bush was president, wouldn't it then be that everything that
happened when Bush was president was HIS fault? Or is there a double
standard?

To which you answered:

Cite? I didn't think so.-

And I gave you a cite. But Harry doesn't apologize for his wrongs,
either.

On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:02:59 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Nov 2, 3:28*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:48:26 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Nov 2, 2:40*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:19:25 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker

wrote:
Here, you owe me an apology:

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:30:46 -0800 (PST),

wrote:

I owe you an apology for something justwaitafrekinmin... wrote?

Here, here's the direct link to YOUR post. I know you won't apologize,
Harry's not good at it neither.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...thread/6f6b531...

That's better. That would seem to indicate that I wrote the message.
Now what the hell does that have to do with the Bush Rationale for
Obama's ****ups?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

As suspected. But what *I* said was "John, you have said so here many
times that Bush can't be blamed for
the economy because Obama's on watch now. So, if Obama has to take the
heat for everything, even when the economy really went in the tank
when Bush was president, wouldn't it then be that everything that
happened when Bush was president was HIS fault? Or is there a double
standard?

To which you answered:

Cite? I didn't think so.-

And I gave you a cite. But Harry doesn't apologize for his wrongs,
either.

You didn't give a cite showing anything I said about Bush and the
economy. You presented a site showing a comment about porta potties -
which is where Obama's taking the economy.

Come on Loogy, you can do better than that.

Don White wrote:
"Stevie" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Stevie" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"TJ" ""tj\"@florida,com" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:

A week ago The Freak was apologizing to Slammer. Now he's throwing
nasty digs again.
What a little twerp.


If anyone would know about nasty little digs, it would be you. You're
just a harry puppet dressed in flannel. Brrrr Shivvver. Just thinking
of you trying to survive up in that frozen wasteland gives me the
chills.


It's no country for girliemen.
Let's see a picture of your manly boat...if you have a boat.

-S


I posted more than enough pictures last year.
Alzheimers kicking in?
Sold it, eh?

-S


Why so interesred...I doubt you could afford to buy it if it was for sale.



I'm not the least bit "interesred" in buying your boat. If I was, I
could cover the cost with the money I dropped under the seat of my car.

-S

"Stevie" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Stevie" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Stevie" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"TJ" ""tj\"@florida,com" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:

A week ago The Freak was apologizing to Slammer. Now he's throwing
nasty digs again.
What a little twerp.


If anyone would know about nasty little digs, it would be you.
You're just a harry puppet dressed in flannel. Brrrr Shivvver. Just
thinking of you trying to survive up in that frozen wasteland gives
me the chills.


It's no country for girliemen.
Let's see a picture of your manly boat...if you have a boat.

-S


I posted more than enough pictures last year.
Alzheimers kicking in?
Sold it, eh?

-S


Why so interesred...I doubt you could afford to buy it if it was for
sale.

I'm not the least bit "interesred" in buying your boat. If I was, I could
cover the cost with the money I dropped under the seat of my car.

-S


Dealing dope, are we?

Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"TJ"""tj\"@florida,com" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:

A week ago The Freak was apologizing to Slammer. Now he's throwing
nasty digs again.
What a little twerp.


If anyone would know about nasty little digs, it would be you.
You're just a harry puppet dressed in flannel. Brrrr Shivvver. Just
thinking of you trying to survive up in that frozen wasteland gives
me the chills.


It's no country for girliemen.
Let's see a picture of your manly boat...if you have a boat.

-S


I posted more than enough pictures last year.
Alzheimers kicking in?
Sold it, eh?

-S


Why so interesred...I doubt you could afford to buy it if it was for
sale.

I'm not the least bit "interesred" in buying your boat. If I was, I could
cover the cost with the money I dropped under the seat of my car.

-S


Dealing dope, are we?



"We"? No. I don't know where you get your beer money.

-S