On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:34:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 23, 6:47 am, H the K wrote:
On 10/23/09 6:38 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

President Nixon's behavior before he went off the deep end?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us...l?_r=2&partner...

A little early though.

Kinda reminds me of your behavior here since last November, eh?

Considering Obama is unable to function without adulation, not
praising him should be considered unpatriotic.


Is that why he's taking time to make a decision about Afganistan and not
forcefully weighing in about the public option for healthcare reform?

LMAO! That was a good one. 'Taking time to make a decision....'.
Right! lol!

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:34:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 23, 6:47 am, H the K wrote:
On 10/23/09 6:38 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

President Nixon's behavior before he went off the deep end?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us...l?_r=2&partner...

A little early though.

Kinda reminds me of your behavior here since last November, eh?

Considering Obama is unable to function without adulation, not
praising him should be considered unpatriotic.


Is that why he's taking time to make a decision about Afganistan and not
forcefully weighing in about the public option for healthcare reform?

LMAO! That was a good one. 'Taking time to make a decision....'.
Right! lol!


Well, it's a welcome change from Cheney, I mean Bush.

--
Nom=de=Plume

In article ,
says...

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:34:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 23, 6:47 am, H the K wrote:
On 10/23/09 6:38 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

President Nixon's behavior before he went off the deep end?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us...l?_r=2&partner...

A little early though.

Kinda reminds me of your behavior here since last November, eh?

Considering Obama is unable to function without adulation, not
praising him should be considered unpatriotic.


Is that why he's taking time to make a decision about Afganistan and not
forcefully weighing in about the public option for healthcare reform?

LMAO! That was a good one. 'Taking time to make a decision....'.
Right! lol!


Well, it's a welcome change from Cheney, I mean Bush.

I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would agree..

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:34:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 23, 6:47 am, H the K wrote:
On 10/23/09 6:38 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

President Nixon's behavior before he went off the deep end?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us...l?_r=2&partner...

A little early though.

Kinda reminds me of your behavior here since last November, eh?

Considering Obama is unable to function without adulation, not
praising him should be considered unpatriotic.


Is that why he's taking time to make a decision about Afganistan and
not
forcefully weighing in about the public option for healthcare reform?

LMAO! That was a good one. 'Taking time to make a decision....'.
Right! lol!


Well, it's a welcome change from Cheney, I mean Bush.

I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would agree..


I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would think Bush did the right
thing to begin with. Perhaps if Cheney keeps saying it over and over, that
the Iraq war was justified, it might become a fact.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:00:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:34:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 23, 6:47 am, H the K wrote:
On 10/23/09 6:38 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

President Nixon's behavior before he went off the deep end?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us...l?_r=2&partner...

A little early though.

Kinda reminds me of your behavior here since last November, eh?

Considering Obama is unable to function without adulation, not
praising him should be considered unpatriotic.


Is that why he's taking time to make a decision about Afganistan and
not
forcefully weighing in about the public option for healthcare reform?

LMAO! That was a good one. 'Taking time to make a decision....'.
Right! lol!


Well, it's a welcome change from Cheney, I mean Bush.

I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would agree..


I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would think Bush did the right
thing to begin with. Perhaps if Cheney keeps saying it over and over, that
the Iraq war was justified, it might become a fact.

lol

Then why didn't 'Bama bring them home?

Never mind.

Are you saying your eyes are pink?

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:00:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:34:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 23, 6:47 am, H the K wrote:
On 10/23/09 6:38 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

President Nixon's behavior before he went off the deep end?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us...l?_r=2&partner...

A little early though.

Kinda reminds me of your behavior here since last November, eh?

Considering Obama is unable to function without adulation, not
praising him should be considered unpatriotic.


Is that why he's taking time to make a decision about Afganistan and
not
forcefully weighing in about the public option for healthcare reform?

LMAO! That was a good one. 'Taking time to make a decision....'.
Right! lol!


Well, it's a welcome change from Cheney, I mean Bush.

I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would agree..


I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would think Bush did the right
thing to begin with. Perhaps if Cheney keeps saying it over and over, that
the Iraq war was justified, it might become a fact.

lol

Then why didn't 'Bama bring them home?

Never mind.

Are you saying your eyes are pink?

Obama took pandering to a whole new level leading up to the election.
Sometimes saying two completely different things in one day. To bad the
minority media chose to ignore it. Health care, bailouts, and Government
motors are all just a warm up for Cap and Tax...

Bend over, change is coming.

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:00:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:34:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 23, 6:47 am, H the K wrote:
On 10/23/09 6:38 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

President Nixon's behavior before he went off the deep end?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us...l?_r=2&partner...

A little early though.

Kinda reminds me of your behavior here since last November, eh?

Considering Obama is unable to function without adulation, not
praising him should be considered unpatriotic.


Is that why he's taking time to make a decision about Afganistan
and
not
forcefully weighing in about the public option for healthcare
reform?

LMAO! That was a good one. 'Taking time to make a decision....'.
Right! lol!


Well, it's a welcome change from Cheney, I mean Bush.

I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would agree..


I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would think Bush did the right
thing to begin with. Perhaps if Cheney keeps saying it over and over,
that
the Iraq war was justified, it might become a fact.

lol

Then why didn't 'Bama bring them home?

Never mind.

Are you saying your eyes are pink?

Obama took pandering to a whole new level leading up to the election.
Sometimes saying two completely different things in one day. To bad the
minority media chose to ignore it. Health care, bailouts, and Government
motors are all just a warm up for Cap and Tax...


Please cite specifics... nah, don't bother, you can't.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:00:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:34:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 23, 6:47 am, H the K wrote:
On 10/23/09 6:38 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

President Nixon's behavior before he went off the deep end?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us...l?_r=2&partner...

A little early though.

Kinda reminds me of your behavior here since last November, eh?

Considering Obama is unable to function without adulation, not
praising him should be considered unpatriotic.


Is that why he's taking time to make a decision about Afganistan and
not
forcefully weighing in about the public option for healthcare reform?

LMAO! That was a good one. 'Taking time to make a decision....'.
Right! lol!


Well, it's a welcome change from Cheney, I mean Bush.

I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would agree..


I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would think Bush did the right
thing to begin with. Perhaps if Cheney keeps saying it over and over, that
the Iraq war was justified, it might become a fact.

lol

Then why didn't 'Bama bring them home?

Never mind.

Are you saying your eyes are pink?


I guess you missed the news. I'm sure it won't be on Fox.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:39:50 -0400, Tosk wrote:


Is that why he's taking time to make a decision about Afganistan and
not forcefully weighing in about the public option for healthcare
reform?

LMAO! That was a good one. 'Taking time to make a decision....'.
Right! lol!


Well, it's a welcome change from Cheney, I mean Bush.

I doubt the guys getting blown to pieces would agree..

Nothing for nothing, but whatever he decides, it won't be of any import
until next spring. As you know, winter weather pretty much shuts down
Afghanistan. If Obama does decide to send more troops, they won't be
needed until the weather moderates in the spring.