|
Timmy to the rescue.
Poor timmy...he cant get his point across here and win. He now cums to
the aid (s) of the FAGGOT PRINCE, SCOTTY INGERSOLL. Will he be the first to poke the ole' lady, ****face? Nawwwww. How many weekends will he spend with your Daughter in the tent? None....she only likes "daddy the FAGGOT" Will he help you fix your run-down hillbilly porch? How many others are lined-up for the FAGGOTS "ole' lady" already...hmmmmmmm lets see 1. Top Bass Dog (or Douchebag, or rimmer ) 2. John Adolf Herring (a stupid, "educated" man) 3. Tiny timmy (who's doing DOUBLE-duty, he'll get thirds, AND fourths) ...........................wow, the list is growing. Better REALLY grease up the "ole' lady" for the night of nights. Poor timmy now also has to join in the cross-polution of another NG, for the sake of the COCKSUCKER, SCOTTY INGERSOLL. Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. |
Timmy to the rescue.
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote: Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. There won't be a next - that's enough. There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your Federal authorities. Just drop it. |
Timmy to the rescue.
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:46:13 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. There won't be a next - that's enough. There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your Federal authorities. Just drop it. At this point, it would seem that the whole campaign shows signs of serious emotional and mental instability. It's wasted energy. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Timmy to the rescue.
|
Timmy to the rescue.
On Oct 21, 2:46*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. There won't be a next - that's enough. There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your Federal authorities. Just drop it. Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats don't phase me, Tom. |
Timmy to the rescue.
On Oct 21, 5:50*pm, Scott Dickson wrote:
On Oct 21, 2:46*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. There won't be a next - that's enough. There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your Federal authorities. Just drop it. Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats don't phase me, Tom. Perhaps when the authorities with proper jourisdiction knock on your door, Dickster, that will "phase" you. When you disappear here, we will know that you have received the knock on the door. All the best, Dickster. Yours always, GC Boater |
Timmy to the rescue.
On Oct 21, 9:05*pm, GC Boater wrote:
On Oct 21, 5:50*pm, Scott Dickson wrote: On Oct 21, 2:46*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. There won't be a next - that's enough. There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your Federal authorities. Just drop it. Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats don't phase me, Tom. Perhaps when the authorities with proper jourisdiction knock on your door, Dickster, that will "phase" you. *When you disappear here, we will know that you have received the knock on the door. All the best, Dickster. Yours always, GC Boater That's a laugh. There have been no "definate " threats of any kind. Better study some law. I've beaten Lawyers in Court. You just have to have the correct "ammo". You're very vain, and naive. |
Timmy to the rescue.
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson
wrote: On Oct 21, 2:46*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. There won't be a next - that's enough. There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your Federal authorities. Just drop it. Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats don't phase me, Tom. It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was a one-off. And the person deserved it. Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to deal with it. What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had thier access pulled for similar speech - take note. I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight. Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology" - you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it. So just drop it. |
Timmy to the rescue.
|
Timmy to the rescue.
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk
wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: On Oct 21, 2:46*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. There won't be a next - that's enough. There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your Federal authorities. Just drop it. Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats don't phase me, Tom. It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was a one-off. And the person deserved it. Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to deal with it. What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had thier access pulled for similar speech - take note. I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight. Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology" - you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it. So just drop it. I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of the bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group... Funny how these things work out. :) |
Timmy to the rescue.
|
Timmy to the rescue.
"HK" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. There won't be a next - that's enough. There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your Federal authorities. Just drop it. Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats don't phase me, Tom. It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was a one-off. And the person deserved it. Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to deal with it. What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had thier access pulled for similar speech - take note. I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight. Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology" - you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it. So just drop it. I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of the bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group... Funny how these things work out. :) Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash. It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions. If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants would be my 1st ruling.. |
Timmy to the rescue.
On Oct 22, 10:06*am, "Don White" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. There won't be a next - that's enough. There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your Federal authorities. Just drop it. Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats don't phase me, Tom. It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was a one-off. *And the person deserved it. Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. *Frankly, I don't give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to deal with it. What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good people to your little diatribes. *You seem to think you are totally and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm pointing that out to you. *If others want to take action, all it takes is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and your location, ISP, etc., will be known. *Other Canadians have had thier access pulled for similar speech - take note. I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight. |
Timmy to the rescue.
|
Timmy to the rescue.
Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. There won't be a next - that's enough. There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your Federal authorities. Just drop it. Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats don't phase me, Tom. It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was a one-off. And the person deserved it. Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to deal with it. What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had thier access pulled for similar speech - take note. I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight. Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology" - you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it. So just drop it. I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of the bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group... Funny how these things work out. :) Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash. It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions. If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants would be my 1st ruling.. I thought boats was the topic. Why do we need combatants to discuss boats? |
Timmy to the rescue.
"Jim" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. There won't be a next - that's enough. There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your Federal authorities. Just drop it. Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats don't phase me, Tom. It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was a one-off. And the person deserved it. Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to deal with it. What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had thier access pulled for similar speech - take note. I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight. Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology" - you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it. So just drop it. I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of the bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group... Funny how these things work out. :) Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash. It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions. If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants would be my 1st ruling.. I thought boats was the topic. Why do we need combatants to discuss boats? In a perfect world, where we could banish the likes of you and the other agitators, maybe boats could be discussed in a civil manner. |
Timmy to the rescue.
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:21:56 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote: Stopped over here at Google a couple of times in the last few days and see that you and Harry are prancing around chasing my posts and picking fights from under your desks, nothing changes... You have no moral ground, now get back to spell checking and mis-spelling words all in the same post dummy... Dude - you just got through with one ****ing contest - why do you want to continue another? Do what you do in real life - you don't get along with somebody, just ignore them and move on. Does wonders for the psyche. :) |
Timmy to the rescue.
Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. There won't be a next - that's enough. There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your Federal authorities. Just drop it. Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats don't phase me, Tom. It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was a one-off. And the person deserved it. Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to deal with it. What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had thier access pulled for similar speech - take note. I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight. Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology" - you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it. So just drop it. I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of the bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group... Funny how these things work out. :) Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash. It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions. If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants would be my 1st ruling.. I thought boats was the topic. Why do we need combatants to discuss boats? In a perfect world, where we could banish the likes of you and the other agitators, maybe boats could be discussed in a civil manner. You are Krauses little lapdog. He says something rude and you start yapping away in agreement like a good little puppy. In a perfect world, Krause would be put away and you would be put up for adoption. |
Timmy to the rescue.
On Oct 22, 11:09*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:21:56 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: Stopped over here at Google a couple of times in the last few days and see that you and Harry are prancing around chasing my posts and picking fights from under your desks, nothing changes... You have no moral ground, now get back to spell checking and mis-spelling words all in the same post dummy... Dude - you just got through with one ****ing contest - why do you want to continue another? Do what you do in real life - you don't get along with somebody, just ignore them and move on. Does wonders for the psyche. *:) Well, I happended to be on a machine where I access with Google and see your buddie Donnie chasing me around the floor like a cat toy. Seems I have been leaving Donnie alone for quite a while since no one really repost his tripe past my filters, but apparently, he is still taking pot shots and has been right along... Just sayin'... Either way, I will be back on gravity soon enough... |
Timmy to the rescue.
"Jim" wrote I thought boats was the topic. Why do we need combatants to discuss boats? You musta not been at some of the boat launches I've been to. ;-) Steve |
Timmy to the rescue.
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:06:21 -0300, "Don White"
wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. There won't be a next - that's enough. There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your Federal authorities. Just drop it. Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats don't phase me, Tom. It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was a one-off. And the person deserved it. Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to deal with it. What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had thier access pulled for similar speech - take note. I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight. Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology" - you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it. So just drop it. I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of the bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group... Funny how these things work out. :) Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash. It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions. If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants would be my 1st ruling.. How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know. |
Timmy to the rescue.
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:37:07 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote: "Jim" wrote I thought boats was the topic. Why do we need combatants to discuss boats? You musta not been at some of the boat launches I've been to. ;-) Steve LOL! |
Timmy to the rescue.
"John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:06:21 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. There won't be a next - that's enough. There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your Federal authorities. Just drop it. Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats don't phase me, Tom. It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was a one-off. And the person deserved it. Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to deal with it. What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had thier access pulled for similar speech - take note. I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight. Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology" - you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it. So just drop it. I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of the bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group... Funny how these things work out. :) Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash. It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions. If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants would be my 1st ruling.. How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know. So you think it's 'ok' to trash family members? |
Timmy to the rescue.
Don White wrote:
It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions. If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants would be my 1st ruling.. How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know. So you think it's 'ok' to trash family members? I have been lurking, but I noticed you have been high fiving some idiot (HK) who accuses someone having sex with their preteen daughter. You seem to have extremely selective standards. I don't know who is worse HK or you for making him your best buddy. |
Timmy to the rescue.
Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:06:21 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. There won't be a next - that's enough. There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your Federal authorities. Just drop it. Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats don't phase me, Tom. It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was a one-off. And the person deserved it. Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to deal with it. What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had thier access pulled for similar speech - take note. I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight. Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology" - you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it. So just drop it. I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of the bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group... Funny how these things work out. :) Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash. It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions. If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants would be my 1st ruling.. How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know. So you think it's 'ok' to trash family members? John is suggesting that all trashing stop. I should think that would make you happy. |
Timmy to the rescue.
Enter Name Here wrote:
Don White wrote: It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions. If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants would be my 1st ruling.. How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know. So you think it's 'ok' to trash family members? I have been lurking, but I noticed you have been high fiving some idiot (HK) who accuses someone having sex with their preteen daughter. You seem to have extremely selective standards. I don't know who is worse HK or you for making him your best buddy. Welcome aboard noobie. |
Timmy to the rescue.
"Enter Name Here" "Enter Email Here" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions. If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants would be my 1st ruling.. How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know. So you think it's 'ok' to trash family members? I have been lurking, but I noticed you have been high fiving some idiot (HK) who accuses someone having sex with their preteen daughter. You seem to have extremely selective standards. I don't know who is worse HK or you for making him your best buddy. Ok...which one of the Dopey Army irregulars are you? |
Timmy to the rescue.
"Jim" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:06:21 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. There won't be a next - that's enough. There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your Federal authorities. Just drop it. Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats don't phase me, Tom. It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was a one-off. And the person deserved it. Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to deal with it. What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had thier access pulled for similar speech - take note. I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight. Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology" - you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it. So just drop it. I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of the bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group... Funny how these things work out. :) Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash. It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions. If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants would be my 1st ruling.. How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know. So you think it's 'ok' to trash family members? John is suggesting that all trashing stop. I should think that would make you happy. It would...if he means what he says....therefore I'm watching him. We shall see, time will tell, the proof of the pudding is in the eating of it. Get the message? |
Timmy to the rescue.
Don White wrote:
"Enter Name Here" "Enter Email Here" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions. If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants would be my 1st ruling.. How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know. So you think it's 'ok' to trash family members? I have been lurking, but I noticed you have been high fiving some idiot (HK) who accuses someone having sex with their preteen daughter. You seem to have extremely selective standards. I don't know who is worse HK or you for making him your best buddy. Ok...which one of the Dopey Army irregulars are you? So why do you endorse someone talking about incest with their preteen daughter, but say family members should be off limits? Or do you believe only a low life would do that? |
Timmy to the rescue.
On Oct 22, 1:54*pm, John H. wrote:
How about, no trashing, perid? John, i love talking with you man, but I think I'm starting to get to you. |
Timmy to the rescue.
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:25:15 -0300, "Don White"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:06:21 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. There won't be a next - that's enough. There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your Federal authorities. Just drop it. Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats don't phase me, Tom. It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was a one-off. And the person deserved it. Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to deal with it. What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had thier access pulled for similar speech - take note. I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight. Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology" - you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it. So just drop it. I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of the bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group... Funny how these things work out. :) Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash. It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions. If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants would be my 1st ruling.. How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know. So you think it's 'ok' to trash family members? How about, NO TRASHING, period. That's what I've been trying to get you to agree to. You don't have to be an 'Exaulted Ruler' to stop ANY trashing. |
Timmy to the rescue.
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:59:48 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Oct 22, 1:54*pm, John H. wrote: How about, no trashing, perid? John, i love talking with you man, but I think I'm starting to get to you. Oh, that sounds like you're trying to break up with a girl you don't like anymore. Just admit it Tim. You don't love him anymore. Can you imagine what it's like to be married to him? Thank god you're not into gay marriage cause it's gonna be legal everywhere, soon. |
Timmy to the rescue.
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:59:48 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Oct 22, 1:54*pm, John H. wrote: How about, no trashing, perid? John, i love talking with you man, but I think I'm starting to get to you. Hey, did you get my email response. (You know, the secret stuff....) |
Timmy to the rescue.
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:06:21 -0300, "Don White"
wrote: It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions. You have to remember that whipping up emotions is what some people live for. You know who I'm talking about, we all do. Put them in the kill file, along with who ever quotes them, and the whole tone of the group changes. |
Timmy to the rescue.
On Oct 22, 4:04*pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:59:48 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 22, 1:54*pm, John H. wrote: How about, no trashing, perid? John, i love talking with you man, but I think I'm starting to get to you. Hey, did you get my email response. (You know, the secret stuff....) I haven't checked yet, but I'll do it now. My Cracker Jack Super Duper Decoder Ring doesn't go back that far. i wish I had one of those old WW2 German machines They used on their U-Boats (boating content provided) to crack the code, though. |
Timmy to the rescue.
On Oct 22, 4:04*pm, John H. wrote:
Hey, did you get my email response. (You know, the secret stuff....) Recieved and Responded. Thank you! |
Timmy to the rescue.
Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:06:21 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:48:34 -0400, Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: On Oct 21, 2:46 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT), Scott Dickson wrote: Until the next time, and the next, and the next, and the next. There won't be a next - that's enough. There are other avenues to work through - your ISP, the CHRC and your Federal authorities. Just drop it. Ingersoll started this, go tell him to ****ing "drop it". Your threats don't phase me, Tom. It's not a threat - I don't do "threats". Ok, I did once, but that was a one-off. And the person deserved it. Hey - Scott is a good friend, but this is his fight. Frankly, I don't give a rip if you want to go at it with him for what ever offense he purportedly gave you or not. You're both big boys - you and he have to deal with it. What I object to is your openly offensive headers and dragging in good people to your little diatribes. You seem to think you are totally and completely immune from any sort of action, but you are not - I'm pointing that out to you. If others want to take action, all it takes is a little header information, a few minutes with some software and your location, ISP, etc., will be known. Other Canadians have had thier access pulled for similar speech - take note. I won't because it's, and I can't emphasize this enough, not my fight. Lastly, you've made your point. You're not going to get an "apology" - you know it, I know it and everybody else knows it. So just drop it. I did as he asked and apologized, hopefully he will keep his end of the bargain... Sorry to the rest of the group... Funny how these things work out. :) Your buddy Scott Ingersoll is trash. It's one thing to be fighting among ourselves...but bringing loved ones and innocent family members into the fray really whips up the emotions. If I was Exaulted Ruler of this newsgroup, no trashing of non-combatants would be my 1st ruling.. How about, no trashing, perid? That's what I've been trying to get you to agree to. You don't have to be a ruler to stop, you know. So you think it's 'ok' to trash family members? John is suggesting that all trashing stop. I should think that would make you happy. It would...if he means what he says....therefore I'm watching him. We shall see, time will tell, the proof of the pudding is in the eating of it. Get the message? How much time has to pass before you will generously concede to stop your trash talk? Who knows. I might even join in on the pledge after a period of time when I'm certain you have stopped trashing. What message? |
Timmy to the rescue.
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:13:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Oct 22, 4:04*pm, John H. wrote: On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:59:48 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 22, 1:54*pm, John H. wrote: How about, no trashing, perid? John, i love talking with you man, but I think I'm starting to get to you. Hey, did you get my email response. (You know, the secret stuff....) I haven't checked yet, but I'll do it now. My Cracker Jack Super Duper Decoder Ring doesn't go back that far. i wish I had one of those old WW2 German machines They used on their U-Boats (boating content provided) to crack the code, though. I think that was called the Wehrmacht Enigma machine, Tim. The British eventually captured one. It was too big for a Cracker Jacks box, though. :) -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Timmy to the rescue.
wrote in message
... On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:13:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 22, 4:04 pm, John H. wrote: On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:59:48 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 22, 1:54 pm, John H. wrote: How about, no trashing, perid? John, i love talking with you man, but I think I'm starting to get to you. Hey, did you get my email response. (You know, the secret stuff....) I haven't checked yet, but I'll do it now. My Cracker Jack Super Duper Decoder Ring doesn't go back that far. i wish I had one of those old WW2 German machines They used on their U-Boats (boating content provided) to crack the code, though. I think that was called the Wehrmacht Enigma machine, Tim. The British eventually captured one. It was too big for a Cracker Jacks box, though. :) -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access "I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest." -- Nom=de=Plume |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com