| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Delicious...
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Delicious...
"Tosk" wrote in message
... In article , says... On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:51:29 -0400, Tosk wrote: After all, how can a for profit org compete with a public funded not for profit? Huh? I thought "privatization" was the cost cutting mantra of the Right. You know, how a lean mean corporation was more efficient than a bloated government agency. So, does this mean that if we eliminate private health insurance companies, and go with a single payer public option, our health cost would go down? Damn, you're turning into a Liberal. Not really, look at the success record of govt "not for profit" organizations. I would rather pay for something that works, than pay double for something that doesn't. Yup. Medicare and the VA don't work. Bummer. -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Delicious...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:34:10 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:51:29 -0400, Tosk wrote: After all, how can a for profit org compete with a public funded not for profit? Huh? I thought "privatization" was the cost cutting mantra of the Right. You know, how a lean mean corporation was more efficient than a bloated government agency. So, does this mean that if we eliminate private health insurance companies, and go with a single payer public option, our health cost would go down? Damn, you're turning into a Liberal. Not really, look at the success record of govt "not for profit" organizations. I would rather pay for something that works, than pay double for something that doesn't. Yup. Medicare and the VA don't work. Bummer. lol |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Delicious...
"jps" wrote in message
... On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:34:10 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:51:29 -0400, Tosk wrote: After all, how can a for profit org compete with a public funded not for profit? Huh? I thought "privatization" was the cost cutting mantra of the Right. You know, how a lean mean corporation was more efficient than a bloated government agency. So, does this mean that if we eliminate private health insurance companies, and go with a single payer public option, our health cost would go down? Damn, you're turning into a Liberal. Not really, look at the success record of govt "not for profit" organizations. I would rather pay for something that works, than pay double for something that doesn't. Yup. Medicare and the VA don't work. Bummer. Funny thing is that he isn't paying anything. You actually have to pay taxes to be considered a taxpayer. John seems to have devolved into typing lol a bunch of times rather than actually have a discussion. I guess he's run out of things to say. -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Delicious...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:42:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:34:10 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:51:29 -0400, Tosk wrote: After all, how can a for profit org compete with a public funded not for profit? Huh? I thought "privatization" was the cost cutting mantra of the Right. You know, how a lean mean corporation was more efficient than a bloated government agency. So, does this mean that if we eliminate private health insurance companies, and go with a single payer public option, our health cost would go down? Damn, you're turning into a Liberal. Not really, look at the success record of govt "not for profit" organizations. I would rather pay for something that works, than pay double for something that doesn't. Yup. Medicare and the VA don't work. Bummer. Funny thing is that he isn't paying anything. You actually have to pay taxes to be considered a taxpayer. John seems to have devolved into typing lol a bunch of times rather than actually have a discussion. I guess he's run out of things to say. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. lol lol You get what you deserve. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Delicious...
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:42:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:34:10 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:51:29 -0400, Tosk wrote: After all, how can a for profit org compete with a public funded not for profit? Huh? I thought "privatization" was the cost cutting mantra of the Right. You know, how a lean mean corporation was more efficient than a bloated government agency. So, does this mean that if we eliminate private health insurance companies, and go with a single payer public option, our health cost would go down? Damn, you're turning into a Liberal. Not really, look at the success record of govt "not for profit" organizations. I would rather pay for something that works, than pay double for something that doesn't. Yup. Medicare and the VA don't work. Bummer. Funny thing is that he isn't paying anything. You actually have to pay taxes to be considered a taxpayer. John seems to have devolved into typing lol a bunch of times rather than actually have a discussion. I guess he's run out of things to say. He's checking Worldnut Daily and Fox for fresh info while moving his index finger between upper and lower lips. Snotty is scouring the MN news for any fraudulent Franken activity and Jim is picking his nose or something else. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Delicious...
On 10/23/09 12:34 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... In inet, says... On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:51:29 -0400, Tosk wrote: After all, how can a for profit org compete with a public funded not for profit? Huh? I thought "privatization" was the cost cutting mantra of the Right. You know, how a lean mean corporation was more efficient than a bloated government agency. So, does this mean that if we eliminate private health insurance companies, and go with a single payer public option, our health cost would go down? Damn, you're turning into a Liberal. Not really, look at the success record of govt "not for profit" organizations. I would rather pay for something that works, than pay double for something that doesn't. Yup. Medicare and the VA don't work. Bummer. UPS and FEDEX don't work. Bummer. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Delicious...
|
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Delicious...
In article ,
says... "Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:51:29 -0400, Tosk wrote: After all, how can a for profit org compete with a public funded not for profit? Huh? I thought "privatization" was the cost cutting mantra of the Right. You know, how a lean mean corporation was more efficient than a bloated government agency. So, does this mean that if we eliminate private health insurance companies, and go with a single payer public option, our health cost would go down? Damn, you're turning into a Liberal. Not really, look at the success record of govt "not for profit" organizations. I would rather pay for something that works, than pay double for something that doesn't. Yup. Medicare and the VA don't work. Bummer. Well, I guess it depends on who is in office at the time. When it was Bush they sure didn't, that is if you listen to the chattering class. Now miraculously a 10% unemployment rate is a recovery... |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Double Delicious! | General | |||
| Delicious! | General | |||
| The irony is, well, delicious | General | |||
| What a delicious feast! | General | |||
| This is just too delicious not to comment... | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
