About Us

Jim

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:06:59 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:26:16 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:39:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:51:17 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:42:40 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:44:22 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:48 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Politicians lost their will. I agree. That would be Nixon, since
LBJ
escalated. Thus, we lost the war. Facts not bull**** of any kind.
Just like the Crusade we are on now,
That war was not going to be won.

Neither conflict is currently a crusade. That's from a different
administration. It's unclear what the outcome is going to be in
either
place.
I bet your average Iraqi or Afghani can't tell the difference, nor
can
the GIs who are getting blown up by road side bombs or in mountain
ambushes.
This is a war of necessity.

It is necessary that we *win* this war.

So saith the messiah.

What happens if he decides to leave? Will we have *lost*?

This is the messiah of change and he has demonstrated it is easy to
change his mind on things. A couple CNN polls seems to do the trick.
I think we are going to declare victory, cut and run ... at least I
hope so.

What's wrong with changing your mind about something? If you can't do
that,
you shouldn't be in charge.
Didn't we change our minds about Vietnam? Does changing your mind mean
you've 'lost'?

So, what you're saying is that if one changes one mind once, and it
doesn't
turn out the way you want, it's a bad thing to change your mind in the
future?
Where did you see me say that?

This was my last post: "Didn't we change our minds about Vietnam?
Does changing your mind mean you've 'lost'?"

You implied that it was OK for the President to change his mind,
meaning, I suppose, that the Afghanistan war is no longer one of
necessity. OK, so if we now cut and run, will we have lost?

If you want to change the subject and run, that's OK. You backed
yourself into a corner.

My question, from the last post, still stands.

Read my response to the previous post and get back to me when you understand
it.

It's understood.

Now answer the question.

Pushy little broad, eh?

nom=de=plume

"Jim" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:06:59 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:26:16 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:39:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:51:17 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:42:40 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:44:22 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:32:48 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Politicians lost their will. I agree. That would be Nixon,
since LBJ
escalated. Thus, we lost the war. Facts not bull**** of any
kind.
Just like the Crusade we are on now,
That war was not going to be won.

Neither conflict is currently a crusade. That's from a different
administration. It's unclear what the outcome is going to be in
either
place.
I bet your average Iraqi or Afghani can't tell the difference,
nor can
the GIs who are getting blown up by road side bombs or in
mountain
ambushes.
This is a war of necessity.

It is necessary that we *win* this war.

So saith the messiah.

What happens if he decides to leave? Will we have *lost*?

This is the messiah of change and he has demonstrated it is easy to
change his mind on things. A couple CNN polls seems to do the
trick.
I think we are going to declare victory, cut and run ... at least I
hope so.

What's wrong with changing your mind about something? If you can't
do
that,
you shouldn't be in charge.
Didn't we change our minds about Vietnam? Does changing your mind
mean
you've 'lost'?

So, what you're saying is that if one changes one mind once, and it
doesn't
turn out the way you want, it's a bad thing to change your mind in the
future?
Where did you see me say that?

This was my last post: "Didn't we change our minds about Vietnam?
Does changing your mind mean you've 'lost'?"

You implied that it was OK for the President to change his mind,
meaning, I suppose, that the Afghanistan war is no longer one of
necessity. OK, so if we now cut and run, will we have lost?

If you want to change the subject and run, that's OK. You backed
yourself into a corner.

My question, from the last post, still stands.

Read my response to the previous post and get back to me when you
understand it.

It's understood. Now answer the question.

Pushy little broad, eh?

Got any other names you'd like to call me? If so, go for it... I'm sure
we'll be impressed.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Hitler finds out Americans are calling each other Nazis	Lu Powell[_8_]	General	2	September 1st 09 06:14 PM
The new Hitler	Gregory Hall	ASA	1	November 11th 08 11:59 PM
Usenet downloads: Hitler Bismarck.jpg 202175 bytes	HEMI-Powered@[email protected]	Tall Ship Photos	0	March 24th 08 02:07 AM
The New Hitler	Bob Crantz	ASA	21	December 13th 05 02:47 PM

Menu

About Us