On Oct 14, 11:49*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:09:11 -0500, wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:02:34 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:15:05 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:21:28 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:12:47 -0500, wrote:

These folks sport their royal double-standards in the melee of
political conversation, and when it's shown that it's nothing but tin
foil, they lose their emblematic moral dilemma post haste. *They're
like dodge convertibles, if you know what I mean.

Always liked the looks of the Sebring, but not knowing anything about
Chryco cars, never went after one.
Had a '55 Belvidere stick (actually my ma's) and had a '74 Dart
Swinger. *It dad that good straight 6 but the body rotted like tin.
What do you mean by "they're like dodge convertibles?"
If it's something dirty, just try to suggest your meaning with some
delicacy. *I'm pretty sensitive.

--Vic

There's no double entendre intended, Vic. *It was more of a metaphor..
The only convertible I've ever had in possession was a Triumph
Spitfire, '71 if I remember correctly. *Looked something like this,
but was orange with with racing strips;

http://www.motaa.com/Images09/74%20t...0JIM%20&%20JUD....

If that was the greatest ride in the world! *It was like riding right
above the pavement.

You sporting a Hummer these days?

Ford F150.

Standard Republican issue.

Still attempting to save face, little one? Especially after having
your arse handed to you in such royal form?

By the way, how is your standard issue Peugeot holding in there?