BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Refining "Green" trash (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/110823-refining-green-trash.html)

John H.[_9_] October 19th 09 09:47 PM

Refining "Green" trash
 
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:13:26 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:00:53 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:59:39 -0400, John H.
wrote:

You missed the point, these things get burned here, not put in the
dump. Deposits are just a tax. It may be a handy way to employ
unskilled labor in a make work job but that is the only redeeming
thing.


They could be burnt after being returned to the store. The stores
would just be centralized collection points. I'll bet a lot fewer
empties would be in the ditches, on the golf courses, or floating in
the bay.

I suppose that might make a lot of sense if you live in a place where
they have a huge litter problem but I bet it would be cheaper in the
long run to pay people to pick up the trash. I know you think that is
"free" in a place with a deposit law but I would compare the cost of
product before the deposit is added and show you where you are paying.

To start with, most places where this happens pay the merchant 2 cents
a bottle or so, just for handling them. That money comes from you
somewhere.

You missed the point. The deposit should be steep enough that people
want to bring them back - or, better yet, not buy them at all. Then
the energy used to make the damn things could be saved.

So you don't care if everything delivered in a bottle got a 5-10%
price increase or that the price increase got spread out across the
whole grocery store inventory?
Even if the deposit was a one for one swap with no real cost
(fantasy), there is still a handling charge on the empties.
They stopped using deposit bottles for a reason., It is very expensive
and uses almost fuel to return them as it does to deliver the product
in the first place.
If you simply burn the plastic bottles to produce electricity it is
simply a one way fuel delivery charge with the use as a container as a
bonus.

Up here...ten cents deposit on every bottle, can or carton...including
milk.
If you haul them back to the recycle depot, you get a nickel for each
bottle/carton.
Most people don't bother and just put the empties out in a 'blue bag'.
This
had caused an army of characters to roam around all garbage night digging
in
those blue bags for their treasure. They carry half a dozen full leaf type
bags on their 'borrowed' grocery store carts to cash in.
This has been going on for years .


What do the stores do with the bottles that are returned?


They don't go back to the stores anymore. You have to take them to an
official recycling depot.
They are then put in hugh containers and shipped out to be melted down and
the material re-used.


I just re-read what you said. They charge ten cents deposit but only
refund five cents? Sounds like the store, or someone (the government)
is definitely ripping off the bottle purchasers.

I like the concept though. Anything that would reduce the amount of
plastic bottles thrown on the roads, waters, golf courses, or
whereever is a good thing.

John H.[_9_] October 19th 09 09:49 PM

Refining "Green" trash
 
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:16:08 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:00:53 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:59:39 -0400, John H.
wrote:

You missed the point, these things get burned here, not put in the
dump. Deposits are just a tax. It may be a handy way to employ
unskilled labor in a make work job but that is the only redeeming
thing.


They could be burnt after being returned to the store. The stores
would just be centralized collection points. I'll bet a lot fewer
empties would be in the ditches, on the golf courses, or floating in
the bay.

I suppose that might make a lot of sense if you live in a place where
they have a huge litter problem but I bet it would be cheaper in the
long run to pay people to pick up the trash. I know you think that is
"free" in a place with a deposit law but I would compare the cost of
product before the deposit is added and show you where you are paying.

To start with, most places where this happens pay the merchant 2 cents
a bottle or so, just for handling them. That money comes from you
somewhere.

You missed the point. The deposit should be steep enough that people
want to bring them back - or, better yet, not buy them at all. Then
the energy used to make the damn things could be saved.

So you don't care if everything delivered in a bottle got a 5-10%
price increase or that the price increase got spread out across the
whole grocery store inventory?
Even if the deposit was a one for one swap with no real cost
(fantasy), there is still a handling charge on the empties.
They stopped using deposit bottles for a reason., It is very expensive
and uses almost fuel to return them as it does to deliver the product
in the first place.
If you simply burn the plastic bottles to produce electricity it is
simply a one way fuel delivery charge with the use as a container as a
bonus.


Up here...ten cents deposit on every bottle, can or carton...including milk.
If you haul them back to the recycle depot, you get a nickel for each
bottle/carton.
Most people don't bother and just put the empties out in a 'blue bag'. This
had caused an army of characters to roam around all garbage night digging in
those blue bags for their treasure. They carry half a dozen full leaf type
bags on their 'borrowed' grocery store carts to cash in.
This has been going on for years .



It is a crime here to rob the recycle, but it still happens.
One problem with "deposit laws" for "litter control" is the bums only
pick up the bottles. You still have to send a guy out there to get all
the other trash.


I've no problem with that. The folks getting paid to pick up the trash
will have less to pick up, and the landfills will be filled with fewer
plastic bottles.

John H.[_9_] October 20th 09 02:04 PM

Refining "Green" trash
 
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:42:31 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:49:09 -0400, John H.
wrote:

It is a crime here to rob the recycle, but it still happens.
One problem with "deposit laws" for "litter control" is the bums only
pick up the bottles. You still have to send a guy out there to get all
the other trash.


I've no problem with that. The folks getting paid to pick up the trash
will have less to pick up, and the landfills will be filled with fewer
plastic bottles.



They burn them in the waste to energy plant as far as I know and at
that point it is just fuel. the more the better. Until you get a
deposit on the 6 pack rings, sandwich bags and styrofoam cups you have
not accomplished much. That is what endangers wildlife


My attitude with regard to plastic water bottles has nothing to do
with wildlife.

But, I agree that something should be done about the rings. Ban them.
Sell beer, etc., in cardboard boxes. At least those decompose. Ditto
for styrofoam cups.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com