![]() |
Refining "Green" trash
On Oct 14, 1:30*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:16:14 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:27:15 -0400, H the K wrote: Ft Myers is burning their trash for electricity. I think that is an excellent use. It is certainly a reliable fuel source. I think they should be burning the paper and plastic "recycle" too. Nobody has even convinced me trucking this stuff 500-1500 miles was good for the environment or economically viable. My neighbor, VP of Raymond Lumber, thought it might be a valuable marketing tool to be able to say those recycled bottles you throw in the blue tubs come back as the Trex he sells and add some gee whiz info about the process.. In that little quest for knowledge he found out we were trucking the plastic to a plant in New York. The paper was being processed in Georgia. I hope the fort is doing better than military bases usually do in pollution control. This fort has not been a military base since the war of northern aggression. Hey it is (Robert E) Lee County. *;-) The waste to energy incinerator has been blessed by the environmentalists as being as clean as the new gas powered plant. (both a whole lot better than the bunker oil plant they displaced.) The trash plant doesn't even contribute to the thermal water pollution that makes the Caloosahatchee River a manatee hangout. Speaking of recycling, the new "Dirty Jobs" episode (last week's) had an interesting one on mattress recycling. Among the interesting facts - almost all of the mattress and/or box springs are 100% recyled into other stuff including the fabric. Best fact of all - the overall weight of a mattress increases by about 10% over the years with the addition of such things as dead skin cells, residue from various fluids and atmospheric dust. Various fluids? |
Refining "Green" trash
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:04:46 -0500, thunder
wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:30:32 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: such things as dead skin cells, I just know you want to hear this. ;-) It's not only mattresses, but 75% of household dust, is dead skin cells. COOL!!! One of my old hunting buddies is a forensic scientist who studied under Dr. Lee. Some of the stuff they find in houses, bedrooms and stuff like that is amazing. |
Refining "Green" trash
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:22:02 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Oct 14, 1:30*am, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:16:14 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:27:15 -0400, H the K wrote: Ft Myers is burning their trash for electricity. I think that is an excellent use. It is certainly a reliable fuel source. I think they should be burning the paper and plastic "recycle" too. Nobody has even convinced me trucking this stuff 500-1500 miles was good for the environment or economically viable. My neighbor, VP of Raymond Lumber, thought it might be a valuable marketing tool to be able to say those recycled bottles you throw in the blue tubs come back as the Trex he sells and add some gee whiz info about the process.. In that little quest for knowledge he found out we were trucking the plastic to a plant in New York. The paper was being processed in Georgia. I hope the fort is doing better than military bases usually do in pollution control. This fort has not been a military base since the war of northern aggression. Hey it is (Robert E) Lee County. *;-) The waste to energy incinerator has been blessed by the environmentalists as being as clean as the new gas powered plant. (both a whole lot better than the bunker oil plant they displaced.) The trash plant doesn't even contribute to the thermal water pollution that makes the Caloosahatchee River a manatee hangout. Speaking of recycling, the new "Dirty Jobs" episode (last week's) had an interesting one on mattress recycling. Among the interesting facts - almost all of the mattress and/or box springs are 100% recyled into other stuff including the fabric. Best fact of all - the overall weight of a mattress increases by about 10% over the years with the addition of such things as dead skin cells, residue from various fluids and atmospheric dust. Various fluids? He didn't ask and I don't want to know. :) |
Refining "Green" trash
On Oct 14, 7:10*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:22:02 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 14, 1:30*am, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:16:14 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:27:15 -0400, H the K wrote: Ft Myers is burning their trash for electricity. I think that is an excellent use. It is certainly a reliable fuel source. I think they should be burning the paper and plastic "recycle" too.. Nobody has even convinced me trucking this stuff 500-1500 miles was good for the environment or economically viable. My neighbor, VP of Raymond Lumber, thought it might be a valuable marketing tool to be able to say those recycled bottles you throw in the blue tubs come back as the Trex he sells and add some gee whiz info about the process.. In that little quest for knowledge he found out we were trucking the plastic to a plant in New York. The paper was being processed in Georgia. I hope the fort is doing better than military bases usually do in pollution control. This fort has not been a military base since the war of northern aggression. Hey it is (Robert E) Lee County. *;-) The waste to energy incinerator has been blessed by the environmentalists as being as clean as the new gas powered plant. (both a whole lot better than the bunker oil plant they displaced.) The trash plant doesn't even contribute to the thermal water pollution that makes the Caloosahatchee River a manatee hangout. Speaking of recycling, the new "Dirty Jobs" episode (last week's) had an interesting one on mattress recycling. Among the interesting facts - almost all of the mattress and/or box springs are 100% recyled into other stuff including the fabric. Best fact of all - the overall weight of a mattress increases by about 10% over the years with the addition of such things as dead skin cells, residue from various fluids and atmospheric dust. Various fluids? He didn't ask and I don't want to know. *:) 'r-r-rroger" |
Refining "Green" trash
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:04:46 -0500, thunder
wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:30:32 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: such things as dead skin cells, I just know you want to hear this. ;-) It's not only mattresses, but 75% of household dust, is dead skin cells. http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2008/09/01/ does_the_dust_in_my_house_really_include_my_own_s kin/ Some "science" ain't too good. That piece of "science" is plain laughable. The 75% part you mentioned. Couldn't get at the article. Everything in a house is decomposing. Anybody who ever found an unoccupied closed room all dusty knows better than that. --Vic |
Refining "Green" trash
|
Refining "Green" trash
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:38:27 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:33:09 -0400, KotP-A wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:20:21 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:10:15 -0400, KotP-A wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:02:11 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:36:05 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: My son sent me this. I think it would be an excellent way to help eliminate land fills and pollution by efficiently turning crap into "clean" carbon for various uses. http://www.mantria.com/mantria_industries.shtml click below the vid. I kept hitting the arrow on the screen and nothing happened. then I clicked below it where it says "Click here....." Oh, never mind Ft Myers is burning their trash for electricity. I think that is an excellent use. It is certainly a reliable fuel source. I think they should be burning the paper and plastic "recycle" too. Nobody has even convinced me trucking this stuff 500-1500 miles was good for the environment or economically viable. My neighbor, VP of Raymond Lumber, thought it might be a valuable marketing tool to be able to say those recycled bottles you throw in the blue tubs come back as the Trex he sells and add some gee whiz info about the process.. In that little quest for knowledge he found out we were trucking the plastic to a plant in New York. The paper was being processed in Georgia. I think the sale of water in plastic bottles should be outlawed. If water must be sold, it should be done in glass and returned for a deposit. Why not just burn them in the waste to energy plant? Do you know how much energy it takes to ship glass? There is also the hazard broken glass poses in the whole retail to recycle chain. We got away from glass bottles for a reason. OK, OK. Require a deposit for all plastic bottles. That way most will get returned and recycled. Hopefully fewer will end up in the dump or Chesapeake Bay. You missed the point, these things get burned here, not put in the dump. Deposits are just a tax. It may be a handy way to employ unskilled labor in a make work job but that is the only redeeming thing. They could be burnt after being returned to the store. The stores would just be centralized collection points. I'll bet a lot fewer empties would be in the ditches, on the golf courses, or floating in the bay. |
Refining "Green" trash
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:57:58 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:00:10 -0400, KotP-A wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:38:27 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:33:09 -0400, KotP-A wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:20:21 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:10:15 -0400, KotP-A wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:02:11 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:36:05 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: My son sent me this. I think it would be an excellent way to help eliminate land fills and pollution by efficiently turning crap into "clean" carbon for various uses. http://www.mantria.com/mantria_industries.shtml click below the vid. I kept hitting the arrow on the screen and nothing happened. then I clicked below it where it says "Click here....." Oh, never mind Ft Myers is burning their trash for electricity. I think that is an excellent use. It is certainly a reliable fuel source. I think they should be burning the paper and plastic "recycle" too. Nobody has even convinced me trucking this stuff 500-1500 miles was good for the environment or economically viable. My neighbor, VP of Raymond Lumber, thought it might be a valuable marketing tool to be able to say those recycled bottles you throw in the blue tubs come back as the Trex he sells and add some gee whiz info about the process.. In that little quest for knowledge he found out we were trucking the plastic to a plant in New York. The paper was being processed in Georgia. I think the sale of water in plastic bottles should be outlawed. If water must be sold, it should be done in glass and returned for a deposit. Why not just burn them in the waste to energy plant? Do you know how much energy it takes to ship glass? There is also the hazard broken glass poses in the whole retail to recycle chain. We got away from glass bottles for a reason. OK, OK. Require a deposit for all plastic bottles. That way most will get returned and recycled. Hopefully fewer will end up in the dump or Chesapeake Bay. You missed the point, these things get burned here, not put in the dump. Deposits are just a tax. It may be a handy way to employ unskilled labor in a make work job but that is the only redeeming thing. They could be burnt after being returned to the store. The stores would just be centralized collection points. I'll bet a lot fewer empties would be in the ditches, on the golf courses, or floating in the bay. I suppose that might make a lot of sense if you live in a place where they have a huge litter problem but I bet it would be cheaper in the long run to pay people to pick up the trash. I know you think that is "free" in a place with a deposit law but I would compare the cost of product before the deposit is added and show you where you are paying. To start with, most places where this happens pay the merchant 2 cents a bottle or so, just for handling them. That money comes from you somewhere. You missed the point. The deposit should be steep enough that people want to bring them back - or, better yet, not buy them at all. Then the energy used to make the damn things could be saved. |
Refining "Green" trash
On Oct 15, 10:59*am, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:57:58 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:00:10 -0400, KotP-A wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:38:27 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:33:09 -0400, KotP-A wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:20:21 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:10:15 -0400, KotP-A wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:02:11 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:36:05 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: My son sent me this. I think it would be an excellent way to help eliminate land fills and pollution by efficiently turning crap into "clean" carbon for various uses. http://www.mantria.com/mantria_industries.shtml click below the vid. I kept hitting the arrow on the screen and nothing happened. then I clicked below it where it says "Click here....." Oh, never mind Ft Myers is burning their trash for electricity. I think that is an excellent use. It is certainly a reliable fuel source. I think they should be burning the paper and plastic "recycle" too.. Nobody has even convinced me trucking this stuff 500-1500 miles was good for the environment or economically viable. My neighbor, VP of Raymond Lumber, thought it might be a valuable marketing tool to be able to say those recycled bottles you throw in the blue tubs come back as the Trex he sells and add some gee whiz info about the process.. In that little quest for knowledge he found out we were trucking the plastic to a plant in New York. The paper was being processed in Georgia. I think the sale of water in plastic bottles should be outlawed. If water must be sold, it should be done in glass and returned for a deposit. Why not just burn them in the waste to energy plant? Do you know how much energy it takes to ship glass? There is also the hazard broken glass poses in the whole retail to recycle chain. We got away from glass bottles for a reason. OK, OK. Require a deposit for all plastic bottles. That way most will get returned and recycled. Hopefully fewer will end up in the dump or Chesapeake Bay. You missed the point, these things get burned here, not put in the dump. Deposits are just a tax. It may be a handy way to employ unskilled labor in a make work job but that is the only redeeming thing. They could be burnt after being returned to the store. The stores would just be centralized collection points. I'll bet a lot fewer empties would be in the ditches, on the golf courses, or floating in the bay. I suppose that might make a lot of sense if you live in a place where they have a huge litter problem but I bet it would be cheaper in the long run to pay people to pick up the trash. I know you think that is "free" in a place with a deposit law but I would compare the cost of product before the deposit is added and show you where you are paying. To start with, most places where this happens pay the merchant 2 cents a bottle or so, just for handling them. That money comes from you somewhere. You missed the point. The deposit should be steep enough that people want to bring them back - or, better yet, not buy them at all. Then the energy used to make the damn things could be saved.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - make it high enough and people will be importing them in from out of state. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com