Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Bad news for Peak Oil theorists...
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Bad news for Peak Oil theorists...
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:43:02 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/c...the-world.html Who knows? Maybe some day the liberals will see an advantage to nuclear energy also. Things change in this world. |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Bad news for Peak Oil theorists...
On Oct 12, 9:01*am, John H wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:43:02 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/c..._pritchard/629... Who knows? Maybe some day the liberals will see an advantage to nuclear energy also. we always have. i actually met ralph nader about 35 years ago and told him he was wrong on nuclear power. and he was. |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Bad news for Peak Oil theorists...
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:43:02 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ ambroseevans_pritchard/6299291/Energy-crisis-is-postponed-as-new-gas- rescues-the-world.html Yeah, but it ain't a Silver Bullet. Fracking takes tremendous amounts of water, and uses carcinogenic chemicals. That sometimes leaves a choice between clean drinking water, and energy. That is, if the area has the water resources to begin with. Overall, good news, but problems to have to be worked out. http://www.earthworksaction.org/pubs...drFrac_CBM.pdf |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Bad news for Peak Oil theorists...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:59:02 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:01:27 -0400, John H wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:43:02 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/c...the-world.html Who knows? Maybe some day the liberals will see an advantage to nuclear energy also. Things change in this world. I don't get how you see everything in such a black-white/liberal-conservative way, but let's play it your way.... why are the conservatives so 1) opposed to centralized management, I'm not at all opposed to centralized management, as long as it's not the government. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission should stay in business to insure that appropriate safety regulations are enforced. 2) opposed to government involvement in major industrial enterprises, Because *our* government tends to dick things up when it gets control. The second item in your document was, "...close cooperation among the key industrial players and the government," The word 'involvement' was your addition. I've no problem with close cooperation. 3) and opposed to recycling of nuclear waste? Why would I be opposed to the recycling of nuclear waste? That's a silly assumption. .....since you keep pointing to the French as an example of how it should be done and those are the three things that make nuclear energy happen for them...... http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/....html?PageNr=2 The French system makes a lot of sense. Why are liberals so against it? |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Bad news for Peak Oil theorists...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:55:19 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:29:26 -0400, KotP-A wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:59:02 -0400, Gene wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:01:27 -0400, John H wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:43:02 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/c...the-world.html Who knows? Maybe some day the liberals will see an advantage to nuclear energy also. Things change in this world. I don't get how you see everything in such a black-white/liberal-conservative way, but let's play it your way.... why are the conservatives so 1) opposed to centralized management, I'm not at all opposed to centralized management, as long as it's not the government. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission should stay in business to insure that appropriate safety regulations are enforced. So...... the government should stay out of it and not have any role in management, but the (Government) Nuclear Regulatory Commission should stay in business to manage enforcement of safety regulations (plus anything else that might be in their charter?)? Yes. Right, ok.... I guess that kinda makes sense, sorta, maybe in an odd way........ or not! 2) opposed to government involvement in major industrial enterprises, Because *our* government tends to dick things up when it gets control. The second item in your document was, "...close cooperation among the key industrial players and the government," The word 'involvement' was your addition. I've no problem with close cooperation. Wasn't my word at all... it came straight out of the article: "Such closely knit cooperation is, of course, much easier in France, which has a long tradition of government involvement in major industrial enterprises, ranging from the supersonic Concorde jetliner to the TGV high-speed train." 3) and opposed to recycling of nuclear waste? Why would I be opposed to the recycling of nuclear waste? That's a silly assumption. You are conservative, conservatives have been all about storage of nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain. Obama is a liberal, he stopped those plans and his energy secretary,Chu, has referred to future reprocessing of waste so it can be recycled. Therefore it follows that you are against reprocessing, since you are not a liberal. Right, ok.... I guess that kinda makes sense, sorta, maybe in an odd way........ or not! Mostly not. .....since you keep pointing to the French as an example of how it should be done and those are the three things that make nuclear energy happen for them...... http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/....html?PageNr=2 The French system makes a lot of sense. Why are liberals so against it? Well, let's see: "The French nuclear program is based on three key ideas: centralized management, close cooperation among the key industrial players and the government, and the recycling of nuclear waste." You just said that didn't make any sense, so, by your own logic, you must be a liberal! And, using your binary logic, I must be a conservative..... you commie pinko fag....... I just said 'what' didn't make sense? I agreed with all three of the key ideas. I think your little ploy backfired. Again, The French system makes a lot of sense. Why are liberals so against it? |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Bad news for Peak Oil theorists...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:29:53 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:37:12 -0400, KotP-A wrote: Again, The French system makes a lot of sense. Why are liberals so against it? Again. You are jumping on your horse and riding off in about 10 different directions. Either the French system makes a lot of sense as is or it doesn't. Your objections to what "doesn't make sense" render the French model meaningless and non-operative. If you want to create your *own* system and tout it's benefits, fine, but you can't take an existing system, mentally modify it to your whim and continue to call it the same thing..... it is different.... how, exactly, is known only to you. Besides. You've yet to post the first shred of concrete evidence that "liberals," who or what ever they are, are "against the French System" as it actually exists. (Barring a group of extreme lefties in GB.) Hey Gene, what 'objections' did I pose? I was against the government running the system. I wasn't against 'cooperation' with the government. Other than that, I believe I agreed with everything you pasted. What are the ten different directions? 'Liberals', in general, are against nuclear power. How often do you hear 'Bama mentioning it? Again, show me all the modifications I demanded. Just list three or four, that should do it. |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Bad news for Peak Oil theorists...
On 10/13/09 6:21 PM, Gene wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:13:33 -0400, KotP-A wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:29:53 -0400, Gene wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:37:12 -0400, KotP-A wrote: Again, The French system makes a lot of sense. Why are liberals so against it? Again. You are jumping on your horse and riding off in about 10 different directions. Either the French system makes a lot of sense as is or it doesn't. Your objections to what "doesn't make sense" render the French model meaningless and non-operative. If you want to create your *own* system and tout it's benefits, fine, but you can't take an existing system, mentally modify it to your whim and continue to call it the same thing..... it is different.... how, exactly, is known only to you. Besides. You've yet to post the first shred of concrete evidence that "liberals," who or what ever they are, are "against the French System" as it actually exists. (Barring a group of extreme lefties in GB.) Hey Gene, what 'objections' did I pose? I was against the government running the system. I wasn't against 'cooperation' with the government. Other than that, I believe I agreed with everything you pasted. What are the ten different directions? 'Liberals', in general, are against nuclear power. How often do you hear 'Bama mentioning it? Again, show me all the modifications I demanded. Just list three or four, that should do it. You've yet to post the first shred of concrete evidence that "liberals," who or what ever they are, are "against the French System" as it actually exists. (Barring a group of extreme lefties in GB.) Fascinating that herring worked for the government his entire life...without objection. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Bad news for Peak Oil theorists...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:21:15 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:13:33 -0400, KotP-A wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:29:53 -0400, Gene wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:37:12 -0400, KotP-A wrote: Again, The French system makes a lot of sense. Why are liberals so against it? Again. You are jumping on your horse and riding off in about 10 different directions. Either the French system makes a lot of sense as is or it doesn't. Your objections to what "doesn't make sense" render the French model meaningless and non-operative. If you want to create your *own* system and tout it's benefits, fine, but you can't take an existing system, mentally modify it to your whim and continue to call it the same thing..... it is different.... how, exactly, is known only to you. Besides. You've yet to post the first shred of concrete evidence that "liberals," who or what ever they are, are "against the French System" as it actually exists. (Barring a group of extreme lefties in GB.) Hey Gene, what 'objections' did I pose? I was against the government running the system. I wasn't against 'cooperation' with the government. Other than that, I believe I agreed with everything you pasted. What are the ten different directions? 'Liberals', in general, are against nuclear power. How often do you hear 'Bama mentioning it? Again, show me all the modifications I demanded. Just list three or four, that should do it. You've yet to post the first shred of concrete evidence that "liberals," who or what ever they are, are "against the French System" as it actually exists. (Barring a group of extreme lefties in GB.) That's it? Where's the ten different directions? Where are all my 'objections'. Why should I post anything about liberals being against nuclear power? Why, instead, don't you look real hard and see if you show that liberals are *for* nuclear power. You are a piece of cake, my friend. |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Bad news for Peak Oil theorists...
On 10/13/09 7:49 PM, Gene wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:42:17 -0400, KotP-A wrote: You've yet to post the first shred of concrete evidence that liberals," who or what ever they are, are "against the French System" as it actually exists. (Barring a group of extreme lefties in GB.) Support your original position, or admit defeat..... snerk Wait, maybe Glenn Beck will come up with something for his racist buddy, herring. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
peak-oil aka oil-peak someone knows what is it? | General | |||
peak-oil aka oil-peak someone knows what is it? | General | |||
OT--Great news for Iraq...terrible news for Iran | General | |||
10KW peak, 5KW continuous inverter...(c; | Cruising | |||
PLAYAK boat from bremgarten to Peak UK ? I'll 'pay' a free piece of PLAYAK Wear :-) | UK Paddle |