On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:06:32 -0400, queenie wrote:

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:00:10 GMT, KK wrote:

In other words, hats off to Obama for honestly talking about his past
(unlike W who said some cop-out bull****, or Clinton with the oh-so-
clintony "didn't break the laws of my country" and later "I didn't
inhale") ... but F him for dismissing serious questions about
decriminialization and F him for ignoring the waste, expense, and
injustice of the 60% of federal prisoners who are non-violent drug
offenders.

He's been in office TEN months and he already has a lot on his plate due
to the disastrous policies of the previous administration.

That's about enough that stupid bleat you've adopted.


It doesn't take time to *not* force through "emergency" billions
(trillons?) that won't be spent for years.

It doesn't take time to keep to a promise to make bills available to the
public before signing them.

It doesn't take time to *not* dismiss the question I referred to above.

And - even if it did - it's been almost a ****ing *year*, dummy.




Give him
time. Right now, the wars, health care reform and the economy come
first. Geez!!

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:58:26 GMT, KK wrote:


And - even if it did - it's been almost a ****ing *year*, dummy.

You're a real asshole, KK. You always have to resort to name calling.
I'm beginning to despise you.

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:55:54 -0400, queenie
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:58:26 GMT, KK wrote:


And - even if it did - it's been almost a ****ing *year*, dummy.

You're a real asshole, KK. You always have to resort to name calling.
I'm beginning to despise you.



Yah. LIEberals, like Obammy, hate it when their faults are made
public. That's why Obammy wants to put FOX NEWS on his "enemies"
list. Amazingly, even CBS pointed this out.

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:38:27 -0500, Fiftycal
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:55:54 -0400, queenie
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:58:26 GMT, KK wrote:


And - even if it did - it's been almost a ****ing *year*, dummy.

You're a real asshole, KK. You always have to resort to name calling.
I'm beginning to despise you.



Yah. LIEberals, like Obammy, hate it when their faults are made
public. That's why Obammy wants to put FOX NEWS on his "enemies"
list. Amazingly, even CBS pointed this out.

Oh, did Obama admit to faults? Geez, what a giant step forward from
our last president.

He should get another Nobel. The not GW Bush Nobel Prize.

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:27:29 -0700, jps wrote:

And - even if it did - it's been almost a ****ing *year*, dummy.

You're a real asshole, KK. You always have to resort to name calling.
I'm beginning to despise you.



Yah. LIEberals, like Obammy, hate it when their faults are made
public. That's why Obammy wants to put FOX NEWS on his "enemies"
list. Amazingly, even CBS pointed this out.

Oh, did Obama admit to faults? Geez, what a giant step forward from
our last president.

Reading comprehension problem? Where in the above 3 lines did I
intimate that Obammy "admit" to anything?

He should get another Nobel. The not GW Bush Nobel Prize.

He already got that one. BTW, the reason the eurotrash socialists
gave him the "piece" prize was for not stopping the AIG bailout. If
he had, then the euros wouldn't have gotten about $120 billion in
"insurance" that AIG had sold for "derivatives". Most of that going
to eurotrash banks owned/controlled by states and their cronys.

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:37:31 -0500, Fiftycal wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:27:29 -0700, jps wrote:

And - even if it did - it's been almost a ****ing *year*, dummy.

You're a real asshole, KK. You always have to resort to name calling.
I'm beginning to despise you.



Yah. LIEberals, like Obammy, hate it when their faults are made
public. That's why Obammy wants to put FOX NEWS on his "enemies" list.
Amazingly, even CBS pointed this out.

Oh, did Obama admit to faults? Geez, what a giant step forward from our
last president.

Reading comprehension problem? Where in the above 3 lines did I
intimate that Obammy "admit" to anything?

He should get another Nobel. The not GW Bush Nobel Prize.

He already got that one. BTW, the reason the eurotrash socialists gave
him the "piece" prize was for not stopping the AIG bailout. If he had,
then the euros wouldn't have gotten about $120 billion in "insurance"
that AIG had sold for "derivatives". Most of that going to eurotrash
banks owned/controlled by states and their cronys.

Why did you put those "things" in "quotes"? Do you not think that
derivatives are real things?

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:38:27 -0500, Fiftycal
wrote:

Yah. LIEberals, like Obammy, hate it when their faults are made
public. That's why Obammy wants to put FOX NEWS on his "enemies"
list. Amazingly, even CBS pointed this out.

Most mainstream media is owned by big corporations so it's no surprise
that they'd want to defend Faux News.

On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:27:47 -0400, queenie
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:38:27 -0500, Fiftycal
wrote:

Yah. LIEberals, like Obammy, hate it when their faults are made
public. That's why Obammy wants to put FOX NEWS on his "enemies"
list. Amazingly, even CBS pointed this out.

Most mainstream media is owned by big corporations so it's no surprise
that they'd want to defend Faux News.

Really? SO corporations exist to "share the wealth"??? If this was
mere corporatism, then it would make sense for them to SUPPORT
excluding one of the partners. Ideally, ONE corporation would be the
mouthpiece for Obammy.

I say that the news media finally remembered the Nixon administration
and how the "enemies" list worked. They realized THEY could end up on
it if they EVER dissed Obammy.

queenie wrote in
news
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:38:27 -0500, Fiftycal
wrote:

Yah. LIEberals, like Obammy, hate it when their faults are made
public. That's why Obammy wants to put FOX NEWS on his "enemies"
list. Amazingly, even CBS pointed this out.

Most mainstream media is owned by big corporations so it's no surprise
that they'd want to defend Faux News.



Nope, freedom of the press is the reason they defend FOX news. The
administration should not be in the business of trying to direct news
outlets.

--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?

On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:29:45 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

queenie wrote in
news
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:38:27 -0500, Fiftycal
wrote:

Yah. LIEberals, like Obammy, hate it when their faults are made
public. That's why Obammy wants to put FOX NEWS on his "enemies"
list. Amazingly, even CBS pointed this out.

Most mainstream media is owned by big corporations so it's no surprise
that they'd want to defend Faux News.

Nope, freedom of the press is the reason they defend FOX news. The
administration should not be in the business of trying to direct news
outlets.

Very true. But that does not negate what I said.