On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:08:53 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

jps wrote in news:61hqd55pj0s048sm5sp264gijt5or48jso@
4ax.com:

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:06:50 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

"Clave" wrote in
:

"Yer Pal Al" wrote in message
news:99084229-9e54-4c51-b7e9-
..
. On Oct 18, 1:43 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" rdsandman(spamlock)
@comcast.net wrote:
"Clave" wrote
innews:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cablespeed mi.com:

...

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...&ie=UTF-8&rlz=
1T4GWYE
_en
US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie

Those are opinion sites like Daily Kos, Huffingon Post,
democraticunderground, etc.. I did not see any that sited the
actual
case nor were any of the cites AP, UPI or a news site.

I forgot to mention what an amazing feat that was for you to have
looked through all 82,300 of those links that fast.

Congratulations, retard.


I called it...

You got me curious here, Al.

What exactly are you denying? That Wilson and Akre v Fox never
existed, that Fox lost the initial case, or that Fox appealed and
won,
the court affirming that they had a right to lie?

I anxiously await your mother-of-all-retards reply.

And we anxiously await a cite to the case from you. I want to read the
actual case, not a Daily Kos take on it.

There were plenty of entrees available that had nothing to do with
Daily Kos.

That's true. Some came from the Huffington Post (which was acknowledged)
and other blogs or opinion pieces....none came from either credible
sources or a case cite.

You simply don't want to see them because it'll cause you to have to
reevaluate your fragile reality. Wouldn't want your hair to
spontaneously combust find that your cranium exploded from the
pressure of a severely constipated cortex.

If you have a case cite or credible news account, post it....otherwise,
you are considered another Daily Kos twit.

And your authority to judge me as such hails from what esteemed body?

You're afraid of the truth. It wouldn't matter how credible the
source, you'd set the bar ever higher to support your ill-formed
fantasies.

Have fun in your safe little cocoon.

jps wrote in
:

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:08:53 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

jps wrote in
news:61hqd55pj0s048sm5sp264gijt5or48jso@ 4ax.com:

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:06:50 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
wrote:

"Clave" wrote in
:

"Yer Pal Al" wrote in message
news:99084229-9e54-4c51-b7e9-
..
. On Oct 18, 1:43 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" rdsandman(spamlock)
@comcast.net wrote:
"Clave" wrote
innews:nKudnW3sNKyq_kfXnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@cablespeed mi.com:

...

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...&ie=UTF-8&rlz=
1T4GWYE
_en
US316US317&q=court+rules+fox+can+lie

Those are opinion sites like Daily Kos, Huffingon Post,
democraticunderground, etc.. I did not see any that sited the
actual
case nor were any of the cites AP, UPI or a news site.

I forgot to mention what an amazing feat that was for you to have
looked through all 82,300 of those links that fast.

Congratulations, retard.


I called it...

You got me curious here, Al.

What exactly are you denying? That Wilson and Akre v Fox never
existed, that Fox lost the initial case, or that Fox appealed and
won,
the court affirming that they had a right to lie?

I anxiously await your mother-of-all-retards reply.

And we anxiously await a cite to the case from you. I want to read
the actual case, not a Daily Kos take on it.

There were plenty of entrees available that had nothing to do with
Daily Kos.

That's true. Some came from the Huffington Post (which was
acknowledged) and other blogs or opinion pieces....none came from
either credible sources or a case cite.

You simply don't want to see them because it'll cause you to have to
reevaluate your fragile reality. Wouldn't want your hair to
spontaneously combust find that your cranium exploded from the
pressure of a severely constipated cortex.

If you have a case cite or credible news account, post
it....otherwise, you are considered another Daily Kos twit.

And your authority to judge me as such hails from what esteemed body?

I don't need any authority to judge you. You provide all that is needed.

You're afraid of the truth. It wouldn't matter how credible the
source, you'd set the bar ever higher to support your ill-formed
fantasies.

You haven't posted any so how can you make the comment?

Have fun in your safe little cocoon.




--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?