On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:23:33 -0400, Demon Buddha
wrote:

Um... not likely. Runaway inflation is not a result of economic
growth, but of out of control printing of paper money, which our
esteemed ex-president and congress were quite happy to kick off and
which our current Nobel laureate has taken to heights GW's puny mind
could unlikely wrap itself around.

I don't see that there is a significant difference between the two
presidents here. They both work for Big Business, with the huge tax
of a huge deficit we will pay.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison

rOn Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:03:59 -0600, Howard Brazee
wrote:

I don't see that there is a significant difference between the two
presidents here. They both work for Big Business, with the huge tax
of a huge deficit we will pay.

I totally agree with you, but it seems to me that the Democrats craft
policies that benefit the middle and lower classes and Republican
policies benefit the wealthy. Because Republican policies benefit
the minority--the wealthy, they need hate speech, racism, and wedge
issues to distract and divide so that they can win elections. JMO

queenie wrote in
:

rOn Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:03:59 -0600, Howard Brazee
wrote:

I don't see that there is a significant difference between the two
presidents here. They both work for Big Business, with the huge tax
of a huge deficit we will pay.

I totally agree with you, but it seems to me that the Democrats craft
policies that benefit the middle and lower classes and Republican
policies benefit the wealthy. Because Republican policies benefit
the minority--the wealthy, they need hate speech, racism, and wedge
issues to distract and divide so that they can win elections. JMO



Try posting after you get your brain back from the cleaners.

If you really think the Democrats are for the little guy in anything other
than name only you are a complete fool.

788 billion dollar "stimulus". Did big business get that or was it
distributed to the poor and needy?

Maybe you think nationalized health care is to help the porr and needy. Ask
your Congressman for specfics, he won;t have any. It was written by special
interests and not one single Congressdroid has the least freaking idea what's
in the bill.

If they don't know what's in the bill, how can they know is for those in
need?

On Oct 12, 6:19*pm, (Gray Ghost)
wrote:
queenie wrote :

rOn Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:03:59 -0600, Howard Brazee
wrote:

I don't see that there is a significant difference between the two
presidents here. * *They both work for Big Business, with the huge tax
of a huge deficit we will pay.

I totally agree with you, but it seems to me that the Democrats craft
policies that benefit the middle and lower classes and Republican
policies benefit the wealthy. * Because Republican policies benefit
the minority--the wealthy, they need hate speech, racism, and wedge
issues to distract and divide so that they can win elections. *JMO

Try posting after you get your brain back from the cleaners.

If you really think the Democrats are for the little guy in anything other
than name only you are a complete fool.

788 billion dollar "stimulus". Did big business get that or was it
distributed to the poor and needy?

Maybe you think nationalized health care is to help the porr and needy. Ask
your Congressman for specfics, he won;t have any. It was written by special
interests and not one single Congressdroid has the least freaking idea what's
in the bill.

If they don't know what's in the bill, how can they know is for those in
need?

The poor have been screwed more by social engineering than anyone
else. Millions of poor people qualify for medicaid but aren't singed
up...you think this would be a good issue for organizations like
ACORN, right? Nope! And they plan to cut funds to medicaid/medicare to
pay for the health care boondoggle they are planning...you really
think they are going to screw over a key constituency, seniors, who
vote, for the sake of poor people, who don't vote?
As it is, poor people can go to emergency rooms for care...but after?
I seriously doubt it.

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:35:01 -0400, queenie
wrote:

I totally agree with you, but it seems to me that the Democrats craft
policies that benefit the middle and lower classes and Republican
policies benefit the wealthy. Because Republican policies benefit
the minority--the wealthy, they need hate speech, racism, and wedge
issues to distract and divide so that they can win elections. JMO

And they don't actually have to *do* anything for the Religious Right
the way they do Big Business.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:35:01 -0400, queenie
puked:

rOn Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:03:59 -0600, Howard Brazee
wrote:

I don't see that there is a significant difference between the two
presidents here. They both work for Big Business, with the huge tax
of a huge deficit we will pay.

I totally agree with you, but it seems to me that the Democrats craft
policies that benefit the middle and lower classes and Republican
policies benefit the wealthy. Because Republican policies benefit
the minority--the wealthy, they need hate speech, racism, and wedge
issues to distract and divide so that they can win elections. JMO

But the Democrats, in this case, have crafted policies that save and
benefit big business and have proposed taxes that hurt small business
along with little in the stimulus for them.

So in essence, it's more of the same, except they are going out of
their way to hurt the group of businesses that employ the largest
number of people in the US.

In addition, they are continuing the concept of "trickle down" by
either giving huge sums of cash or outright taking over large
businesses hoping that it will trickle down into the economy.
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

lab~rat :-) wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:35:01 -0400, queenie
puked:

rOn Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:03:59 -0600, Howard Brazee
wrote:

I don't see that there is a significant difference between the two
presidents here. They both work for Big Business, with the huge tax
of a huge deficit we will pay.
I totally agree with you, but it seems to me that the Democrats craft
policies that benefit the middle and lower classes and Republican
policies benefit the wealthy. Because Republican policies benefit
the minority--the wealthy, they need hate speech, racism, and wedge
issues to distract and divide so that they can win elections. JMO

But the Democrats, in this case, have crafted policies that save and
benefit big business and have proposed taxes that hurt small business
along with little in the stimulus for them.

So in essence, it's more of the same, except they are going out of
their way to hurt the group of businesses that employ the largest
number of people in the US.

In addition, they are continuing the concept of "trickle down" by
either giving huge sums of cash or outright taking over large
businesses hoping that it will trickle down into the economy.
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

In the final analysis, republicans and democrats work the precise same
agenda. The difference is that they tell different lies. As to which
one ultimately "wins" (assuming one of them does), that will only
determine whether we become outwardly socialist or fascist, which in
terms of the pleasantness of our daily lives will be six of one or half
dozen of the other. As the old Wendy's ads used to say "one choice is
no choice".

If these elites are not beaten down - beaten unto death, we are all
****ed. So I will once again suggest that all ideologues on each side
of the argument proceed to remove their heads from their rectums as
rapidly as possible - forget this left/right nonsense, learn to
recognize the real threat, get over themselves and get to thinking
correctly about what should and should not be happening.

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:58:45 -0400, Demon Buddha
puked:

lab~rat :-) wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:35:01 -0400, queenie
puked:

rOn Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:03:59 -0600, Howard Brazee
wrote:

I don't see that there is a significant difference between the two
presidents here. They both work for Big Business, with the huge tax
of a huge deficit we will pay.
I totally agree with you, but it seems to me that the Democrats craft
policies that benefit the middle and lower classes and Republican
policies benefit the wealthy. Because Republican policies benefit
the minority--the wealthy, they need hate speech, racism, and wedge
issues to distract and divide so that they can win elections. JMO

But the Democrats, in this case, have crafted policies that save and
benefit big business and have proposed taxes that hurt small business
along with little in the stimulus for them.

So in essence, it's more of the same, except they are going out of
their way to hurt the group of businesses that employ the largest
number of people in the US.

In addition, they are continuing the concept of "trickle down" by
either giving huge sums of cash or outright taking over large
businesses hoping that it will trickle down into the economy.
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

In the final analysis, republicans and democrats work the precise same
agenda. The difference is that they tell different lies. As to which
one ultimately "wins" (assuming one of them does), that will only
determine whether we become outwardly socialist or fascist, which in
terms of the pleasantness of our daily lives will be six of one or half
dozen of the other. As the old Wendy's ads used to say "one choice is
no choice".

If these elites are not beaten down - beaten unto death, we are all
****ed. So I will once again suggest that all ideologues on each side
of the argument proceed to remove their heads from their rectums as
rapidly as possible - forget this left/right nonsense, learn to
recognize the real threat, get over themselves and get to thinking
correctly about what should and should not be happening.

I agree 100%. The problem isn't the Ds or the Rs, it's the people in
Washington.
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

On 12-Oct-2009, queenie wrote:

I totally agree with you, but it seems to me that the Democrats craft
policies that benefit the middle and lower classes and Republican
policies benefit the wealthy.

riiiight. that's why all the rich vote democrat and the working class repub

--
bill-o

Howard Brazee wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:23:33 -0400, Demon Buddha
wrote:

Um... not likely. Runaway inflation is not a result of economic
growth, but of out of control printing of paper money, which our
esteemed ex-president and congress were quite happy to kick off and
which our current Nobel laureate has taken to heights GW's puny mind
could unlikely wrap itself around.

I don't see that there is a significant difference between the two
presidents here. They both work for Big Business, with the huge tax
of a huge deficit we will pay.

I terms of principle, I fully agree. In terms of degree, I must part
company with you a bit. Though my logical mind knew things could be
worse than Bush, my heart didn't really want to believe it. Obama
shattered that by putting GW to shame in terms of incompetence, avarice,
hubris, out of control spending, and doing nothing of value. I can
hardly believe that it would have been possible to outstrip Bush by such
a margin, and yet here we are. Amazing.