"H K" wrote in message
...
On 10/9/09 3:00 PM, Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

wrote in message
...
On Oct 9, 8:59 am, wrote:


The far left "feel good" idiots have taken over most world committee...
They exist only to slap decent people down and redistribute wealth and
power to anybody who will hurt America... It's a joke...-

the far right has already redistributed our money to their rich
buddies, calling it god's will, all the while starting war after war.

In the past 100 years, which party's president was in office when the
wars
were started?

WWI -Wilson (D)
WWII - FDR (D)
Korea - Truman (D)
Vietnam - escalated by JFK and LBJ (D and D)
Iraq& Iran - Bush (R)

Let's see now 6 wars, one R, 5 D's.

As expected, the loony left failed math, ethics (truthfulness), and
logic.

unbelievable... They don't even care about the truth...


D'oh...that's right, Wilson started WWI, and FDR started WWII.


Obviously, you ignore the choices made leading to both wars. My reply to
your butt-hole buddy was obviously a counter point. Now you want to rewrite
history. WAFA

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:43:13 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 9, 9:30*am, wrote:


So you are not willing to address the point that the prize should have
a criteria of extraordinary achievement, or a lifetime of productive
dedication and sacrifice to a humanitarian cause. *As it stands now,
it's only an award for celebrity.


when it's awarded to someone you don't like, apparently

Why would you assume that I "don't like" President Obama?

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Oct 9, 3:41*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:41:58 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Oct 9, 10:41*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 05:42:55 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

he's winding down the war in iraq, moving to re-evaluate the failed
policies of his predecessor in afghanistan (which led nowhere for 7
years), is negotiating a nuclear arms reduction, the economy is
improving, he's moving on health care..

Oh please Bob - even you don't believe any of that. *He's trying to
figure out how to add more troops to a war that is getting more
unpopular by the second *- a WAR that he said was more important that
Iraq. *His words.

uh...let me see...you're saying he wants to add troops to a war he
thinks is important. and that proves he's not adding troops? and the
war is unpopular PRECISELY because bush was so incompetent.

Oh, by the way? *The person who nominated him and pushed it?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...usa/barackobam....

Here's a choice quote - one of many.

ROFLMAO!! anyone can nominate anyone for the nobel peace prize.

and that's a busted link

"The majority of women around the world associate gender justice, or
justice for women, with sharia compliance."

and george bush's fundamentalist view of christianity?

how'd that work out?

Man, you are really out of it.

Unfortunate - you seemed a pretty reasonable guy.-

IOW you're clueless about the fact bush ran the afghan war for 7
years. and that's why it's in the shape it's in

On Oct 9, 2:55*pm, "Lu Powell" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Oct 9, 8:59 am, Tosk wrote:



The far left "feel good" idiots have taken over most world committee...
They exist only to slap decent people down and redistribute wealth and
power to anybody who will hurt America... It's a joke...-
the far right has already redistributed our money to their rich
buddies, calling it god's will, all the while starting war after war.

In the past 100 years, which party's president was in office when the wars
were started?

WWI -Wilson (D)
WWII - FDR (D)
Korea - Truman (D)
Vietnam - escalated by JFK and LBJ (D and D)
Iraq & Iran - Bush (R)

Let's see now 6 wars, one R, 5 D's.

As expected, the loony left failed math, ethics (truthfulness), and logic..

guess he thinks FDR should have sat back and watched pearl harbor go
to the japanese.

and nixon killed half of all service members killed in vietnam. he
was a republican.

and bush started 2 wars in 1 term pretty good way to bankrupt the US

On Oct 9, 3:43*pm, "Lu Powell" wrote:


Obviously, you ignore the choices made leading to both wars. My reply to
your butt-hole buddy was obviously a counter point. Now you want to rewrite
history. WAFA-

republicans start wars they never want to end

Gene wrote:
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:13:17 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/9/09 8:07 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.

Heheheh...I was hoping this would give the righties apoplexy...and it is.

Wouldn't it be nicer, though, if he had actually had the time to EARN
the recognition? Why be in such haste?

You don't think like a Liveral-Left-Dim. Working for it is for the
slaves, since BO racked up $1.3 trillion in debt-corruption spend, it
means he is the world record holder as he did it in less than 8 months.

On Oct 10, 4:28*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
Gene wrote:
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:13:17 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/9/09 8:07 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.

Heheheh...I was hoping this would give the righties apoplexy...and it is.

Wouldn't it be nicer, though, if he had actually had the time to EARN
the recognition? Why be in such haste?

You don't think like a Liveral-Left-Dim. *Working for it is for the
slaves, since BO racked up $1.3 trillion in debt-corruption spend, it
means he is the world record holder as he did it in less than 8 months.

he's spending money bush already spent. bush wrecked the economy.
obama's just cleaning up

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Oct 10, 4:28 pm, Canuck57 wrote:
Gene wrote:
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:13:17 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/9/09 8:07 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.

Heheheh...I was hoping this would give the righties apoplexy...and it
is.

Wouldn't it be nicer, though, if he had actually had the time to EARN
the recognition? Why be in such haste?

You don't think like a Liveral-Left-Dim. Working for it is for the
slaves, since BO racked up $1.3 trillion in debt-corruption spend, it
means he is the world record holder as he did it in less than 8 months.

he's spending money bush already spent. bush wrecked the economy.
obama's just cleaning up

Reply:
How the hell is Obama cleaning up? By spending money we do not have, and
either borrow from the Saudi's of China? IF borrowing and spending made for
prosperity, the USSR would still be in existance and be the world's economic
leader.

On Oct 10, 5:49*pm, "CalifBill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Oct 10, 4:28 pm, Canuck57 wrote:





Gene wrote:
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:13:17 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/9/09 8:07 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.

Heheheh...I was hoping this would give the righties apoplexy...and it
is.

Wouldn't it be nicer, though, if he had actually had the time to EARN
the recognition? Why be in such haste?

You don't think like a Liveral-Left-Dim. Working for it is for the
slaves, since BO racked up $1.3 trillion in debt-corruption spend, it
means he is the world record holder as he did it in less than 8 months.

he's spending money bush already spent. bush wrecked the economy.
obama's just cleaning up

Reply:
How the hell is Obama cleaning up? *By spending money we do not have,

why not go read john maynard keynes about why the GOP/free market
economic model is dead...

and
either borrow from the Saudi's of China? *IF borrowing and spending made for
prosperity, the USSR would still be in existance and be the world's economic
leader.-

you want a great depression? wall street stole the money from the
middle class so the middle class has to borrow and spend to make sure
the rich won't collapse and take the rest of the country with it.

it's the stockholm syndrome writ into economics

On Oct 9, 5:48*pm, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:43:13 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 9, 9:30*am, wrote:

So you are not willing to address the point that the prize should have
a criteria of extraordinary achievement, or a lifetime of productive
dedication and sacrifice to a humanitarian cause. *As it stands now,
it's only an award for celebrity.

when it's awarded to someone you don't like, apparently

Why would you assume that I "don't like" President Obama?

--
my mistake...sorry