On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 05:42:55 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 9, 8:07*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.

He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was
made on Feb 1st of this year. *He hasn't even been in office for a
freakin' year yet.

Isreal is planning an Iranian raid, he's got two wars going, is also
preparing for an Iranian incursion, he hasn't passed any of his agenda
and isn't likely to, he's backed off on every single campaign promise
he made including Gitmo, *the economy is a wreck, Chrysler is doing
down the tubes as fast as you can say it with GM right behind, thrown
more of his homies under the bus than you can count, kept his mouth
shut about the Georgian/Russian conflict, threw the Iranians under the
bus when they revolted, backing a corrupt politician in Honduras, lost
the Olympics for Chicago and he wins a Peace Prize?

There isn't anybody else in the world working for peace that deserved
the prize?

It's a joke - has to be. *Only it's not April.

he's winding down the war in iraq, moving to re-evaluate the failed
policies of his predecessor in afghanistan (which led nowhere for 7
years), is negotiating a nuclear arms reduction, the economy is
improving, he's moving on health care..

Oh please Bob - even you don't believe any of that. He's trying to
figure out how to add more troops to a war that is getting more
unpopular by the second - a WAR that he said was more important that
Iraq. His words.

Oh, by the way? The person who nominated him and pushed it?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...nderstood.html

Here's a choice quote - one of many.

"The majority of women around the world associate gender justice, or
justice for women, with sharia compliance."

Really. How about that. Under shari’a law, a woman’s testimony in
court only counts for half of that of a man. If a woman is raped, she
needs four male witnesses to prove her case. If she makes the
accusation and doesn’t find four witnesses, the victim gets charged
with fornication or adultery and faces death.

She also believes that women should not be in public office. I wonder
if she knows "Mam" Boxer or Botox Pelosi?

Come on man, you're smarter than that.

On 10/9/09 10:41 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

Oh please Bob - even you don't believe any of that. He's trying to
figure out how to add more troops to a war that is getting more
unpopular by the second - a WAR that he said was more important that
Iraq. His words.


Poor Tom...he's drowning in a vat full of sour grapes.

But...what would you expect from a fan of Sarah Palin?


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:45:28 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/9/09 10:41 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

Oh please Bob - even you don't believe any of that. He's trying to
figure out how to add more troops to a war that is getting more
unpopular by the second - a WAR that he said was more important that
Iraq. His words.


Poor Tom...he's drowning in a vat full of sour grapes.

In your 'opinion,' it's not that Tom laments the travesty that the
Nobel Peace Prize, a once, fairly meritorious award, has become.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Oct 9, 10:41*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 05:42:55 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

he's winding down the war in iraq, moving to re-evaluate the failed
policies of his predecessor in afghanistan (which led nowhere for 7
years), is negotiating a nuclear arms reduction, the economy is
improving, he's moving on health care..

Oh please Bob - even you don't believe any of that. *He's trying to
figure out how to add more troops to a war that is getting more
unpopular by the second *- a WAR that he said was more important that
Iraq. *His words.

uh...let me see...you're saying he wants to add troops to a war he
thinks is important. and that proves he's not adding troops? and the
war is unpopular PRECISELY because bush was so incompetent.


Oh, by the way? *The person who nominated him and pushed it?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...usa/barackobam...

Here's a choice quote - one of many.

ROFLMAO!! anyone can nominate anyone for the nobel peace prize.

and that's a busted link



"The majority of women around the world associate gender justice, or
justice for women, with sharia compliance."

and george bush's fundamentalist view of christianity?

how'd that work out?

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:41:58 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 9, 10:41*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 05:42:55 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

he's winding down the war in iraq, moving to re-evaluate the failed
policies of his predecessor in afghanistan (which led nowhere for 7
years), is negotiating a nuclear arms reduction, the economy is
improving, he's moving on health care..

Oh please Bob - even you don't believe any of that. *He's trying to
figure out how to add more troops to a war that is getting more
unpopular by the second *- a WAR that he said was more important that
Iraq. *His words.

uh...let me see...you're saying he wants to add troops to a war he
thinks is important. and that proves he's not adding troops? and the
war is unpopular PRECISELY because bush was so incompetent.


Oh, by the way? *The person who nominated him and pushed it?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...usa/barackobam...

Here's a choice quote - one of many.

ROFLMAO!! anyone can nominate anyone for the nobel peace prize.

and that's a busted link



"The majority of women around the world associate gender justice, or
justice for women, with sharia compliance."

and george bush's fundamentalist view of christianity?

how'd that work out?

Man, you are really out of it.

Unfortunate - you seemed a pretty reasonable guy.

On Oct 9, 3:41*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:41:58 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Oct 9, 10:41*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 05:42:55 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

he's winding down the war in iraq, moving to re-evaluate the failed
policies of his predecessor in afghanistan (which led nowhere for 7
years), is negotiating a nuclear arms reduction, the economy is
improving, he's moving on health care..

Oh please Bob - even you don't believe any of that. *He's trying to
figure out how to add more troops to a war that is getting more
unpopular by the second *- a WAR that he said was more important that
Iraq. *His words.

uh...let me see...you're saying he wants to add troops to a war he
thinks is important. and that proves he's not adding troops? and the
war is unpopular PRECISELY because bush was so incompetent.

Oh, by the way? *The person who nominated him and pushed it?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...usa/barackobam....

Here's a choice quote - one of many.

ROFLMAO!! anyone can nominate anyone for the nobel peace prize.

and that's a busted link

"The majority of women around the world associate gender justice, or
justice for women, with sharia compliance."

and george bush's fundamentalist view of christianity?

how'd that work out?

Man, you are really out of it.

Unfortunate - you seemed a pretty reasonable guy.-

IOW you're clueless about the fact bush ran the afghan war for 7
years. and that's why it's in the shape it's in

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 05:42:55 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 9, 8:07 am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.

He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was
made on Feb 1st of this year. He hasn't even been in office for a
freakin' year yet.

Isreal is planning an Iranian raid, he's got two wars going, is also
preparing for an Iranian incursion, he hasn't passed any of his agenda
and isn't likely to, he's backed off on every single campaign promise
he made including Gitmo, the economy is a wreck, Chrysler is doing
down the tubes as fast as you can say it with GM right behind, thrown
more of his homies under the bus than you can count, kept his mouth
shut about the Georgian/Russian conflict, threw the Iranians under the
bus when they revolted, backing a corrupt politician in Honduras, lost
the Olympics for Chicago and he wins a Peace Prize?

There isn't anybody else in the world working for peace that deserved
the prize?

It's a joke - has to be. Only it's not April.
he's winding down the war in iraq, moving to re-evaluate the failed
policies of his predecessor in afghanistan (which led nowhere for 7
years), is negotiating a nuclear arms reduction, the economy is
improving, he's moving on health care..

Oh please Bob - even you don't believe any of that. He's trying to
figure out how to add more troops to a war that is getting more
unpopular by the second - a WAR that he said was more important that
Iraq. His words.

Oh, by the way? The person who nominated him and pushed it?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...nderstood.html

Here's a choice quote - one of many.

"The majority of women around the world associate gender justice, or
justice for women, with sharia compliance."

Really. How about that. Under shari’a law, a woman’s testimony in
court only counts for half of that of a man. If a woman is raped, she
needs four male witnesses to prove her case. If she makes the
accusation and doesn’t find four witnesses, the victim gets charged
with fornication or adultery and faces death.

She also believes that women should not be in public office. I wonder
if she knows "Mam" Boxer or Botox Pelosi?

Come on man, you're smarter than that.

Anyone who supports sharia law is a sexist and a racist. Sharia law is
about discrimination, power and control and a *******ization of the word
justice. It is about culture control by the powerful. Sort of like
Salem witch hunts. Don't like someone? Witch hunt time. If they
drown, I guess we were wrong.

Tehy should make the men wear the symbol of oppression, make men mask
their faces.

On 10/11/09 12:21 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

Anyone who supports sharia law is a sexist and a racist. Sharia law is
about discrimination, power and control and a *******ization of the word
justice. It is about culture control by the powerful. Sort of like Salem
witch hunts. Don't like someone? Witch hunt time. If they drown, I guess
we were wrong.



Sounds like what the christian right in this country does to control
women and their reproductive rights and bodies.


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

On Oct 9, 8:07*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.

He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was
made on Feb 1st of this year. *He hasn't even been in office for a
freakin' year yet.

Isreal is planning an Iranian raid, he's got two wars going, is also
preparing for an Iranian incursion, he hasn't passed any of his agenda
and isn't likely to, he's backed off on every single campaign promise
he made including Gitmo, *the economy is a wreck, Chrysler is doing
down the tubes as fast as you can say it with GM right behind, thrown
more of his homies under the bus than you can count, kept his mouth
shut about the Georgian/Russian conflict, threw the Iranians under the
bus when they revolted, backing a corrupt politician in Honduras, lost
the Olympics for Chicago and he wins a Peace Prize?

There isn't anybody else in the world working for peace that deserved
the prize?

It's a joke - has to be. *Only it's not April.

This could explain it:

"- Myth: The prize is awarded to recognize efforts for peace, human
rights and democracy only after they have proven successful."

"More often, the prize is awarded to encourage those who receive it to
see the effort through, sometimes at critical moments."

IOW, they hope he will change.

On 10/9/09 8:50 AM, Jack wrote:
On Oct 9, 8:07 am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.

He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was
made on Feb 1st of this year. He hasn't even been in office for a
freakin' year yet.

Isreal is planning an Iranian raid, he's got two wars going, is also
preparing for an Iranian incursion, he hasn't passed any of his agenda
and isn't likely to, he's backed off on every single campaign promise
he made including Gitmo, the economy is a wreck, Chrysler is doing
down the tubes as fast as you can say it with GM right behind, thrown
more of his homies under the bus than you can count, kept his mouth
shut about the Georgian/Russian conflict, threw the Iranians under the
bus when they revolted, backing a corrupt politician in Honduras, lost
the Olympics for Chicago and he wins a Peace Prize?

There isn't anybody else in the world working for peace that deserved
the prize?

It's a joke - has to be. Only it's not April.

This could explain it:

"- Myth: The prize is awarded to recognize efforts for peace, human
rights and democracy only after they have proven successful."

"More often, the prize is awarded to encourage those who receive it to
see the effort through, sometimes at critical moments."

IOW, they hope he will change.


Republicans hate America but hate peace even more.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All