On 10/9/09 10:57 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:42:10 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:13:17 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/9/09 8:07 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.


Heheheh...I was hoping this would give the righties apoplexy...and it is.

Wouldn't it be nicer, though, if he had actually had the time to EARN
the recognition? Why be in such haste?

It's obvious - they've lost thier collective minds.

And even the Left is wondering what the hell happened.

"The time has not yet arrived and circumstances have not yet evolved
where Barack Obama is anywhere near the point where he has earned this
prize. I don't blame him for this capricious action; it was the Nobel
Peace Committee which committed the offense, which no doubt has Alfred
Nobel thumping his head against his casket."

Read more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michae..._b_314899.html

Anybody want to bet he wins the Literature prize for "Dreams of My
Father"? It would make as much sense.

And we're finally getting Obama jokes - and we all know what happens
when a President becomes the butt of jokes.

Ezra Klein: Obama also awarded Nobel prize in chemistry. "He's just
got great chemistry," says Nobel Committee.

Barack Obama’s Teleprompter: Big Guy says Bill Clinton called and was
gracious in defeat; offered to fly Kanye West over 4 the Nobel awards
ceremony

Headline over AP analysis by White House correspondent Jennifer Loven:
He Won, But For What?

My personal favorite:

Erick Erickson: Obama is becoming Jimmy Carter faster than Jimmy
Carter became Jimmy Carter.


Well, there was talk for a Republican to win the peace prize, but no one
could find a GOP'er who was interested in peace.




--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:45:28 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/9/09 10:41 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

Oh please Bob - even you don't believe any of that. He's trying to
figure out how to add more troops to a war that is getting more
unpopular by the second - a WAR that he said was more important that
Iraq. His words.


Poor Tom...he's drowning in a vat full of sour grapes.

In your 'opinion,' it's not that Tom laments the travesty that the
Nobel Peace Prize, a once, fairly meritorious award, has become.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On 9-Oct-2009, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.

He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was
made on Feb 1st of this year. He hasn't even been in office for a
freakin' year yet.

Makes nuthin but sense! Now he's under pressure to pull out of Afghanistan,
or he's seen as a war monger. He's in deep doo doo - by design by the
assholes in Oslo. If he sends more troops for the enemy to kill while being
prohibited from being on the offensive, the bedwetters will squeal. Rest
assured the jerk isn't happy about this event.

He SHOULD get out of VietGhanistan.

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 15:02:01 GMT, "Steve"
wrote:


On 9-Oct-2009, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.

He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was
made on Feb 1st of this year. He hasn't even been in office for a
freakin' year yet.

Makes nuthin but sense! Now he's under pressure to pull out of Afghanistan,
or he's seen as a war monger. He's in deep doo doo - by design by the
assholes in Oslo. If he sends more troops for the enemy to kill while being
prohibited from being on the offensive, the bedwetters will squeal. Rest
assured the jerk isn't happy about this event.

I just saw an analysis of that - it makes perfect sense.

He SHOULD get out of VietGhanistan.

We can hold the line in Afghanistan, but win it? No way.

Again, we don't have the boots on the ground - just like Iraq under
Bone Brain Rumsfield.

On 9-Oct-2009, H the K wrote:

My personal favorite:

Erick Erickson: Obama is becoming Jimmy Carter faster than Jimmy
Carter became Jimmy Carter.


Well, there was talk for a Republican to win the peace prize, but no one
could find a GOP'er who was interested in peace.

Why would ANYONE covet joining a fraternity with similarly "awarded" members
like Idiot Carter and Yasshole Arafat???

On 10/9/09 11:15 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 15:02:01 GMT,
wrote:


On 9-Oct-2009, Tom Francis -
wrote:

I'm sorry folks, but this doesn't make any sense.

He had been in office for exactly TWO WEEKS before the selection was
made on Feb 1st of this year. He hasn't even been in office for a
freakin' year yet.

Makes nuthin but sense! Now he's under pressure to pull out of Afghanistan,
or he's seen as a war monger. He's in deep doo doo - by design by the
assholes in Oslo. If he sends more troops for the enemy to kill while being
prohibited from being on the offensive, the bedwetters will squeal. Rest
assured the jerk isn't happy about this event.

I just saw an analysis of that - it makes perfect sense.

He SHOULD get out of VietGhanistan.

We can hold the line in Afghanistan, but win it? No way.

Again, we don't have the boots on the ground - just like Iraq under
Bone Brain Rumsfield.


It wouldn't matter how many boots we had on the ground in Afghanistan.


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

On 9-Oct-2009, H the K wrote:

Again, we don't have the boots on the ground - just like Iraq under
Bone Brain Rumsfield.


It wouldn't matter how many boots we had on the ground in Afghanistan.

That's correct! Good going - one out of a hundred is a start!

Morons like Bush and Obama think they need to kill or suppress the
"evildoers" or in more stupid terms, the "insurgents." What is being fought
is a culture. It will never, ever succeed.

In article ,
says...

On 9-Oct-2009, H the K wrote:

My personal favorite:

Erick Erickson: Obama is becoming Jimmy Carter faster than Jimmy
Carter became Jimmy Carter.


Well, there was talk for a Republican to win the peace prize, but no one
could find a GOP'er who was interested in peace.

Why would ANYONE covet joining a fraternity with similarly "awarded" members
like Idiot Carter and Yasshole Arafat???

The Nobel Peace prize is not given for peace, or accomplishments. It's a
Joke and is only given to folks who see the world the way the idiots on
the committee do... It's just another private club for "one worlders".

On 10/9/09 11:58 AM, Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On 9-Oct-2009, H the wrote:

My personal favorite:

Erick Erickson: Obama is becoming Jimmy Carter faster than Jimmy
Carter became Jimmy Carter.


Well, there was talk for a Republican to win the peace prize, but no one
could find a GOP'er who was interested in peace.

Why would ANYONE covet joining a fraternity with similarly "awarded" members
like Idiot Carter and Yasshole Arafat???

The Nobel Peace prize is not given for peace, or accomplishments. It's a
Joke and is only given to folks who see the world the way the idiots on
the committee do... It's just another private club for "one worlders".



Ahhh...it's always helpful to have the moron view of the world so ably
presented by a moron...like Scott Ingersoll.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

In article ,
says...

On 9-Oct-2009, H the K wrote:

Again, we don't have the boots on the ground - just like Iraq under
Bone Brain Rumsfield.


It wouldn't matter how many boots we had on the ground in Afghanistan.

That's correct! Good going - one out of a hundred is a start!

Morons like Bush and Obama think they need to kill or suppress the
"evildoers" or in more stupid terms, the "insurgents." What is being fought
is a culture. It will never, ever succeed.

Now it's you putting all Muslims in the same pot (racist) when it's only
a few who are really in need of a bullet, not a whole "culture"...

If you can convince the real Muslims that they can be protected, or
protect themselves, or have a government that will protect them, they
will solve the problem, just like we did here in the US with the KKK...
But there will always be individuals who are following some far off
agenda and will need to be suppressed.