On Oct 3, 8:30*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
do any of you really think that we need a healthcare bill that the
people in charge of producing don't understand?

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/54930

Seriously?

what makes you think people understand the healthcare system we have
now?

On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:46:43 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 3, 8:30*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
do any of you really think that we need a healthcare bill that the
people in charge of producing don't understand?

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/54930

Seriously?

what makes you think people understand the healthcare system we have
now?

So making it more complex is better? Wouldn't you think that making
it simpler to deal with would be a better goal?

I don't have trouble understanding my insurance plan. I have a list
of what is and isn't covered, a formulary sheet that describes what is
covered fully/partially or not at all for prescriptions, a rate sheet
for reimbursement for my outlay, complete description of co-pays that
I'm responsible for and those procedures that are fully covered, a
contact person if I have questions.

How hard is it?

On 10/3/09 3:21 PM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:46:43 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 3, 8:30 am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
do any of you really think that we need a healthcare bill that the
people in charge of producing don't understand?

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/54930

Seriously?

what makes you think people understand the healthcare system we have
now?

So making it more complex is better? Wouldn't you think that making
it simpler to deal with would be a better goal?

I don't have trouble understanding my insurance plan. I have a list
of what is and isn't covered, a formulary sheet that describes what is
covered fully/partially or not at all for prescriptions, a rate sheet
for reimbursement for my outlay, complete description of co-pays that
I'm responsible for and those procedures that are fully covered, a
contact person if I have questions.

How hard is it?


I have a card. Everything in the hospital is covered, including a
semi-private room. Doctor's office visits are covered, with a $10
co-pay. Generic prescriptions require a $5 co-pay, non-generics require
a 20% co-pay. Cosmetic surgery for vanity reasons is not covered, but it
is covered to reconstruct after a disease or an accident. Oh, yeah...80%
of my lasik eye surgery was covered 10 years ago. No need to read
complicated rate sheets, because it all fits on one side of one sheet of
paper. If there's a change, the administrator sends out a note.
Oh...there's a $200 annual deductible.

Unfortunately, most Americans do not have the sort of friendly health
insurance I have.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

On Oct 3, 3:04*pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/3/09 3:21 PM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:



On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:46:43 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 3, 8:30 am, Tom Francis - SWSports
*wrote:
do any of you really think that we need a healthcare bill that the
people in charge of producing don't understand?

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/54930

Seriously?

what makes you think people understand the healthcare system we have
now?

So making it more complex is better? *Wouldn't you think that making
it simpler to deal with would be a better goal?

I don't have trouble understanding my insurance plan. *I have a list
of what is and isn't covered, a formulary sheet that describes what is
covered fully/partially or not at all for prescriptions, a rate sheet
for reimbursement for my outlay, complete description of co-pays that
I'm responsible for and those procedures that are fully covered, a
contact person if I have questions.

How hard is it?

I have a card. Everything in the hospital is covered, including a
semi-private room. Doctor's office visits are covered, with a $10
co-pay. Generic prescriptions require a $5 co-pay, non-generics require
a 20% co-pay. Cosmetic surgery for vanity reasons is not covered, but it
is covered to reconstruct after a disease or an accident. Oh, yeah...80%
of my lasik eye surgery was covered 10 years ago. No need to read
complicated rate sheets, because it all fits on one side of one sheet of
paper. If there's a change, the administrator sends out a note.
Oh...there's a $200 annual deductible.

Unfortunately, most Americans do not have the sort of friendly health
insurance I have.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

Herr Krause. most of your fellow citizens don't have a green card like
yours, either.

But no fear. In time that too shall come to pass.

H the K wrote:
On 10/3/09 3:21 PM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:46:43 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 3, 8:30 am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
do any of you really think that we need a healthcare bill that the
people in charge of producing don't understand?

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/54930

Seriously?

what makes you think people understand the healthcare system we have
now?

So making it more complex is better? Wouldn't you think that making
it simpler to deal with would be a better goal?

I don't have trouble understanding my insurance plan. I have a list
of what is and isn't covered, a formulary sheet that describes what is
covered fully/partially or not at all for prescriptions, a rate sheet
for reimbursement for my outlay, complete description of co-pays that
I'm responsible for and those procedures that are fully covered, a
contact person if I have questions.

How hard is it?


I have a card. Everything in the hospital is covered, including a
semi-private room. Doctor's office visits are covered, with a $10
co-pay. Generic prescriptions require a $5 co-pay, non-generics require
a 20% co-pay. Cosmetic surgery for vanity reasons is not covered, but it
is covered to reconstruct after a disease or an accident. Oh, yeah...80%
of my lasik eye surgery was covered 10 years ago. No need to read
complicated rate sheets, because it all fits on one side of one sheet of
paper. If there's a change, the administrator sends out a note.
Oh...there's a $200 annual deductible.

Unfortunately, most Americans do not have the sort of friendly health
insurance I have.


And neither will you, if the Obamanation administration has their say.
Enjoy it while you can, WAFA!

On Oct 3, 7:38*pm, The D wrote:
H the K wrote:


Unfortunately, most Americans do not have the sort of friendly health
insurance I have.

And neither will you, if the Obamanation administration has their say.
Enjoy it while you can, WAFA!-

chuckle guess you just think folks who are unemployed shouldn't get
health insurance at all

wf3h wrote:
On Oct 3, 7:38 pm, The D wrote:
H the K wrote:

Unfortunately, most Americans do not have the sort of friendly health
insurance I have.
And neither will you, if the Obamanation administration has their say.
Enjoy it while you can, WAFA!-

chuckle guess you just think folks who are unemployed shouldn't get
health insurance at all

Really? The illegal aliens have better health coverage than me - they
pay *nothing* and clog our "emergency" rooms. The unemployed Americans
aren't denied that same health care.

On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 21:12:38 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 3, 7:38*pm, The D wrote:
H the K wrote:


Unfortunately, most Americans do not have the sort of friendly health
insurance I have.

And neither will you, if the Obamanation administration has their say.
Enjoy it while you can, WAFA!-

chuckle guess you just think folks who are unemployed shouldn't get
health insurance at all

Should we all get the same health care coverage and quality of
treatment that our legislators do?

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 21:12:38 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 3, 7:38*pm, The D wrote:
H the K wrote:


Unfortunately, most Americans do not have the sort of friendly health
insurance I have.

And neither will you, if the Obamanation administration has their say.
Enjoy it while you can, WAFA!-

chuckle guess you just think folks who are unemployed shouldn't get
health insurance at all

Should we all get the same health care coverage and quality of
treatment that our legislators do?

We should have the same options and they should not have options we
have, that's the sneaky part when they are asked. They always say "we
will have the same options as you", but will not say if we will have the
same options as they do... watch carefully next time one is asked...

On Oct 3, 3:21*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:46:43 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 3, 8:30*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
do any of you really think that we need a healthcare bill that the
people in charge of producing don't understand?

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/54930

Seriously?

what makes you think people understand the healthcare system we have
now?

So making it more complex is better? *Wouldn't you think that making
it simpler to deal with would be a better goal?

what makes you think they aren't? and who said simple is better?

I don't have trouble understanding my insurance plan. *I have a list
of what is and isn't covered, a formulary sheet that describes what is
covered fully/partially or not at all for prescriptions, a rate sheet
for reimbursement for my outlay, complete description of co-pays that
I'm responsible for and those procedures that are fully covered, a
contact person if I have questions.

and that will be issued with the new plan.