"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:55:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:21:11 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Stupid article and inaccurate. There were certainly other attacks during
Bush's presidency... e.g., the anthrax attacks,

In all fairness you have to admit the anthrax was home grown, a
disgruntled Ft Dietrick employee. That is like blaming Clinton for
Oklahoma city.



We didn't know that at the time and even if it was, he certainly didn't
protect us by his extensive vacation schedule.

More Christmas Goose material.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.


You're denying he spent 3 years of his 8 on vacation? It's pretty well
documented.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:55:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:21:11 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Stupid article and inaccurate. There were certainly other attacks during
Bush's presidency... e.g., the anthrax attacks,
In all fairness you have to admit the anthrax was home grown, a
disgruntled Ft Dietrick employee. That is like blaming Clinton for
Oklahoma city.


We didn't know that at the time and even if it was, he certainly didn't
protect us by his extensive vacation schedule.
More Christmas Goose material.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.


You're denying he spent 3 years of his 8 on vacation? It's pretty well
documented.

You're putting words in his mouth. Perhaps he should put something of
his in your mouth.

On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:05:17 -0400, Jim wrote:


You're putting words in his mouth. Perhaps he should put something of
his in your mouth.

Sweet, one of the lowest levels of discourse I've seen on this forum.
How do you rationalize this with your Christian beliefs?

thunder wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:05:17 -0400, Jim wrote:

Sweet, one of the lowest levels of discourse I've seen on this forum.
How do you rationalize this with your Christian beliefs?

It was crass. I apologize to the group.

"Jim" wrote in message
...
thunder wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:05:17 -0400, Jim wrote:

Sweet, one of the lowest levels of discourse I've seen on this forum.
How do you rationalize this with your Christian beliefs?

It was crass. I apologize to the group.


Thanks.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
thunder wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:05:17 -0400, Jim wrote:
Sweet, one of the lowest levels of discourse I've seen on this forum.
How do you rationalize this with your Christian beliefs?
It was crass. I apologize to the group.


Thanks.

To you too.

"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:05:17 -0400, Jim wrote:


You're putting words in his mouth. Perhaps he should put something of
his in your mouth.

Sweet, one of the lowest levels of discourse I've seen on this forum.
How do you rationalize this with your Christian beliefs?


I was just thinking that. I have a feeling that he's a Christian in name
only. Jesus would never condone such a comment.

I'm a Christian, and I would never say something like this to a political
adversary or anyone else, and I would certainly never say it in such a
cowardly way... mostly anonymously and in public.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:29:36 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:05:17 -0400, Jim wrote:


You're putting words in his mouth. Perhaps he should put something of
his in your mouth.

Sweet, one of the lowest levels of discourse I've seen on this forum.
How do you rationalize this with your Christian beliefs?

You're right.

Now, I'll keep waiting for you to say something to slammer or Harry
for comments that are much worse than this.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:29:36 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:05:17 -0400, Jim wrote:


You're putting words in his mouth. Perhaps he should put something of
his in your mouth.

Sweet, one of the lowest levels of discourse I've seen on this forum.
How do you rationalize this with your Christian beliefs?

You're right.

Now, I'll keep waiting for you to say something to slammer or Harry
for comments that are much worse than this.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.


I would be happy to say something more vociferously to Harry if his comments
were directed toward me. Several times I've said that I don't condone
name-calling. That's what I teach the kids. Not sure who slammer is.

Harry, don't be so mean. Now, John... perhaps you an Jim should try to share
the cookies.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:55:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:21:11 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Stupid article and inaccurate. There were certainly other attacks
during
Bush's presidency... e.g., the anthrax attacks,
In all fairness you have to admit the anthrax was home grown, a
disgruntled Ft Dietrick employee. That is like blaming Clinton for
Oklahoma city.


We didn't know that at the time and even if it was, he certainly didn't
protect us by his extensive vacation schedule.
More Christmas Goose material.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary
thinking.


You're denying he spent 3 years of his 8 on vacation? It's pretty well
documented.

You're putting words in his mouth. Perhaps he should put something of his
in your mouth.


Ah ha! Flatulent Jims true self escaping.