Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:24:45 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Sep 29, 11:47 pm, Jack wrote: Within the United States and as delineated in the National Response Plan, response and planning is first and foremost a local government responsibility. which, of course, is a non sequitur. there's not a local govt in the US that could handle a disaster like katrina. the feds, under bush, ignored FEMA and appointed a horse lawyer to head the agency....they didn't take it seriously Any shine you may have had has quickly worn off... you've become another insincere, disingenuous non-boating liberal shill in this NG. fine. you let me know how your local govt would deal with a disaster like katrina. go ahead...we'll wait I think the point was that since protocol dictated that the federal government, as Jack has presented it, was to defer to the local governments in taking the lead in managing in the face of a natural disaster, they did so, but encouraged the respective local governments to appeal for federal assistance through pre-defined channels. According to Jack's information, the local governments failed to do so in an timely and sagacious manner. In other words, a case can be made that for the Bush administration, it was damned if you do and damned if you don't - if you comprehended what Jack wrote. Well, Blackwater had no problem deploying. They were first on the scene. Of course, they didn't do much for the people in trouble, unless you count the big companies' facilities they were protecting. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/30/09 1:28 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:24:45 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Sep 29, 11:47 pm, wrote: Within the United States and as delineated in the National Response Plan, response and planning is first and foremost a local government responsibility. which, of course, is a non sequitur. there's not a local govt in the US that could handle a disaster like katrina. the feds, under bush, ignored FEMA and appointed a horse lawyer to head the agency....they didn't take it seriously Any shine you may have had has quickly worn off... you've become another insincere, disingenuous non-boating liberal shill in this NG. fine. you let me know how your local govt would deal with a disaster like katrina. go ahead...we'll wait I think the point was that since protocol dictated that the federal government, as Jack has presented it, was to defer to the local governments in taking the lead in managing in the face of a natural disaster, they did so, but encouraged the respective local governments to appeal for federal assistance through pre-defined channels. According to Jack's information, the local governments failed to do so in an timely and sagacious manner. In other words, a case can be made that for the Bush administration, it was damned if you do and damned if you don't - if you comprehended what Jack wrote. Well, Blackwater had no problem deploying. They were first on the scene. Of course, they didn't do much for the people in trouble, unless you count the big companies' facilities they were protecting. Blackwater is a criminal enterprise. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
President Pantywaist bravely does .....NOTHING? | General | |||
Our next president | General | |||
I am the President! | ASA | |||
( OT) Help your president | General | |||
( OT ) Do we have a gay president? | General |