Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 29, 11:47*pm, Jack wrote:
Within the United States and as delineated in the National Response Plan, response and planning is first and foremost a local government responsibility. which, of course, is a non sequitur. there's not a local govt in the US that could handle a disaster like katrina. the feds, under bush, ignored FEMA and appointed a horse lawyer to head the agency....they didn't take it seriously Any shine you may have had has quickly worn off... you've become another insincere, disingenuous non-boating liberal shill in this NG. fine. you let me know how your local govt would deal with a disaster like katrina. go ahead...we'll wait |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:24:45 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote: On Sep 29, 11:47*pm, Jack wrote: Within the United States and as delineated in the National Response Plan, response and planning is first and foremost a local government responsibility. which, of course, is a non sequitur. there's not a local govt in the US that could handle a disaster like katrina. the feds, under bush, ignored FEMA and appointed a horse lawyer to head the agency....they didn't take it seriously Any shine you may have had has quickly worn off... you've become another insincere, disingenuous non-boating liberal shill in this NG. fine. you let me know how your local govt would deal with a disaster like katrina. go ahead...we'll wait I think the point was that since protocol dictated that the federal government, as Jack has presented it, was to defer to the local governments in taking the lead in managing in the face of a natural disaster, they did so, but encouraged the respective local governments to appeal for federal assistance through pre-defined channels. According to Jack's information, the local governments failed to do so in an timely and sagacious manner. In other words, a case can be made that for the Bush administration, it was damned if you do and damned if you don't - if you comprehended what Jack wrote. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 8:24*am, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:24:45 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Sep 29, 11:47*pm, Jack wrote: Within the United States and as delineated in the National Response Plan, response and planning is first and foremost a local government responsibility. which, of course, is a non sequitur. *there's not a local govt in the US that could handle a disaster like katrina. the feds, under bush, ignored FEMA and appointed a horse lawyer to head the agency....they didn't take it seriously Any shine you may have had has quickly worn off... you've become another insincere, disingenuous non-boating liberal shill in this NG. fine. you let me know how your local govt would deal with a disaster like katrina. go ahead...we'll wait I think the point was that since protocol dictated that the federal government, as Jack has presented it, was to defer to the local governments in taking the lead in managing in the face of a natural disaster, they did so, but encouraged the respective local governments to appeal for federal assistance through pre-defined channels. According to Jack's information, the local governments failed to do so in an timely and sagacious manner. *In other words, a case can be made that for the Bush administration, it was damned if you do and damned if you don't - if you comprehended what Jack wrote. -- this went on for months. and no local govt can handle a hurricane. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:24:45 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Sep 29, 11:47 pm, Jack wrote: Within the United States and as delineated in the National Response Plan, response and planning is first and foremost a local government responsibility. which, of course, is a non sequitur. there's not a local govt in the US that could handle a disaster like katrina. the feds, under bush, ignored FEMA and appointed a horse lawyer to head the agency....they didn't take it seriously Any shine you may have had has quickly worn off... you've become another insincere, disingenuous non-boating liberal shill in this NG. fine. you let me know how your local govt would deal with a disaster like katrina. go ahead...we'll wait I think the point was that since protocol dictated that the federal government, as Jack has presented it, was to defer to the local governments in taking the lead in managing in the face of a natural disaster, they did so, but encouraged the respective local governments to appeal for federal assistance through pre-defined channels. According to Jack's information, the local governments failed to do so in an timely and sagacious manner. In other words, a case can be made that for the Bush administration, it was damned if you do and damned if you don't - if you comprehended what Jack wrote. Well, Blackwater had no problem deploying. They were first on the scene. Of course, they didn't do much for the people in trouble, unless you count the big companies' facilities they were protecting. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/30/09 1:28 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:24:45 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Sep 29, 11:47 pm, wrote: Within the United States and as delineated in the National Response Plan, response and planning is first and foremost a local government responsibility. which, of course, is a non sequitur. there's not a local govt in the US that could handle a disaster like katrina. the feds, under bush, ignored FEMA and appointed a horse lawyer to head the agency....they didn't take it seriously Any shine you may have had has quickly worn off... you've become another insincere, disingenuous non-boating liberal shill in this NG. fine. you let me know how your local govt would deal with a disaster like katrina. go ahead...we'll wait I think the point was that since protocol dictated that the federal government, as Jack has presented it, was to defer to the local governments in taking the lead in managing in the face of a natural disaster, they did so, but encouraged the respective local governments to appeal for federal assistance through pre-defined channels. According to Jack's information, the local governments failed to do so in an timely and sagacious manner. In other words, a case can be made that for the Bush administration, it was damned if you do and damned if you don't - if you comprehended what Jack wrote. Well, Blackwater had no problem deploying. They were first on the scene. Of course, they didn't do much for the people in trouble, unless you count the big companies' facilities they were protecting. Blackwater is a criminal enterprise. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 7:24*am, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 29, 11:47*pm, Jack wrote: Within the United States and as delineated in the National Response Plan, response and planning is first and foremost a local government responsibility. which, of course, is a non sequitur. *there's not a local govt in the US that could handle a disaster like katrina. the feds, under bush, ignored FEMA and appointed a horse lawyer to head the agency....they didn't take it seriously No local gov has to by themselves... they just have to ask for assistance from the feds. Nagel and Blanco did not. Any shine you may have had has quickly worn off... you've become another insincere, disingenuous non-boating liberal shill in this NG. fine. you let me know how your local govt would deal with a disaster like katrina. go ahead...we'll wait Reference Hugo... The SC gov asked for federal assistance in a timely manner, evacuated it's citizens before landfall, and was as ready as it could be. They did what they needed, and were supposed to do. Nagel and Blanco failed miserably in NO. Bush tried to get them to let feds take over, and they refused. Two days after landfall, they finally asked for federal assistance. The blood is on their hands. Oh, and they are Demoncrats. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 9:54*am, Jack wrote:
On Sep 30, 7:24*am, wf3h wrote: On Sep 29, 11:47*pm, Jack wrote: Within the United States and as delineated in the National Response Plan, response and planning is first and foremost a local government responsibility. which, of course, is a non sequitur. *there's not a local govt in the US that could handle a disaster like katrina. the feds, under bush, ignored FEMA and appointed a horse lawyer to head the agency....they didn't take it seriously No local gov has to by themselves... they just have to ask for assistance from the feds. *Nagel and Blanco did not. Any shine you may have had has quickly worn off... you've become another insincere, disingenuous non-boating liberal shill in this NG. fine. you let me know how your local govt would deal with a disaster like katrina. go ahead...we'll wait Reference Hugo... The SC gov asked for federal assistance in a timely manner, evacuated it's citizens before landfall, and was as ready as it could be. *They did what they needed, and were supposed to do. Nagel and Blanco failed miserably in NO. *Bush tried to get them to let feds take over, and they refused. *Two days after landfall, they finally asked for federal assistance. *The blood is on their hands. Oh, and they are Demoncrats. uh...no. as i said, for months this went on. trailers that had toxic fumes...and the federal assistance they asked for was never forthcoming. instead, 'brownie', the FEMA head, appeared on TV to tell everyone everything was OK and he's a republican. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 11:03*am, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 30, 9:54*am, Jack wrote: On Sep 30, 7:24*am, wf3h wrote: On Sep 29, 11:47*pm, Jack wrote: Within the United States and as delineated in the National Response Plan, response and planning is first and foremost a local government responsibility. which, of course, is a non sequitur. *there's not a local govt in the US that could handle a disaster like katrina. the feds, under bush, ignored FEMA and appointed a horse lawyer to head the agency....they didn't take it seriously No local gov has to by themselves... they just have to ask for assistance from the feds. *Nagel and Blanco did not. Any shine you may have had has quickly worn off... you've become another insincere, disingenuous non-boating liberal shill in this NG. fine. you let me know how your local govt would deal with a disaster like katrina. go ahead...we'll wait Reference Hugo... The SC gov asked for federal assistance in a timely manner, evacuated it's citizens before landfall, and was as ready as it could be. *They did what they needed, and were supposed to do. Nagel and Blanco failed miserably in NO. *Bush tried to get them to let feds take over, and they refused. *Two days after landfall, they finally asked for federal assistance. *The blood is on their hands. Oh, and they are Demoncrats. uh...no. as i said, for months this went on. trailers that had toxic fumes...and the federal assistance they asked for was never forthcoming. instead, 'brownie', the FEMA head, appeared on TV to tell everyone everything was OK and he's a republican. FEMA has had issues for years. Under Clinton's watch: "The Hurricane Floyd disaster was followed by what many judged to be a very slow federal response. Fully three weeks after the storm hit, Jesse Jackson complained to FEMA Director James Lee Witt on his CNN program Both Sides Now, "It seemed there was preparation for Hurricane Floyd, but then came Flood Floyd. Bridges are overwhelmed, levees are overwhelmed, whole towns under water ... [it's] an awesome scene of tragedy. So there's a great misery index in North Carolina." Witt responded, "We're starting to move the camper trailers in. It's been so wet it's been difficult to get things in there, but now it's going to be moving very quickly. And I think you're going to see a—I think the people there will see a big difference [within] this next weekend!" On TV telling everyone everything is gonna be OK... |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack wrote:
On Sep 30, 7:24 am, wf3h wrote: On Sep 29, 11:47 pm, Jack wrote: Within the United States and as delineated in the National Response Plan, response and planning is first and foremost a local government responsibility. which, of course, is a non sequitur. there's not a local govt in the US that could handle a disaster like katrina. the feds, under bush, ignored FEMA and appointed a horse lawyer to head the agency....they didn't take it seriously No local gov has to by themselves... they just have to ask for assistance from the feds. Nagel and Blanco did not. Any shine you may have had has quickly worn off... you've become another insincere, disingenuous non-boating liberal shill in this NG. fine. you let me know how your local govt would deal with a disaster like katrina. go ahead...we'll wait Reference Hugo... The SC gov asked for federal assistance in a timely manner, evacuated it's citizens before landfall, and was as ready as it could be. They did what they needed, and were supposed to do. Nagel and Blanco failed miserably in NO. Bush tried to get them to let feds take over, and they refused. Two days after landfall, they finally asked for federal assistance. The blood is on their hands. Oh, and they are Demoncrats. The National Weather Service tried to put the fear of god into those people a full 3 days in advance of that disaster. What in the world were those people thinking? They must have been waiting for the big black government limousines to come and pick them up and carry them to safety. There is a downside to demanding cradle to grave Government guidance and protection. I hope we learn that lesson before it's too late. Maybe it's too late already. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim" wrote in message
... Jack wrote: On Sep 30, 7:24 am, wf3h wrote: On Sep 29, 11:47 pm, Jack wrote: Within the United States and as delineated in the National Response Plan, response and planning is first and foremost a local government responsibility. which, of course, is a non sequitur. there's not a local govt in the US that could handle a disaster like katrina. the feds, under bush, ignored FEMA and appointed a horse lawyer to head the agency....they didn't take it seriously No local gov has to by themselves... they just have to ask for assistance from the feds. Nagel and Blanco did not. Any shine you may have had has quickly worn off... you've become another insincere, disingenuous non-boating liberal shill in this NG. fine. you let me know how your local govt would deal with a disaster like katrina. go ahead...we'll wait Reference Hugo... The SC gov asked for federal assistance in a timely manner, evacuated it's citizens before landfall, and was as ready as it could be. They did what they needed, and were supposed to do. Nagel and Blanco failed miserably in NO. Bush tried to get them to let feds take over, and they refused. Two days after landfall, they finally asked for federal assistance. The blood is on their hands. Oh, and they are Demoncrats. The National Weather Service tried to put the fear of god into those people a full 3 days in advance of that disaster. What in the world were those people thinking? They must have been waiting for the big black government limousines to come and pick them up and carry them to safety. There is a downside to demanding cradle to grave Government guidance and protection. I hope we learn that lesson before it's too late. Maybe it's too late already. Yeah, the poor had lots of way out. All of them by bus that too them to the sports arena. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
President Pantywaist bravely does .....NOTHING? | General | |||
Our next president | General | |||
I am the President! | ASA | |||
( OT) Help your president | General | |||
( OT ) Do we have a gay president? | General |