President Pantywaist
 

On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:29:36 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:05:17 -0400, Jim wrote:


You're putting words in his mouth. Perhaps he should put something of
his in your mouth.

Sweet, one of the lowest levels of discourse I've seen on this forum.
How do you rationalize this with your Christian beliefs?

You're right.

Now, I'll keep waiting for you to say something to slammer or Harry
for comments that are much worse than this.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

President Pantywaist
 

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:36:30 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Sep 30, 12:31 pm, JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:55:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume"





wrote:
wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:21:11 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Stupid article and inaccurate. There were certainly other attacks
during
Bush's presidency... e.g., the anthrax attacks,

In all fairness you have to admit the anthrax was home grown, a
disgruntled Ft Dietrick employee. That is like blaming Clinton for
Oklahoma city.

We didn't know that at the time and even if it was, he certainly didn't
protect us by his extensive vacation schedule.

More Christmas Goose material.
--
John H

John, it's shown itself to be nothing more than a liberal sock puppet,
spouting lies straight out of the lemming playbook. Best to plonk the
boatless shill.

GMTA!

Already done.
--
John H


My my. Johnny must think he's back in the army.
When things get tough...fold & run.

President Pantywaist
 

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
I have to hand it to you, m'lady...you've got the right-wingers here
droolin'n'typin'.


This would be in the TMI category... lol

--
Nom=de=Plume

President Pantywaist
 

"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
Jack wrote:
On Sep 30, 7:24 am, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 29, 11:47 pm, Jack wrote:



Within the United States and as delineated in the National Response
Plan, response and planning is first and foremost a local
government
responsibility.
which, of course, is a non sequitur. there's not a local govt in
the
US that could handle a disaster like katrina. the feds, under bush,
ignored FEMA and appointed a horse lawyer to head the agency....they
didn't take it seriously
No local gov has to by themselves... they just have to ask for
assistance from the feds. Nagel and Blanco did not.


Any shine you may have had has quickly worn off... you've become
another insincere, disingenuous non-boating liberal shill in this
NG.
fine. you let me know how your local govt would deal with a disaster
like katrina. go ahead...we'll wait
Reference Hugo... The SC gov asked for federal assistance in a timely
manner, evacuated it's citizens before landfall, and was as ready as
it could be. They did what they needed, and were supposed to do.

Nagel and Blanco failed miserably in NO. Bush tried to get them to
let feds take over, and they refused. Two days after landfall, they
finally asked for federal assistance. The blood is on their hands.
Oh, and they are Demoncrats.
The National Weather Service tried to put the fear of god into those
people a full 3 days in advance of that disaster. What in the world
were those people thinking? They must have been waiting for the big
black government limousines to come and pick them up and carry them to
safety. There is a downside to demanding cradle to grave Government
guidance and protection. I hope we learn that lesson before it's too
late. Maybe it's too late already.

Yeah, the poor had lots of way out. All of them by bus that too them to
the sports arena.

Calm down Tootsie. You're starting to make typos. Check the timeline of
the days before K day and report back what preparations were made by
state and local government. Could those busses have been used to
transport the disadvantaged to a location a little safer and cleaner
than the downtown sports arena. Did the democratic state and local
administrations do anything to aid and comfort their people? If so,
what?


Calm down Jimmy Bob. I'm probably smarter than you. I know you want to
blame Democrats for everything, and Brownie had lots of experience with
horse law, and Bush can ride a horse, but that sort of logic belongs in a
comedy show and not in a logical argument.

You probably are smarter than me but you sure aren't using your head for
anything useful.


Hmmm... definitely a logic problem for that comment...

--
Nom=de=Plume

President Pantywaist
 

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:29:36 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:05:17 -0400, Jim wrote:


You're putting words in his mouth. Perhaps he should put something of
his in your mouth.

Sweet, one of the lowest levels of discourse I've seen on this forum.
How do you rationalize this with your Christian beliefs?

You're right.

Now, I'll keep waiting for you to say something to slammer or Harry
for comments that are much worse than this.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.


I would be happy to say something more vociferously to Harry if his comments
were directed toward me. Several times I've said that I don't condone
name-calling. That's what I teach the kids. Not sure who slammer is.

Harry, don't be so mean. Now, John... perhaps you an Jim should try to share
the cookies.

--
Nom=de=Plume

President Pantywaist
 

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:32:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:21:11 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Lu Powell" wrote in message
...
http://tinyurl.com/nwda4k


Stupid article and inaccurate. There were certainly other attacks during
Bush's presidency... e.g., the anthrax attacks, not to mention his
bungling
the Katrina response, which if it had been an actual attack would have
been
a worse one than 9/11, and not to mention that he was warned about bin
laden
but went on vacation instead of doing something. Of course, that didn't
stop
him from going on vacation for approximately three of his eight years in
office.

His administration was mostly composed of chicken hawks, including
Cheney.
Bush ignored Afganistan since 9/11, instead focusing on a war of choice
rather than necessity. Thus, we have the mess that McChrystal is
struggling
with now. God forbid Obama should actually try and figure out a strategy
that has a reasonable chance of stablizing the situation.

There is an old saying having to do with a Christmas Goose. Much of
the verbiage above would put you in that category.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary
thinking.


So, you have no rational response... got it.

Your posts have degenerated to the same level as Harry's - tripe.

Bye.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.


Have a great life. Didn't you just say you plonked me? Whatever....


--
Nom=de=Plume

President Pantywaist
 

Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:55:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:21:11 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Stupid article and inaccurate. There were certainly other attacks
during
Bush's presidency... e.g., the anthrax attacks,
In all fairness you have to admit the anthrax was home grown, a
disgruntled Ft Dietrick employee. That is like blaming Clinton for
Oklahoma city.

We didn't know that at the time and even if it was, he certainly didn't
protect us by his extensive vacation schedule.
More Christmas Goose material.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary
thinking.

You're denying he spent 3 years of his 8 on vacation? It's pretty well
documented.

You're putting words in his mouth. Perhaps he should put something of his
in your mouth.


Ah ha! Flatulent Jims true self escaping.



FYI: Prefacing a post with "Ah ha!" is moronic and severely detracts
from it's content, dummy.

President Pantywaist
 

Don White wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:36:30 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Sep 30, 12:31 pm, JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:55:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume"





wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:21:11 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:
Stupid article and inaccurate. There were certainly other attacks
during
Bush's presidency... e.g., the anthrax attacks,
In all fairness you have to admit the anthrax was home grown, a
disgruntled Ft Dietrick employee. That is like blaming Clinton for
Oklahoma city.
We didn't know that at the time and even if it was, he certainly didn't
protect us by his extensive vacation schedule.
More Christmas Goose material.
--
John H
John, it's shown itself to be nothing more than a liberal sock puppet,
spouting lies straight out of the lemming playbook. Best to plonk the
boatless shill.
GMTA!

Already done.
--
John H


My my. Johnny must think he's back in the army.
When things get tough...fold & run.



That's exactly what you, and your buddies, do, dummy. Stop plagiarizing me.