On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:11:55 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Sep 28, 11:01*am, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:51:54 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Sep 28, 6:31 am, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:12:00 -0700, Wilson Woods
wrote:

In 1964, when Republicans objected to the Civil Rights Act because it
would lead to quotas, Hubert Humphrey notoriously said he would "start
eating the pages one after another, because [language mandating quotas]
is not in there." Of course, it didn't matter that the language wasn't
in there - the act *DID* lead to quotas.

Btw...in 64...and in 68...it was the Democrats who nearly blocked
passage of ALL of the civil rights acts.

southern democrats. now known as republicans. and it was LBJ who
signed the act. right wingers kinda forgot he was a democrat

Democrats hated him.

ROFLMAO!! EXACTLY my point. he was hated because he knew racism was
evil...of course the GOP took over the racist viewpoint in the south
and won the south from the democrats by pandering to racists.

Chuckle..your buffoonery knows no bounds does it? You evidently are
trying to hide from the fact that Northern Democrats were against the
Civil Rights Acts too. Right Along with Algors and Clintons folks.

And its evident even today..that the DNC party leadership considers
blacks to be.....tools and impliments.


Dont forget..the KKK was exclusivly Democrat

and became republican after LBJ signed the VRA

Some did, MOST remained Democrats. *However the Klan for its 140+ yr
history cannot ignore the fact its been a Democrat organization for 120+
of those years

and for the last 50 years the racists have been republicans.

ROFLMAO! The biggest bunch of white racists continues to be Democrats.

And you are desperately trying to hide from that Fact.


However your ignorance and denial is noted with GREAT amusment

says the guy who thinks this is 1963

Says the guy who belongs to the Racists Party, even today..a ****ing
black lynching Democrat.


Gunner



"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.

This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost