On Sep 28, 6:31*am, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:12:00 -0700, Wilson Woods
wrote:

In 1964, when Republicans objected to the Civil Rights Act because it
would lead to quotas, Hubert Humphrey notoriously said he would "start
eating the pages one after another, because [language mandating quotas]
is not in there." *Of course, it didn't matter that the language wasn't
in there - the act *DID* lead to quotas.

Btw...in 64...and in 68...it was the Democrats who nearly blocked
passage of ALL of the civil rights acts.

southern democrats. now known as republicans. and it was LBJ who
signed the act. right wingers kinda forgot he was a democrat


Dont forget..the KKK was exclusivly Democrat

and became republican after LBJ signed the VRA


"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.

to a right winger, 'fact' is the only offensive 4 letter word

On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:51:54 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Sep 28, 6:31*am, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:12:00 -0700, Wilson Woods
wrote:

In 1964, when Republicans objected to the Civil Rights Act because it
would lead to quotas, Hubert Humphrey notoriously said he would "start
eating the pages one after another, because [language mandating quotas]
is not in there." *Of course, it didn't matter that the language wasn't
in there - the act *DID* lead to quotas.

Btw...in 64...and in 68...it was the Democrats who nearly blocked
passage of ALL of the civil rights acts.

southern democrats. now known as republicans. and it was LBJ who
signed the act. right wingers kinda forgot he was a democrat

Democrats hated him.

Need the cites?


Dont forget..the KKK was exclusivly Democrat

and became republican after LBJ signed the VRA

Some did, MOST remained Democrats. However the Klan for its 140+ yr
history cannot ignore the fact its been a Democrat organization for 120+
of those years

However your ignorance and denial is noted with GREAT amusment



"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.

This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost

On Sep 28, 11:01*am, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:51:54 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Sep 28, 6:31 am, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:12:00 -0700, Wilson Woods
wrote:

In 1964, when Republicans objected to the Civil Rights Act because it
would lead to quotas, Hubert Humphrey notoriously said he would "start
eating the pages one after another, because [language mandating quotas]
is not in there." Of course, it didn't matter that the language wasn't
in there - the act *DID* lead to quotas.

Btw...in 64...and in 68...it was the Democrats who nearly blocked
passage of ALL of the civil rights acts.

southern democrats. now known as republicans. and it was LBJ who
signed the act. right wingers kinda forgot he was a democrat

Democrats hated him.

ROFLMAO!! EXACTLY my point. he was hated because he knew racism was
evil...of course the GOP took over the racist viewpoint in the south
and won the south from the democrats by pandering to racists.


Dont forget..the KKK was exclusivly Democrat

and became republican after LBJ signed the VRA

Some did, MOST remained Democrats. *However the Klan for its 140+ yr
history cannot ignore the fact its been a Democrat organization for 120+
of those years

and for the last 50 years the racists have been republicans.


However your ignorance and denial is noted with GREAT amusment

says the guy who thinks this is 1963

On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:11:55 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Sep 28, 11:01*am, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:51:54 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Sep 28, 6:31 am, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:12:00 -0700, Wilson Woods
wrote:

In 1964, when Republicans objected to the Civil Rights Act because it
would lead to quotas, Hubert Humphrey notoriously said he would "start
eating the pages one after another, because [language mandating quotas]
is not in there." Of course, it didn't matter that the language wasn't
in there - the act *DID* lead to quotas.

Btw...in 64...and in 68...it was the Democrats who nearly blocked
passage of ALL of the civil rights acts.

southern democrats. now known as republicans. and it was LBJ who
signed the act. right wingers kinda forgot he was a democrat

Democrats hated him.

ROFLMAO!! EXACTLY my point. he was hated because he knew racism was
evil...of course the GOP took over the racist viewpoint in the south
and won the south from the democrats by pandering to racists.

Chuckle..your buffoonery knows no bounds does it? You evidently are
trying to hide from the fact that Northern Democrats were against the
Civil Rights Acts too. Right Along with Algors and Clintons folks.

And its evident even today..that the DNC party leadership considers
blacks to be.....tools and impliments.


Dont forget..the KKK was exclusivly Democrat

and became republican after LBJ signed the VRA

Some did, MOST remained Democrats. *However the Klan for its 140+ yr
history cannot ignore the fact its been a Democrat organization for 120+
of those years

and for the last 50 years the racists have been republicans.

ROFLMAO! The biggest bunch of white racists continues to be Democrats.

And you are desperately trying to hide from that Fact.


However your ignorance and denial is noted with GREAT amusment

says the guy who thinks this is 1963

Says the guy who belongs to the Racists Party, even today..a ****ing
black lynching Democrat.


Gunner



"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.

This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost

On Sep 28, 2:25*pm, "Lu Powell" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message



says the guy who forgot that the GOP labeled MLK a communist...



Where did the Dixiecrats come from? You are just like Harry, a penis
envying, capitalist hating, bigoted propaganda tool of the loony left...and
those are your better qualities.

and where did strom thurmond, and the rest of the racist republicans
come from who swept the democrats from power under the guise of
'states rights'? seems you guys can't handle the fact the GOP took
racism as an election winner.


You and your ilk give humanity a bad name.

at least i'm human. the same can't be said about you.

Don't bother to reply. Your cross-posting is a nuisance, and you're back in
my kill file.

that's OK with me. you right wingers can't deal with reality anyhow

On 9/28/09 11:19 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:

As for there no race as Arab....G your ignorance is marvelous to
behold. Most folks call it arab..though middle eastern is more
accurate. And he is Indeed 44% Middle Eastern and only 6% black. Yet
you far leftwingers use his 6% (probably all you could stand to deal
with) as his calling card and his qualification.

Laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh!

Gunner

There is no "Arab race," dirtbag, nor is there a "Middle Eastern race."

"44% Middle Eastern..." What the hell does that mean, s.f.b.?



--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

On Sep 28, 11:19*pm, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:31:34 -0400, H the K
wrote:


I *love* the "six per cent Arab" nonsense, since there's no such race as
"Arab."

You know, of course, that if Obama were not Obama, and he walked through
the "white section" of your typical white cracker town in south Georgia,
South Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi or Texas, assholes like jack or
herring or several others here would say behind his back, "Who is that
N*****?" He's black enough to be black to a white racist. That's what a
certain U.S. Representative from South Carolina thinks he is.

Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

Oh..like Democrat Leader Robert Byrd...former Grand Kleagle of the Klu
Klux Klan? *

byrd's 92. he's the past of the democrats

david duke is much younger. he's the future of the GOP.

On 9/29/09 7:20 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 28, 11:19 pm, Gunner wrote:
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:31:34 -0400, H the
wrote:


I *love* the "six per cent Arab" nonsense, since there's no such race as
"Arab."

You know, of course, that if Obama were not Obama, and he walked through
the "white section" of your typical white cracker town in south Georgia,
South Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi or Texas, assholes like jack or
herring or several others here would say behind his back, "Who is that
N*****?" He's black enough to be black to a white racist. That's what a
certain U.S. Representative from South Carolina thinks he is.

Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

Oh..like Democrat Leader Robert Byrd...former Grand Kleagle of the Klu
Klux Klan?

byrd's 92. he's the past of the democrats

david duke is much younger. he's the future of the GOP.


Never mind Byrd...he's on the way out, and he reformed himself on race,
for the most part. And you don't need to look to Duke...there are enough
racist elected Republican officials around to make do...like that
charmer from South Carolina, Wilson.

What's really laughable is Gunner the Idiot's apparent belief in
"percentages," and the existence of the "Arab race," which he then tried
to backpedal out of by citing more nonsense about a Mediterranean race.
Let's see...living around the Med...whites, blacks, various mixtures,
and all sorts of religions. Someone in Gunner we have a reincarnated
"master racer" from Germany in the 1930's and 1940's...maybe your David
Duke analogy *is* apt. Is Gunner the son of George Lincoln Rockwell? :)




--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

"Gunner Asch" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:31:34 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 9/28/09 4:22 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 28, 3:57 pm, Gunner wrote:


all of the crap and the good stuff snipped....

Harry and wf3h are in my kill file again, so I don't see their pathetic
party line posts. I do see your replies, and love them. They are of the
party of racists, manipulators, and bleeding hearts who take your money to
buy them votes. Go get 'em!

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:16:36 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 9/28/09 11:19 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:

As for there no race as Arab....G your ignorance is marvelous to
behold. Most folks call it arab..though middle eastern is more
accurate. And he is Indeed 44% Middle Eastern and only 6% black. Yet
you far leftwingers use his 6% (probably all you could stand to deal
with) as his calling card and his qualification.

Laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh!

Gunner

There is no "Arab race," dirtbag, nor is there a "Middle Eastern race."

"44% Middle Eastern..." What the hell does that mean, s.f.b.?

Really? Odd..even the ragheads disagree with your buffoonery

http://www.ou.edu/mideast/category/ethnicity.htm
http://www.fotosearch.com/photos-ima...ethnicity.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_...he_Middle_East

So did you actually graduate from high school, or did they toss you out
for your drug use and isnt it about time you got cleaned up for your
shift at McDonalds?

Shrug..your buffoonery is noted with amusement

Gunner


Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional,
illogical liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an
unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the
proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.