"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:15:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:37:59 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
m...
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:28:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
news:93j4c5p440k5u4ga96e04drdugde9qqlv8@4ax. com...
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:41:17 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
news:sle4c51k5hpiifpj67dn4u49aj252flhsh@4a x.com...
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:14:42 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
news3u3c559m52drsr6h9nfemr1qr842cm68v@ 4ax.com...
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:52:53 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
news:eba2c55a2f42477ib1mgmkvc36ki6i4ho ...
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:53:18 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JustWait" wrote in message
...
Woooo.... Clinton got a blow job. Call CNN.

Whooo, somebody uttered liar under his breath, call the CI
****ing
A...


I don't get it.

Think 'bama and Wilson. The latter was being truthful. The
former
was
not.
--

John H


You're talking about the jerk who yelled in the joint session?
He's
a
known
liar on several levels and he supported keeping the Confederate
flag
flying.

Robert Byrd did the same kind of stuff, and he supported
hangings.
--

John H


So, that makes Wilson's behavior ok? Sounds like some kind of
rationale?

What does Wilson's 'support' of flying the Confederate flag have
to
do
with his telling the truth? Talk about rationale.

The big question is whether or not you 'get it' yet? If not,
sorry.
If
so, then nothing further is necessary.
--

John H


Firstly, he didn't "tell the truth." Secondly, it shows him to be
what
he
is... a racist.

Oh, only a racist calls another person a liar when they lie.

Damn, learn something new daily.
--

John H


No, but this guy Wilson clearly has a problem with blacks.

He has a problem with liars. Just because they may be black doesn't
make him a racist for pointing out the fact.
--

John H


Maybe because he is a liar. He lied about being an immigration lawyer,
for
example:

"We need to be discussing issues specifically to help the American
people.
And that would not include illegal aliens, these are people-- I'm for
immigration, legal immigration, I've been an immigration attorney."

Whether he was or was not an immigration attorney has no bearing on
his identification of a liar.


So, what you're saying is that known liars (Wilson) should be listened to
with the same credibility as the president of the United States? I don't
think so.

There was another liberal here famous for putting words in the mouths
of others.

I said, "Think 'bama and Wilson. The latter was being truthful. The
former was not."

That's not so hard, is it?
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.


And I said, show me some credible evidence that Obama has lied about the
proposed legislation. So far, you haven't said anything, except that even if
Wilson is a proven liar and racist, that "doesn't matter."


--
Nom=de=Plume