On Sep 26, 1:41*pm, TopBassDog wrote:
On Sep 26, 9:41*am, wf3h wrote:





On Sep 25, 4:13*am, TopBassDog wrote:

On Sep 24, 10:14*pm, wf3h wrote:

if i were stupid i'd be right wing.

sorry. aint gonna happen. as mencken said, 'not all conservatives are
stupid people, but most stupid people are conservative'.

But lets go for another quote, shall we?

"The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the most
daring liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to
tell them the truth."

Let go for another, shall we?

yeah. how about this:

'people will love you if they think you're making them think. they'll
hate you if you make them think'

no wonder the right doesn't quote him much

In the blanked statement you quoted, *there was nothing mentioned
about the right nor the left. So, evidently you are addressing the
point that the liberals are stupid

seems like you haven't read much mencken

On Sep 26, 12:50*pm, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 26, 1:41*pm, TopBassDog wrote:



On Sep 26, 9:41*am, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 25, 4:13*am, TopBassDog wrote:

On Sep 24, 10:14*pm, wf3h wrote:

if i were stupid i'd be right wing.

sorry. aint gonna happen. as mencken said, 'not all conservatives are
stupid people, but most stupid people are conservative'.

But lets go for another quote, shall we?

"The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the most
daring liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to
tell them the truth."

Let go for another, shall we?

yeah. how about this:

'people will love you if they think you're making them think. they'll
hate you if you make them think'

no wonder the right doesn't quote him much

In the blanked statement you quoted, *there was nothing mentioned
about the right nor the left. So, evidently you are addressing the
point that the liberals are stupid

seems like you haven't read much mencken

seems you read only what fits your agenda

On Sep 26, 3:03*pm, TopBassDog wrote:
On Sep 26, 12:50*pm, wf3h wrote:




In the blanked statement you quoted, *there was nothing mentioned
about the right nor the left. So, evidently you are addressing the
point that the liberals are stupid

seems like you haven't read much mencken

seems you read only what fits your agenda-

which is quite a statement from someone who can't read at all

On Sep 26, 2:16*pm, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 26, 3:03*pm, TopBassDog wrote:

On Sep 26, 12:50*pm, wf3h wrote:

In the blanked statement you quoted, *there was nothing mentioned
about the right nor the left. So, evidently you are addressing the
point that the liberals are stupid

seems like you haven't read much mencken

seems you read only what fits your agenda-

which is quite a statement from someone who can't read at all

That was such a statement of brilliance!

If I can not read; I cannot type.

If I can not type; you can not read what I type.

If you cannot read what I type; you can not reply to what you have
read that I have typed.

You have replied to what I have typed, so who is it that cannot read?

On Sep 26, 3:41*pm, TopBassDog wrote:
On Sep 26, 2:16*pm, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 26, 3:03*pm, TopBassDog wrote:

On Sep 26, 12:50*pm, wf3h wrote:

In the blanked statement you quoted, *there was nothing mentioned
about the right nor the left. So, evidently you are addressing the
point that the liberals are stupid

seems like you haven't read much mencken

seems you read only what fits your agenda-

which is quite a statement from someone who can't read at all

That was such a statement of brilliance!

If I can not read; I cannot type.

well, no. you have your 5 year old kid do it for you. he undoubtedly
is more capable than you.

On Sep 26, 2:59*pm, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 26, 3:41*pm, TopBassDog wrote:



On Sep 26, 2:16*pm, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 26, 3:03*pm, TopBassDog wrote:

On Sep 26, 12:50*pm, wf3h wrote:

In the blanked statement you quoted, *there was nothing mentioned
about the right nor the left. So, evidently you are addressing the
point that the liberals are stupid

seems like you haven't read much mencken

seems you read only what fits your agenda-

which is quite a statement from someone who can't read at all

That was such a statement of brilliance!

If I can not read; I cannot type.

well, no. you have your 5 year old kid do it for you. he undoubtedly
is more capable than you.

Really? You know me? I have a "5 year old kid?

I suppose you earned your ham radio license via correspondence, or did
you pay off a bureaucrat in the FCC?

On Sep 26, 4:23*pm, TopBassDog wrote:
On Sep 26, 2:59*pm, wf3h wrote:





On Sep 26, 3:41*pm, TopBassDog wrote:

On Sep 26, 2:16*pm, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 26, 3:03*pm, TopBassDog wrote:

On Sep 26, 12:50*pm, wf3h wrote:

In the blanked statement you quoted, *there was nothing mentioned
about the right nor the left. So, evidently you are addressing the
point that the liberals are stupid

seems like you haven't read much mencken

seems you read only what fits your agenda-

which is quite a statement from someone who can't read at all

That was such a statement of brilliance!

If I can not read; I cannot type.

well, no. you have your 5 year old kid do it for you. he undoubtedly
is more capable than you.

Really? You know me? I have a "5 year old kid?

my mistake. perhaps you have a computer that can read text. it'd
certainly be more intelligent than you are. and, i suppose, if you
DID have a kid, you'd never admit it. paternity suits are expensive