On Sep 24, 3:10*pm, wf3h wrote:


i know you righties love big govt with unlmited powers, but we lovers
of the constitution prefer a separation of powers...

like obama prefers, instead of bush with his imperial presidency and
unlimited powers.

You mean like firing the CEO of a private company, appointing
unconstitutional "czars" for all kinds of crap, attempting to silence
critics by sending thugs to beat then up, asking citizens to rat out
people with different viewpoints... yeah, right.
------------------------------------------------------------
Senior Democrat Says Obama’s Czars Unconstitutional

June 15, 2009Last week President Obama appointed yet another “czar”
with massive government power, answering only to him. Even before this
latest appointment, the top-ranking Democrat in the Senate wrote
President Obama a letter saying that these czars are unconstitutional.
President Obama’s “czar strategy” is an unprecedented power grab
centralizing authority in the White House, outside congressional
oversight and in violation of the Constitution.

As of last week, Czar Kenneth Feinberg has the authority to set the
pay scale for executives at any company receiving government money
(and how many aren’t, these days?). Czar Feinberg has the power to say
that someone’s pay is excessive, and to make companies cut that pay
until the czar is pleased.

Congress did not give Czar Feinberg this authority. For that matter,
Congress has not authorized any of the czars that President Barack
Obama has created. Over the past thirty years presidents have each had
one or two czars for various issues, and once the number went as high
as five. But now, by some counts President Obama has created sixteen
czars, and there may be more on the way. Each of these has enormous
government power, and answers only to the president.
--------------------------------------------------------
"big govt with unlimited powers"... indeed. You're such an idiot you
can't see what going on right in front of you.