On Sep 24, 3:10*pm, wf3h wrote:


i know you righties love big govt with unlmited powers, but we lovers
of the constitution prefer a separation of powers...

like obama prefers, instead of bush with his imperial presidency and
unlimited powers.

You mean like firing the CEO of a private company, appointing
unconstitutional "czars" for all kinds of crap, attempting to silence
critics by sending thugs to beat then up, asking citizens to rat out
people with different viewpoints... yeah, right.
------------------------------------------------------------
Senior Democrat Says Obama’s Czars Unconstitutional

June 15, 2009Last week President Obama appointed yet another “czar”
with massive government power, answering only to him. Even before this
latest appointment, the top-ranking Democrat in the Senate wrote
President Obama a letter saying that these czars are unconstitutional.
President Obama’s “czar strategy” is an unprecedented power grab
centralizing authority in the White House, outside congressional
oversight and in violation of the Constitution.

As of last week, Czar Kenneth Feinberg has the authority to set the
pay scale for executives at any company receiving government money
(and how many aren’t, these days?). Czar Feinberg has the power to say
that someone’s pay is excessive, and to make companies cut that pay
until the czar is pleased.

Congress did not give Czar Feinberg this authority. For that matter,
Congress has not authorized any of the czars that President Barack
Obama has created. Over the past thirty years presidents have each had
one or two czars for various issues, and once the number went as high
as five. But now, by some counts President Obama has created sixteen
czars, and there may be more on the way. Each of these has enormous
government power, and answers only to the president.
--------------------------------------------------------
"big govt with unlimited powers"... indeed. You're such an idiot you
can't see what going on right in front of you.

On Sep 24, 4:31*pm, Jack wrote:
On Sep 24, 3:10*pm, wf3h wrote:



i know you righties love big govt with unlmited powers, but we lovers
of the constitution prefer a separation of powers...

like obama prefers, instead of bush with his imperial presidency and
unlimited powers.

You mean like firing the CEO of a private company,

i guess you, like a typical right winger, think we should have just
given the rich $25B and said 'it's paid for by the taxpayers. screw
'em'


appointing
unconstitutional "czars" for all kinds of crap,

meaningless. has nothing to do with habeas corpus

*attempting to silence
critics by sending thugs to beat then up, asking citizens to rat out
people with different *viewpoints... yeah, right.


more racist ****** hatred from the far right. obama has zip to do
with this, but the far right, with their hatred of the commie kenyan
****** arab muslim president, make up lies.


------------------------------------------------------------
Senior Democrat Says Obama’s Czars Unconstitutional

June 15, 2009Last week President Obama appointed yet another “czar”
with massive government power, answering only to him. Even before this
latest appointment, the top-ranking Democrat in the Senate wrote
President Obama a letter saying that these czars are unconstitutional.
President Obama’s “czar strategy” is an unprecedented power grab
centralizing authority in the White House, outside congressional
oversight and in violation of the Constitution.

As of last week, Czar Kenneth Feinberg has the authority to set the
pay scale for executives at any company receiving government money

ah. receiving govt money

funny how you right wingers think the president should have unlimited
powers to arrest and detain, but you shudder with horror over the govt
trying to protect the money it's lent private companies

shows how ****ed up the right really is.

..
--------------------------------------------------------
"big govt with unlimited powers"... indeed. *You're such an idiot you
can't see what going on right in front of you.

says the guy who thinks only rich right wing presidents should have
unlimited powers

On Sep 24, 7:25*pm, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 24, 4:31*pm, Jack wrote:
Senior Democrat Says Obama’s Czars Unconstitutional

June 15, 2009Last week President Obama appointed yet another “czar”
with massive government power, answering only to him. Even before this
latest appointment, the top-ranking Democrat in the Senate wrote
President Obama a letter saying that these czars are unconstitutional.
President Obama’s “czar strategy” is an unprecedented power grab
centralizing authority in the White House, outside congressional
oversight and in violation of the Constitution.

Congress did not give Czar Feinberg this authority. For that matter,
Congress has not authorized any of the czars that President Barack
Obama has created. Over the past thirty years presidents have each
had
one or two czars for various issues, and once the number went as high
as five. But now, by some counts President Obama has created sixteen
czars, and there may be more on the way. Each of these has enormous
government power, and answers only to the president.
--------------------------------------------------------
"big govt with unlimited powers"... indeed. *You're such an idiot you
can't see what going on right in front of you.

says the guy who thinks only rich right wing presidents should have
unlimited powers

Never said that, but you're the guy that backs a president that not
only goes back on his promise to rescind the previous administration's
powers, but then make an unprecedented power grab of his own that his
own party admonishes him for. All the while you blindly march along,
eh comrade?

You either just love to argue, or you're exceptionally stupid. Who am
I kidding, it's both. I'm done.

On 9/24/09 8:48 PM, Jack wrote:
On Sep 24, 7:25 pm, wrote:
On Sep 24, 4:31 pm, wrote:
Senior Democrat Says Obama’s Czars Unconstitutional

June 15, 2009Last week President Obama appointed yet another “czar”
with massive government power, answering only to him. Even before this
latest appointment, the top-ranking Democrat in the Senate wrote
President Obama a letter saying that these czars are unconstitutional.
President Obama’s “czar strategy” is an unprecedented power grab
centralizing authority in the White House, outside congressional
oversight and in violation of the Constitution.

Congress did not give Czar Feinberg this authority. For that matter,
Congress has not authorized any of the czars that President Barack
Obama has created. Over the past thirty years presidents have each
had
one or two czars for various issues, and once the number went as high
as five. But now, by some counts President Obama has created sixteen
czars, and there may be more on the way. Each of these has enormous
government power, and answers only to the president.
--------------------------------------------------------
"big govt with unlimited powers"... indeed. You're such an idiot you
can't see what going on right in front of you.

says the guy who thinks only rich right wing presidents should have
unlimited powers

Never said that, but you're the guy that backs a president that not
only goes back on his promise to rescind the previous administration's
powers, but then make an unprecedented power grab of his own that his
own party admonishes him for. All the while you blindly march along,
eh comrade?

You either just love to argue, or you're exceptionally stupid. Who am
I kidding, it's both. I'm done.



Won't it be great when "the scoops" stop by jackoff's house and take him
away to the soylent green processing plant?

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

"H the K" wrote in message
news
On 9/24/09 8:48 PM, Jack wrote:
On Sep 24, 7:25 pm, wrote:
On Sep 24, 4:31 pm, wrote:
Senior Democrat Says Obama’s Czars Unconstitutional

June 15, 2009Last week President Obama appointed yet another “czar”
with massive government power, answering only to him. Even before this
latest appointment, the top-ranking Democrat in the Senate wrote
President Obama a letter saying that these czars are unconstitutional.
President Obama’s “czar strategy” is an unprecedented power grab
centralizing authority in the White House, outside congressional
oversight and in violation of the Constitution.

Congress did not give Czar Feinberg this authority. For that matter,
Congress has not authorized any of the czars that President Barack
Obama has created. Over the past thirty years presidents have each
had
one or two czars for various issues, and once the number went as high
as five. But now, by some counts President Obama has created sixteen
czars, and there may be more on the way. Each of these has enormous
government power, and answers only to the president.
--------------------------------------------------------
"big govt with unlimited powers"... indeed. You're such an idiot you
can't see what going on right in front of you.

says the guy who thinks only rich right wing presidents should have
unlimited powers

Never said that, but you're the guy that backs a president that not
only goes back on his promise to rescind the previous administration's
powers, but then make an unprecedented power grab of his own that his
own party admonishes him for. All the while you blindly march along,
eh comrade?

You either just love to argue, or you're exceptionally stupid. Who am
I kidding, it's both. I'm done.



Won't it be great when "the scoops" stop by jackoff's house and take him
away to the soylent green processing plant?

--

I don't think he'd get past the quality test........ maybe he could
fertilize weeds somewhere.

On Sep 24, 8:48*pm, Jack wrote:
On Sep 24, 7:25*pm, wf3h wrote: On Sep 24, 4:31*pm, Jack wrote:

Congress did not give Czar Feinberg this authority. For that matter,

Congress has not authorized any of the czars that President Barack
Obama has created. Over the past thirty years presidents have each
had
one or two czars for various issues, and once the number went as high
as five. But now, by some counts President Obama has created sixteen
czars, and there may be more on the way. Each of these has enormous
government power, and answers only to the president.

irrelevant. you can't be slightly pregnant and you cant be slightly
unconstitutional. it's either constitutional or not.


--------------------------------------------------------

"big govt with unlimited powers"... indeed. *You're such an idiot you
can't see what going on right in front of you.

says the guy who thinks only rich right wing presidents should have
unlimited powers

Never said that, but you're the guy that backs a president that not
only goes back on his promise to rescind the previous administration's
powers

meaningless

, but then make an unprecedented power grab of his own that his
own party admonishes him for. *All the while you blindly march along,
eh comrade?

well no. so a senator admonishes the president. who cares?

You either just love to argue, or you're exceptionally stupid. *Who am
I kidding, it's both. *I'm done.

if i were stupid i'd be right wing.

sorry. aint gonna happen. as mencken said, 'not all conservatives are
stupid people, but most stupid people are conservative'.

you're living proof

On Sep 24, 11:14*pm, wf3h wrote:


sorry. aint gonna happen. as mencken said, 'not all conservatives are
stupid people, but most stupid people are conservative'.


You're quoting that bigot? Case closed, you're a freakin' loon.

No more wasting my time with you.

On Sep 24, 11:40*pm, Jack wrote:
On Sep 24, 11:14*pm, wf3h wrote:



sorry. aint gonna happen. as mencken said, 'not all conservatives are
stupid people, but most stupid people are conservative'.

You're quoting that bigot? *Case closed, you're a freakin' loon.

No more wasting my time with you.

says the guy who believes strom thurmond was the 2nd coming

On Sep 24, 10:14*pm, wf3h wrote:


if i were stupid i'd be right wing.

sorry. aint gonna happen. as mencken said, 'not all conservatives are
stupid people, but most stupid people are conservative'.

you're living proof


Quoting H.L Menken? HL Menken?

Then here is a quote of his that you should remember.

"The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As democracy
is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner
soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and
glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright
moron."

"The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As democracy
is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner
soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and
glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright
moron." (Baltimore Evening Sun, July 26, 1920)..."

Excellent! ....this is what we get when Americans don't pay attention
to politics until election day.

But lets go for another quote, shall we?

"The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the most
daring liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to
tell them the truth."

Let go for another, shall we?

On Sep 25, 4:13*am, TopBassDog wrote:
On Sep 24, 10:14*pm, wf3h wrote:



if i were stupid i'd be right wing.

sorry. aint gonna happen. as mencken said, 'not all conservatives are
stupid people, but most stupid people are conservative'.

you're living proof

Quoting H.L Menken? *HL Menken?

Then here is a quote of his that you should remember.

"The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As democracy
is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner
soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and
glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright
moron."

"The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As democracy
is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner
soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and
glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright
moron." (Baltimore Evening Sun, July 26, 1920)..."

Excellent! ....this is what we get when *Americans don't pay attention
to politics until election day.

But lets go for another quote, shall we?

"The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the most
daring liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to
tell them the truth."

Let go for another, shall we?

Heh, heh... crickets from the wf3 idiot.