On Sep 24, 3:02*pm, Jack wrote:
On Sep 24, 2:30*pm, wf3h wrote:



I am correct. *Obama did not support it when Bush did it, and promised
to change the policy, but now he has flopped and adopted Bush's
policy. *He lied to you.

so you never did learn to read. bush said he didn't need congress's
approval. obama said he does

"concluding that it does not need specific permission from Congress"
BO says he *doesn't* need it. *Got it?

uh...no.

he doesn't need SPECIFIC approval for detaining people

BECAUSE HE ALREADY HAS IT

WITHOUT it, he'd NEED TO GO AND GET IT

bush, OTOH, said he didn't need it

hope that clears it up for you.


and he already *has it

Because he's keeping something Bush got originally,

ROFLMAO!! bush said he didn't need it. that's what the article said

m'kay?

got it?

sheesh! a black hole emits more info than you do

you lefties howled
about it then, BO promised to get rid of it, but is now embracing it.
Obama lied, you spin, and the world turns.

You're so easy.

i know you righties love big govt with unlmited powers, but we lovers
of the constitution prefer a separation of powers...

like obama prefers, instead of bush with his imperial presidency and
unlimited powers.