On Sep 24, 1:23*pm, Jack wrote:
On Sep 24, 12:55*pm, wf3h wrote:





On Sep 24, 11:11*am, Jack wrote:

On Sep 24, 10:17*am, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 24, 10:06*am, Jack wrote:

On Sep 24, 9:14*am, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 24, 9:07*am, Jack wrote:

On Sep 24, 8:57*am, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 24, 8:43*am, Toots Sweet wrote:

How about it Pinheads - like this?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/24/us...n.html?_r=1&hp

Another campaign promise thrown under the bus. You Lefties must be
getting mighty tired of all this whiffing on your important issues by
Dear Leader.

well...no. the right wing liar (a redundancy) forgets to tell us that
obama said he'd obey CONGRESSIONAL mandates...which is what this was

bush said he didn't need congressional oversight to detain people.
obama says he does.

so the right wing liar strikes again.

"In concluding that it does not need specific permission from Congress
to hold detainees without charges, the Obama administration is
adopting one of the arguments advanced by the Bush administration in
years of debates about detention policies."

Idiot.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

guess the moron didn't read the article:

"Instead, the administration will continue to hold the detainees
without bringing them to trial based on the power it says it has under
the Congressional resolution passed after the attacks of Sept. 11,
2001, authorizing the president to use force against forces of Al
Qaeda and the Taliban.

You're confused. *Here's what your boy promised:

""He will reject the Military Commissions Act, which allowed the U.S.
to circumvent Geneva Conventions in the handling of detainees."

which, of course, has nothing at all to do with the article, or what
bush said, or what the right wing said obama said

this is called 'goalpost moving'. he got his ass shredded in this
argument so now abandons it and tries something else

typical right wing idiot.

You evidently never even understood the original post. *Let me refresh
you:

"Another campaign promise thrown under the bus. You Lefties must be
getting mighty tired of all this whiffing on your important issues by
Dear Leader."

Don't you ever get tired of being wrong? *Now put down the Sterno,
back away, and sober up.-

IOW you righties said obama supported bush's policy

the article said exactly the opposite

"In concluding that it does not need specific permission from
Congress
to hold detainees without charges, the Obama administration is
adopting one of the arguments advanced by the Bush administration in
years of debates about detention policies."

"the Obama administration is adopting one of the arguments advanced by
the Bush administration "

so under right wing logic that makes you correct.

I am correct. *Obama did not support it when Bush did it, and promised
to change the policy, but now he has flopped and adopted Bush's
policy. *He lied to you.

so you never did learn to read. bush said he didn't need congress's
approval. obama said he does and he already has it

that's what the article said. sorry you can't read


Your left wing logic has failed you. *But you are a good apologist for
BO... a lemming to the end.-

says the right wing limbaugh sock puppet