On Sep 26, 12:53*am, Zombywoof wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:41:38 -0500, thunder
wrote:



Maybe it's different here, than there, but here, it mostly takes 2
incomes to provide all that. *30-40 years ago, it wasn't that common for
wives to work. *Now, it is uncommon if they don't. *That has to account
for something. *

Yeah it does account for something, like a whole plethora of Social
Problems. *While I won't save "wife", but when both spouses work who's
going to take care of hearth & home keeping those home fires burning
and nurturing the family unit?

ah the family unit, much beloved of the right wing. except they do
everything they can to destroy it.

family leave? they opposed it. it would hurt the profit of the rich

contraception? they oppose it. it reduces the work force

protection against sex discrimination? they oppose it. women shouldn't
be in the workforce

unemployment insurance? they oppose it. the middle class is lazy. ony
the rich work hard.

lots of blather about the 'family unit'. but they draw a BIG bull's
eye on the family.