"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:14:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"thunder" wrote in message
inet...
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:03:57 -0700, nom=de=plume wrote:


I believe that no patriotic American would even entertain such a
notion
of harming a president.

Who said they were patriotic? Death threats against the President are
up
400% over Bush's last year in office, and in Bush's last years, he
wasn't
very popular. Since Carter is always wrong, we know it can't be
racism.
So, it must be the Right has some un-American trash in it's midst.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...t-Service.html


This is called "Bush rationale" apparently.

In reverse...you went off the deep end over a picture of Air Force One
with some black spots on it. Yet, I'll bet there was no outcry from
you over any of the Bush assassination depictions.

Wonder why? Surely not because you're a liberal friend of Harry's!
--

John H


Like I said, you sound like a four year old. I have some experience with
them. You're obviously a lot older than that and sometimes you seem to be
thoughtful, so I can only surmise you're just being mean for no reason
other than some perverse pleasure. Have at it.

--
Nom=de=Plume


That's out Lt Colonel.
Could you imagine serving under him in the army?

On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:36:42 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:14:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"thunder" wrote in message
tinet...
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:03:57 -0700, nom=de=plume wrote:


I believe that no patriotic American would even entertain such a
notion
of harming a president.

Who said they were patriotic? Death threats against the President are
up
400% over Bush's last year in office, and in Bush's last years, he
wasn't
very popular. Since Carter is always wrong, we know it can't be
racism.
So, it must be the Right has some un-American trash in it's midst.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...t-Service.html


This is called "Bush rationale" apparently.

In reverse...you went off the deep end over a picture of Air Force One
with some black spots on it. Yet, I'll bet there was no outcry from
you over any of the Bush assassination depictions.

Wonder why? Surely not because you're a liberal friend of Harry's!
--

John H


Like I said, you sound like a four year old. I have some experience with
them. You're obviously a lot older than that and sometimes you seem to be
thoughtful, so I can only surmise you're just being mean for no reason
other than some perverse pleasure. Have at it.

--
Nom=de=Plume


That's out Lt Colonel.
Could you imagine serving under him in the army?


Actually Donnie, no one served 'under' me in the Army, male or female.
Your comment was quite sexist and unnecessary.

You should apologize to the plum.
--

John H

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:36:42 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:14:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"thunder" wrote in message
news:WsSdnWnEBJE7kyXXnZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@posted. gtinet...
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:03:57 -0700, nom=de=plume wrote:


I believe that no patriotic American would even entertain such a
notion
of harming a president.

Who said they were patriotic? Death threats against the President
are
up
400% over Bush's last year in office, and in Bush's last years, he
wasn't
very popular. Since Carter is always wrong, we know it can't be
racism.
So, it must be the Right has some un-American trash in it's midst.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...t-Service.html


This is called "Bush rationale" apparently.

In reverse...you went off the deep end over a picture of Air Force One
with some black spots on it. Yet, I'll bet there was no outcry from
you over any of the Bush assassination depictions.

Wonder why? Surely not because you're a liberal friend of Harry's!
--

John H


Like I said, you sound like a four year old. I have some experience with
them. You're obviously a lot older than that and sometimes you seem to
be
thoughtful, so I can only surmise you're just being mean for no reason
other than some perverse pleasure. Have at it.

--
Nom=de=Plume


That's out Lt Colonel.
Could you imagine serving under him in the army?


Actually Donnie, no one served 'under' me in the Army, male or female.
Your comment was quite sexist and unnecessary.

You should apologize to the plum.
--

John H

Were you, or were you not in charge of people of lesser rank?
Don't play games with terminology.

On 9/22/09 6:20 PM, Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:36:42 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:14:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
t...
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:03:57 -0700, nom=de=plume wrote:


I believe that no patriotic American would even entertain such a
notion
of harming a president.

Who said they were patriotic? Death threats against the President
are
up
400% over Bush's last year in office, and in Bush's last years, he
wasn't
very popular. Since Carter is always wrong, we know it can't be
racism.
So, it must be the Right has some un-American trash in it's midst.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...t-Service.html


This is called "Bush rationale" apparently.

In reverse...you went off the deep end over a picture of Air Force One
with some black spots on it. Yet, I'll bet there was no outcry from
you over any of the Bush assassination depictions.

Wonder why? Surely not because you're a liberal friend of Harry's!
--

John H


Like I said, you sound like a four year old. I have some experience with
them. You're obviously a lot older than that and sometimes you seem to
be
thoughtful, so I can only surmise you're just being mean for no reason
other than some perverse pleasure. Have at it.

--
Nom=de=Plume


That's out Lt Colonel.
Could you imagine serving under him in the army?


Actually Donnie, no one served 'under' me in the Army, male or female.
Your comment was quite sexist and unnecessary.

You should apologize to the plum.
--

John H

Were you, or were you not in charge of people of lesser rank?
Don't play games with terminology.




Herring is playing word games...again. He thinks it makes him
look...clever.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

H the K wrote:
On 9/22/09 6:20 PM, Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:36:42 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:14:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
t...
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:03:57 -0700, nom=de=plume wrote:


I believe that no patriotic American would even entertain such a
notion
of harming a president.

Who said they were patriotic? Death threats against the President
are
up
400% over Bush's last year in office, and in Bush's last years, he
wasn't
very popular. Since Carter is always wrong, we know it can't be
racism.
So, it must be the Right has some un-American trash in it's midst.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...t-Service.html



This is called "Bush rationale" apparently.

In reverse...you went off the deep end over a picture of Air Force
One
with some black spots on it. Yet, I'll bet there was no outcry from
you over any of the Bush assassination depictions.

Wonder why? Surely not because you're a liberal friend of Harry's!
--

John H


Like I said, you sound like a four year old. I have some experience
with
them. You're obviously a lot older than that and sometimes you seem to
be
thoughtful, so I can only surmise you're just being mean for no reason
other than some perverse pleasure. Have at it.

--
Nom=de=Plume


That's out Lt Colonel.
Could you imagine serving under him in the army?


Actually Donnie, no one served 'under' me in the Army, male or female.
Your comment was quite sexist and unnecessary.

You should apologize to the plum.
--

John H

Were you, or were you not in charge of people of lesser rank?
Don't play games with terminology.




Herring is playing word games...again. He thinks it makes him
look...clever.


You played the game - and lost.

On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:20:33 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:36:42 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:14:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"thunder" wrote in message
news:WsSdnWnEBJE7kyXXnZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@posted .gtinet...
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:03:57 -0700, nom=de=plume wrote:


I believe that no patriotic American would even entertain such a
notion
of harming a president.

Who said they were patriotic? Death threats against the President
are
up
400% over Bush's last year in office, and in Bush's last years, he
wasn't
very popular. Since Carter is always wrong, we know it can't be
racism.
So, it must be the Right has some un-American trash in it's midst.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...t-Service.html


This is called "Bush rationale" apparently.

In reverse...you went off the deep end over a picture of Air Force One
with some black spots on it. Yet, I'll bet there was no outcry from
you over any of the Bush assassination depictions.

Wonder why? Surely not because you're a liberal friend of Harry's!
--

John H


Like I said, you sound like a four year old. I have some experience with
them. You're obviously a lot older than that and sometimes you seem to
be
thoughtful, so I can only surmise you're just being mean for no reason
other than some perverse pleasure. Have at it.

--
Nom=de=Plume


That's out Lt Colonel.
Could you imagine serving under him in the army?


Actually Donnie, no one served 'under' me in the Army, male or female.
Your comment was quite sexist and unnecessary.

You should apologize to the plum.
--

John H

Were you, or were you not in charge of people of lesser rank?
Don't play games with terminology.


Learn to speak. I said no one served 'under' me.

I realize you're just pretending, but sometimes you should knock off
the pretense and be sensible.
--

John H

Don White wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:36:42 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:14:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:03:57 -0700, nom=de=plume wrote:


I believe that no patriotic American would even entertain such a
notion
of harming a president.
Who said they were patriotic? Death threats against the President
are
up
400% over Bush's last year in office, and in Bush's last years, he
wasn't
very popular. Since Carter is always wrong, we know it can't be
racism.
So, it must be the Right has some un-American trash in it's midst.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...t-Service.html

This is called "Bush rationale" apparently.
In reverse...you went off the deep end over a picture of Air Force One
with some black spots on it. Yet, I'll bet there was no outcry from
you over any of the Bush assassination depictions.

Wonder why? Surely not because you're a liberal friend of Harry's!
--

John H

Like I said, you sound like a four year old. I have some experience with
them. You're obviously a lot older than that and sometimes you seem to
be
thoughtful, so I can only surmise you're just being mean for no reason
other than some perverse pleasure. Have at it.

--
Nom=de=Plume

That's out Lt Colonel.
Could you imagine serving under him in the army?

Actually Donnie, no one served 'under' me in the Army, male or female.
Your comment was quite sexist and unnecessary.

You should apologize to the plum.
--

John H

Were you, or were you not in charge of people of lesser rank?
Don't play games with terminology.



™ is more professional!

Don White wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:36:42 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:14:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:03:57 -0700, nom=de=plume wrote:


I believe that no patriotic American would even entertain such a
notion
of harming a president.
Who said they were patriotic? Death threats against the President
are
up
400% over Bush's last year in office, and in Bush's last years, he
wasn't
very popular. Since Carter is always wrong, we know it can't be
racism.
So, it must be the Right has some un-American trash in it's midst.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...t-Service.html

This is called "Bush rationale" apparently.
In reverse...you went off the deep end over a picture of Air Force One
with some black spots on it. Yet, I'll bet there was no outcry from
you over any of the Bush assassination depictions.

Wonder why? Surely not because you're a liberal friend of Harry's!
--

John H

Like I said, you sound like a four year old. I have some experience with
them. You're obviously a lot older than that and sometimes you seem to
be
thoughtful, so I can only surmise you're just being mean for no reason
other than some perverse pleasure. Have at it.

--
Nom=de=Plume

That's out Lt Colonel.
Could you imagine serving under him in the army?

Actually Donnie, no one served 'under' me in the Army, male or female.
Your comment was quite sexist and unnecessary.

You should apologize to the plum.
--

John H

Were you, or were you not in charge of people of lesser rank?
Don't play games with terminology.



What the hell is the difference, dummy? Do you really need to know?