On Sep 21, 9:49*am, Jack wrote:
On Sep 21, 7:50*am, wf3h wrote:





On Sep 20, 7:54*pm, Jack wrote:

On Sep 20, 6:05*pm, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 20, 6:00*pm, "Canuck57" wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message

.. .

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8827/97690686.jpg

Maybe Texas should suceed before Obama racks up too much debt. *Already a
world record for one idividual to rack up so much debt.

courtesy of the bush project to enrich the already rich by having the
middle class take it in the shorts

Maybe you should have studied and worked harder so you didn't end up
so "middle class".

as i said, the rich hates the middle class.

That's not what you said.

sure you did. i left your words intact above. what do you wish to
retract or deny?

i'm proud to be middle class. you hate *us? i'm proud of that, too.

And that's not what I said, or implied. *Your attempts to spin and
create fact out of fallacy is duly noted. *It is your MO.-

again, what part of 'middle class' don't you understand?

On Sep 21, 11:07*am, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 21, 9:49*am, Jack wrote:





On Sep 21, 7:50*am, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 20, 7:54*pm, Jack wrote:

On Sep 20, 6:05*pm, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 20, 6:00*pm, "Canuck57" wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message

.. .

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8827/97690686.jpg

Maybe Texas should suceed before Obama racks up too much debt. *Already a
world record for one idividual to rack up so much debt.

courtesy of the bush project to enrich the already rich by having the
middle class take it in the shorts

Maybe you should have studied and worked harder so you didn't end up
so "middle class".

as i said, the rich hates the middle class.

That's not what you said.

sure you did. i left your words intact above. what do you wish to
retract or deny?

My comment was about what *you* wrote, not what I wrote. You wrote
"as i said, the rich hates the middle class", but that was not what
you had previously written. Your previous statement was "courtesy of
the bush project to enrich the already rich by having the middle class
take it in the shorts" That says nothing about hate of anyone.


i'm proud to be middle class. you hate *us? i'm proud of that, too.

And that's not what I said, or implied. *Your attempts to spin and
create fact out of fallacy is duly noted. *It is your MO.-

again, what part of 'middle class' don't you understand?

I neither stated, or implied, that I hated anyone. What part of that
do you not understand?

At first I thought your non sequitur responses were deliberate
attempts to obfuscate the issue. I'm starting to believe that your
inability to follow a thread in a logical manner is intrinsic to your
nature.

cya

On Sep 21, 12:27*pm, Jack wrote:
On Sep 21, 11:07*am, wf3h wrote:





On Sep 21, 9:49*am, Jack wrote:

On Sep 21, 7:50*am, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 20, 7:54*pm, Jack wrote:

On Sep 20, 6:05*pm, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 20, 6:00*pm, "Canuck57" wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message

.. .

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8827/97690686.jpg

Maybe Texas should suceed before Obama racks up too much debt.. *Already a
world record for one idividual to rack up so much debt.

courtesy of the bush project to enrich the already rich by having the
middle class take it in the shorts

Maybe you should have studied and worked harder so you didn't end up
so "middle class".

as i said, the rich hates the middle class.

That's not what you said.

sure you did. i left your words intact above. what do you wish to
retract or deny?

My comment was about what *you* wrote, not what I wrote.

what you wrote was that if i was smart i wouldn't be middle class.
those are your words, not mine

*You wrote
"as i said, the rich hates the middle class", but that was not what
you had previously written. *Your previous statement was "courtesy of
the bush project to enrich the already rich by having the middle class
take it in the shorts" *That says nothing about hate of anyone.

this is what you wrote. i can understand why you're embarrassed:

Maybe you should have studied and worked harder so you
didn't end up
so "middle class".



At first I thought your non sequitur responses were deliberate
attempts to obfuscate the issue. *I'm starting to believe that your
inability to follow a thread in a logical manner is intrinsic to your
nature.


i quoted you, verbatim, above. so, again, i ask:

what's wrong with being middle class? you right wingers seem to think
it's a sign of failure.

wf3h wrote:
On Sep 21, 12:27 pm, Jack wrote:
On Sep 21, 11:07 am, wf3h wrote:





On Sep 21, 9:49 am, Jack wrote:
On Sep 21, 7:50 am, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 20, 7:54 pm, Jack wrote:
On Sep 20, 6:05 pm, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 20, 6:00 pm, "Canuck57" wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8827/97690686.jpg
Maybe Texas should suceed before Obama racks up too much debt. Already a
world record for one idividual to rack up so much debt.
courtesy of the bush project to enrich the already rich by having the
middle class take it in the shorts
Maybe you should have studied and worked harder so you didn't end up
so "middle class".

as i said, the rich hates the middle class.
That's not what you said.
sure you did. i left your words intact above. what do you wish to
retract or deny?
My comment was about what *you* wrote, not what I wrote.

what you wrote was that if i was smart i wouldn't be middle class.
those are your words, not mine

You wrote
"as i said, the rich hates the middle class", but that was not what
you had previously written. Your previous statement was "courtesy of
the bush project to enrich the already rich by having the middle class
take it in the shorts" That says nothing about hate of anyone.

this is what you wrote. i can understand why you're embarrassed:

Maybe you should have studied and worked harder so you
didn't end up
so "middle class".



At first I thought your non sequitur responses were deliberate
attempts to obfuscate the issue. I'm starting to believe that your
inability to follow a thread in a logical manner is intrinsic to your
nature.


i quoted you, verbatim, above. so, again, i ask:

what's wrong with being middle class? you right wingers seem to think
it's a sign of failure.


Too many Repubs think the only thing worth pursuing is wealth.


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

On Sep 21, 1:59*pm, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Sep 21, 12:27 pm, Jack wrote:
On Sep 21, 11:07 am, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 21, 9:49 am, Jack wrote:
On Sep 21, 7:50 am, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 20, 7:54 pm, Jack wrote:
On Sep 20, 6:05 pm, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 20, 6:00 pm, "Canuck57" wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
news:03ncb5hqbp27k9j58lgh7003r356b2fkem@4a x.com...
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8827/97690686.jpg
Maybe Texas should suceed before Obama racks up too much debt. *Already a
world record for one idividual to rack up so much debt.
courtesy of the bush project to enrich the already rich by having the
middle class take it in the shorts
Maybe you should have studied and worked harder so you didn't end up
so "middle class".

as i said, the rich hates the middle class.
That's not what you said.
sure you did. i left your words intact above. what do you wish to
retract or deny?
My comment was about what *you* wrote, not what I wrote.

what you wrote was that if i was smart i wouldn't be middle class.
those are your words, not mine

* You wrote
"as i said, the rich hates the middle class", but that was not what
you had previously written. *Your previous statement was "courtesy of
the bush project to enrich the already rich by having the middle class
take it in the shorts" *That says nothing about hate of anyone.

this is what you wrote. i can understand why you're embarrassed:

* Maybe you should have studied and worked harder so you
didn't end up
so "middle class".

At first I thought your non sequitur responses were deliberate
attempts to obfuscate the issue. *I'm starting to believe that your
inability to follow a thread in a logical manner is intrinsic to your
nature.

i quoted you, verbatim, above. so, again, i ask:

what's wrong with being middle class? you right wingers seem to think
it's a sign of failure.

Too many Repubs think the only thing worth pursuing is wealth.


after all, jesus was rich, right?

wf3h wrote:
On Sep 21, 1:59 pm, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Sep 21, 12:27 pm, Jack wrote:
On Sep 21, 11:07 am, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 21, 9:49 am, Jack wrote:
On Sep 21, 7:50 am, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 20, 7:54 pm, Jack wrote:
On Sep 20, 6:05 pm, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 20, 6:00 pm, "Canuck57" wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8827/97690686.jpg
Maybe Texas should suceed before Obama racks up too much debt. Already a
world record for one idividual to rack up so much debt.
courtesy of the bush project to enrich the already rich by having the
middle class take it in the shorts
Maybe you should have studied and worked harder so you didn't end up
so "middle class".
as i said, the rich hates the middle class.
That's not what you said.
sure you did. i left your words intact above. what do you wish to
retract or deny?
My comment was about what *you* wrote, not what I wrote.
what you wrote was that if i was smart i wouldn't be middle class.
those are your words, not mine
You wrote
"as i said, the rich hates the middle class", but that was not what
you had previously written. Your previous statement was "courtesy of
the bush project to enrich the already rich by having the middle class
take it in the shorts" That says nothing about hate of anyone.
this is what you wrote. i can understand why you're embarrassed:
Maybe you should have studied and worked harder so you
didn't end up
so "middle class".
At first I thought your non sequitur responses were deliberate
attempts to obfuscate the issue. I'm starting to believe that your
inability to follow a thread in a logical manner is intrinsic to your
nature.
i quoted you, verbatim, above. so, again, i ask:
what's wrong with being middle class? you right wingers seem to think
it's a sign of failure.
Too many Repubs think the only thing worth pursuing is wealth.


after all, jesus was rich, right?


These right-wing Repubs claim to be Christian but they have nothing in
common with the life and teachings of the guy they claim as savior. If
anything, they are the antiChrist.



--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:06:08 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Sep 21, 1:59*pm, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Sep 21, 12:27 pm, Jack wrote:
On Sep 21, 11:07 am, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 21, 9:49 am, Jack wrote:
On Sep 21, 7:50 am, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 20, 7:54 pm, Jack wrote:
On Sep 20, 6:05 pm, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 20, 6:00 pm, "Canuck57" wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
news:03ncb5hqbp27k9j58lgh7003r356b2fkem@4a x.com...
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8827/97690686.jpg
Maybe Texas should suceed before Obama racks up too much debt. *Already a
world record for one idividual to rack up so much debt.
courtesy of the bush project to enrich the already rich by having the
middle class take it in the shorts
Maybe you should have studied and worked harder so you didn't end up
so "middle class".

as i said, the rich hates the middle class.
That's not what you said.
sure you did. i left your words intact above. what do you wish to
retract or deny?
My comment was about what *you* wrote, not what I wrote.

what you wrote was that if i was smart i wouldn't be middle class.
those are your words, not mine

* You wrote
"as i said, the rich hates the middle class", but that was not what
you had previously written. *Your previous statement was "courtesy of
the bush project to enrich the already rich by having the middle class
take it in the shorts" *That says nothing about hate of anyone.

this is what you wrote. i can understand why you're embarrassed:

* Maybe you should have studied and worked harder so you
didn't end up
so "middle class".

At first I thought your non sequitur responses were deliberate
attempts to obfuscate the issue. *I'm starting to believe that your
inability to follow a thread in a logical manner is intrinsic to your
nature.

i quoted you, verbatim, above. so, again, i ask:

what's wrong with being middle class? you right wingers seem to think
it's a sign of failure.

Too many Repubs think the only thing worth pursuing is wealth.


after all, jesus was rich, right?

You're correct on this one;

NAS John 17:5 "Now, Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with
the glory which I had with You before the world was.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Sep 21, 12:27 pm, Jack wrote:
On Sep 21, 11:07 am, wf3h wrote:





On Sep 21, 9:49 am, Jack wrote:
On Sep 21, 7:50 am, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 20, 7:54 pm, Jack wrote:
On Sep 20, 6:05 pm, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 20, 6:00 pm, "Canuck57" wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8827/97690686.jpg
Maybe Texas should suceed before Obama racks up too much debt.
Already a
world record for one idividual to rack up so much debt.
courtesy of the bush project to enrich the already rich by
having the
middle class take it in the shorts
Maybe you should have studied and worked harder so you didn't
end up
so "middle class".

as i said, the rich hates the middle class.
That's not what you said.
sure you did. i left your words intact above. what do you wish to
retract or deny?
My comment was about what *you* wrote, not what I wrote.

what you wrote was that if i was smart i wouldn't be middle class.
those are your words, not mine

You wrote
"as i said, the rich hates the middle class", but that was not what
you had previously written. Your previous statement was "courtesy of
the bush project to enrich the already rich by having the middle class
take it in the shorts" That says nothing about hate of anyone.

this is what you wrote. i can understand why you're embarrassed:

Maybe you should have studied and worked harder so you
didn't end up
so "middle class".



At first I thought your non sequitur responses were deliberate
attempts to obfuscate the issue. I'm starting to believe that your
inability to follow a thread in a logical manner is intrinsic to your
nature.


i quoted you, verbatim, above. so, again, i ask:

what's wrong with being middle class? you right wingers seem to think
it's a sign of failure.


Too many Repubs think the only thing worth pursuing is wealth.



I pursue poverty, WAFA.

On Sep 21, 1:31*pm, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 21, 12:27*pm, Jack wrote:





On Sep 21, 11:07*am, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 21, 9:49*am, Jack wrote:

On Sep 21, 7:50*am, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 20, 7:54*pm, Jack wrote:

On Sep 20, 6:05*pm, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 20, 6:00*pm, "Canuck57" wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message

.. .

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8827/97690686.jpg

Maybe Texas should suceed before Obama racks up too much debt. *Already a
world record for one idividual to rack up so much debt.

courtesy of the bush project to enrich the already rich by having the
middle class take it in the shorts

Maybe you should have studied and worked harder so you didn't end up
so "middle class".
as i said, the rich hates the middle class.

That's not what you said.

sure you did. i left your words intact above. what do you wish to
retract or deny?

My comment was about what *you* wrote, not what I wrote.

what you wrote was that if i was smart i wouldn't be middle class.
those are your words, not mine

Those aren't my words.


**You wrote

"as i said, the rich hates the middle class", but that was not what
you had previously written. *Your previous statement was "courtesy of
the bush project to enrich the already rich by having the middle class
take it in the shorts" *That says nothing about hate of anyone.

this is what you wrote. i can understand why you're embarrassed:

* Maybe you should have studied and worked harder so you
didn't end up

so "middle class".
At first I thought your non sequitur responses were deliberate
attempts to obfuscate the issue. *I'm starting to believe that your
inability to follow a thread in a logical manner is intrinsic to your
nature.

i quoted you, verbatim, above. so, again, i ask:

what's wrong with being middle class? you right wingers seem to think
it's a sign of failure.

I don't think there's anything wrong with being middle class. You're
the one that was complaining about it, not me. I just observed that
if it's so bad being you, that *you* are the only one that could do,
or should have done, something about it.

On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:27:57 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Sep 21, 11:07*am, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 21, 9:49*am, Jack wrote:





On Sep 21, 7:50*am, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 20, 7:54*pm, Jack wrote:

On Sep 20, 6:05*pm, wf3h wrote:

On Sep 20, 6:00*pm, "Canuck57" wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message

.. .

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8827/97690686.jpg

Maybe Texas should suceed before Obama racks up too much debt. *Already a
world record for one idividual to rack up so much debt.

courtesy of the bush project to enrich the already rich by having the
middle class take it in the shorts

Maybe you should have studied and worked harder so you didn't end up
so "middle class".

as i said, the rich hates the middle class.

That's not what you said.

sure you did. i left your words intact above. what do you wish to
retract or deny?

My comment was about what *you* wrote, not what I wrote. You wrote
"as i said, the rich hates the middle class", but that was not what
you had previously written. Your previous statement was "courtesy of
the bush project to enrich the already rich by having the middle class
take it in the shorts" That says nothing about hate of anyone.


i'm proud to be middle class. you hate *us? i'm proud of that, too.

And that's not what I said, or implied. *Your attempts to spin and
create fact out of fallacy is duly noted. *It is your MO.-

again, what part of 'middle class' don't you understand?

I neither stated, or implied, that I hated anyone. What part of that
do you not understand?

At first I thought your non sequitur responses were deliberate
attempts to obfuscate the issue. I'm starting to believe that your
inability to follow a thread in a logical manner is intrinsic to your
nature.

cya

You're observation is probably correct, Jack. It's maddening how the
propagandists, mostly on the left of center, will employ logical
fallacy after logical fallacy and consider those fallacies to be
strong arguments. One can point out the ad hominem, the non sequitur,
the red herring, the strawman, the hasty generalization, et al, and
they'll resort to the very same fallacies. The reason those fallacies
work is because of the unspoken doctrine of overwhelming numbers.
Antagonists persist with these fallacies until opponents are worn out
from combating them. I haven't encountered a single logically-minded
'progressive' in this forum as of yet.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access