|
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
"Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 23, 10:43 am, "SteveB" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ... On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office, you have serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies. ?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to previous presidents, he seems pretty good to me. Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear the led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have. Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the same as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on the beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental imagery) Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that makes you feel better. With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine by yourself. I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO one voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or Obama) You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a political party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the deficiencies. Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You have LOADS of company. You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH?????? Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser. Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names? And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name? Definition of "LOSER": Anyone who is not smart enough to get a union or government job. Steve ;-) President Bush had the highest government job in the land, so by your definition, he is brilliant!! Jack ;-) I'd certainly like to be getting his deposit slip every month. And that's nothing to say about the man, his politics, what he did, etc, etc, etc. Just give me that deposit slip. PLEASE! Steve |
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
"Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 23, 1:25 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 23, 1:11 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ... On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office, you have serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies. ?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to previous presidents, he seems pretty good to me. Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear the led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have. Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the same as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on the beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental imagery) Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that makes you feel better. With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine by yourself. I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO one voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or Obama) You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a political party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the deficiencies. Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You have LOADS of company. You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH?????? Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser. Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names? And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name? Why would consider re-reading all his previous posts, since it would be obvious what I'm talking about. What would you call him? -- Nom=de=Plume Correct. Thank you, but calling him a loser more than once isn't appropriate. -- Nom=de=Plume There's that lack of reading comprehension again. Or are you being intentionally bitchy? reply: Debating with Nom=de=Plume is like debating a jellyfish and contesting the results. As Nancy Reagan said, JUST SAY NO. |
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:23:44 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 23, 1:25 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 23, 1:11 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ... On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office, you have serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies. ?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to previous presidents, he seems pretty good to me. Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear the led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have. Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the same as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on the beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental imagery) Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that makes you feel better. With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine by yourself. I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO one voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or Obama) You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a political party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the deficiencies. Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You have LOADS of company. You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH?????? Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser. Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names? And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name? Why would consider re-reading all his previous posts, since it would be obvious what I'm talking about. What would you call him? -- Nom=de=Plume Correct. Thank you, but calling him a loser more than once isn't appropriate. -- Nom=de=Plume There's that lack of reading comprehension again. Or are you being intentionally bitchy? reply: Debating with Nom=de=Plume is like debating a jellyfish and contesting the results. As Nancy Reagan said, JUST SAY NO. Too similar to 'debating' Harry. -- John H |
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
"SteveB" wrote in message
... "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 23, 1:25 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 23, 1:11 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ... On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office, you have serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies. ?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to previous presidents, he seems pretty good to me. Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear the led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have. Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the same as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on the beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental imagery) Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that makes you feel better. With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine by yourself. I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO one voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or Obama) You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a political party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the deficiencies. Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You have LOADS of company. You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH?????? Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser. Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names? And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name? Why would consider re-reading all his previous posts, since it would be obvious what I'm talking about. What would you call him? -- Nom=de=Plume Correct. Thank you, but calling him a loser more than once isn't appropriate. -- Nom=de=Plume There's that lack of reading comprehension again. Or are you being intentionally bitchy? reply: Debating with Nom=de=Plume is like debating a jellyfish and contesting the results. As Nancy Reagan said, JUST SAY NO. Meta message - you can't come up with a logical argument. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
|
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
On 9/23/09 9:52 PM, JustWait wrote:
Too similar to 'debating' Harry. Probably is... Your grief over your father's death is...underwhelming. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
On 23-Sep-2009, Jack wrote: You never answered - government "employee" or union member? *BOTH?????? Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser. Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names? And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name? "government employee" and "union member" would be insults to productive citizens |
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
On 23-Sep-2009, "SteveB" wrote: Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser. Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names? And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name? Definition of "LOSER": Anyone who is not smart enough to get a union or government job. Definition of "LOSER": Anyone who is so deficient they have no choice but to get a union or government job. |
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
On 23-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Definition of "LOSER": Anyone who is not smart enough to get a union or government job. Steve ;-) LOL - Does it count if I *had* a union job? I ran a forklift a long time ago and had to join. Yes, it's not a typical female job. Affirmative action put a girl behind the wheel of an iron-ballasted vehicle????? |
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:52:14 -0400, JustWait
wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:23:44 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 23, 1:25 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 23, 1:11 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ... On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office, you have serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies. ?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to previous presidents, he seems pretty good to me. Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear the led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have. Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the same as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on the beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental imagery) Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that makes you feel better. With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine by yourself. I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO one voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or Obama) You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a political party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the deficiencies. Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You have LOADS of company. You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH?????? Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser. Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names? And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name? Why would consider re-reading all his previous posts, since it would be obvious what I'm talking about. What would you call him? -- Nom=de=Plume Correct. Thank you, but calling him a loser more than once isn't appropriate. -- Nom=de=Plume There's that lack of reading comprehension again. Or are you being intentionally bitchy? reply: Debating with Nom=de=Plume is like debating a jellyfish and contesting the results. As Nancy Reagan said, JUST SAY NO. Too similar to 'debating' Harry. Probably is... De Plume is the quintessence of sophistry. Chaos has no better ally. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com