BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/110100-humor-obamas-low-pass-over-texas.html)

Jack[_3_] September 23rd 09 05:01 AM

Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
 
On Sep 22, 10:49*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

...





On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote:


If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office, you
have
serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies.


?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to
previous
presidents, he seems pretty good to me.


Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? *That's idiocy. I fear
the
led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. *And for Bush. And for
Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have..
Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the
same
as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on
the
beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental imagery)


Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in
office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that
makes
you feel better.


With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine
by
yourself.


I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO
one
voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or
Obama)


You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a
political
party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the
deficiencies.
Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You
have
LOADS of company.


You never answered - government "employee" or union member? *BOTH??????


Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser.


Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names?

And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name?

nom=de=plume September 23rd 09 06:11 AM

Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
 
"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

...





On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote:


If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office,
you
have
serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies.


?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to
previous
presidents, he seems pretty good to me.


Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear
the
led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for
Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have.
Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the
same
as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on
the
beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental
imagery)


Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in
office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that
makes
you feel better.


With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine
by
yourself.


I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO
one
voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or
Obama)


You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a
political
party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the
deficiencies.
Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You
have
LOADS of company.


You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH??????


Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser.


Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names?

And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name?



Why would consider re-reading all his previous posts, since it would be
obvious what I'm talking about.

What would you call him?

--
Nom=de=Plume



Jack[_3_] September 23rd 09 11:56 AM

Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
 
On Sep 23, 1:11*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"Steve" wrote in message


...


On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote:


If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office,
you
have
serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies.


?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to
previous
presidents, he seems pretty good to me.


Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear
the
led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for
Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have.
Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the
same
as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on
the
beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental
imagery)


Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in
office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that
makes
you feel better.


With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine
by
yourself.


I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO
one
voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or
Obama)


You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a
political
party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the
deficiencies.
Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You
have
LOADS of company.


You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH??????


Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser.


Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names?


And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name?


Why would consider re-reading all his previous posts, since it would be
obvious what I'm talking about.

What would you call him?

--
Nom=de=Plume


Correct.

SteveB September 23rd 09 03:43 PM

Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
 

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

...





On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote:


If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office,
you
have
serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies.


?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to
previous
presidents, he seems pretty good to me.


Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear
the
led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for
Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have.
Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the
same
as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on
the
beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental
imagery)


Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in
office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that
makes
you feel better.


With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine
by
yourself.


I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO
one
voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or
Obama)


You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a
political
party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the
deficiencies.
Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You
have
LOADS of company.


You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH??????


Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser.


Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names?

And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name?

Definition of "LOSER": Anyone who is not smart enough to get a union or
government job.

Steve ;-)



Jack[_3_] September 23rd 09 04:13 PM

Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
 
On Sep 23, 10:43*am, "SteveB" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Steve" wrote in message


...


On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote:


If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office,
you
have
serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies.


?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to
previous
presidents, he seems pretty good to me.


Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear
the
led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for
Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have.
Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the
same
as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on
the
beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental
imagery)


Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in
office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that
makes
you feel better.


With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine
by
yourself.


I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO
one
voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or
Obama)


You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a
political
party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the
deficiencies.
Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You
have
LOADS of company.


You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH??????


Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser.


Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names?

And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name?

Definition of "LOSER": *Anyone who is not smart enough to get a union or
government job.

Steve ;-)


President Bush had the highest government job in the land, so by your
definition, he is brilliant!!

Jack ;-)

nom=de=plume September 23rd 09 06:25 PM

Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
 
"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Sep 23, 1:11 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"Steve" wrote in message


...


On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote:


If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office,
you
have
serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies.


?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to
previous
presidents, he seems pretty good to me.


Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I
fear
the
led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for
Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would
have.
Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's
the
same
as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up
on
the
beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental
imagery)


Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put
in
office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that
makes
you feel better.


With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing
fine
by
yourself.


I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is
NO
one
voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo
or
Obama)


You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a
political
party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the
deficiencies.
Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You
have
LOADS of company.


You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH??????


Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser.


Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names?


And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name?


Why would consider re-reading all his previous posts, since it would be
obvious what I'm talking about.

What would you call him?

--
Nom=de=Plume


Correct.



Thank you, but calling him a loser more than once isn't appropriate.

--
Nom=de=Plume



nom=de=plume September 23rd 09 06:26 PM

Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
 
"SteveB" wrote in message
...

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

...





On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote:


If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office,
you
have
serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies.


?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to
previous
presidents, he seems pretty good to me.


Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear
the
led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for
Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would
have.
Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the
same
as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up
on
the
beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental
imagery)


Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put
in
office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that
makes
you feel better.


With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing
fine
by
yourself.


I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is
NO
one
voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or
Obama)


You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a
political
party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the
deficiencies.
Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You
have
LOADS of company.


You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH??????


Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser.


Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names?

And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name?

Definition of "LOSER": Anyone who is not smart enough to get a union or
government job.

Steve ;-)


LOL - Does it count if I *had* a union job? I ran a forklift a long time ago
and had to join. Yes, it's not a typical female job.

--
Nom=de=Plume



nom=de=plume September 23rd 09 06:27 PM

Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
 
"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Sep 23, 10:43 am, "SteveB" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Steve" wrote in message


...


On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote:


If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office,
you
have
serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies.


?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to
previous
presidents, he seems pretty good to me.


Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I
fear
the
led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for
Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would
have.
Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's
the
same
as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up
on
the
beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental
imagery)


Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put
in
office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that
makes
you feel better.


With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing
fine
by
yourself.


I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is
NO
one
voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo
or
Obama)


You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a
political
party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the
deficiencies.
Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You
have
LOADS of company.


You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH??????


Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser.


Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names?

And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name?

Definition of "LOSER": Anyone who is not smart enough to get a union or
government job.

Steve ;-)


President Bush had the highest government job in the land, so by your
definition, he is brilliant!!

Jack ;-)


I never thought (well, mostly) that GWB was stupid. I thought he was an
&*shole, but not stupid.



--
Nom=de=Plume



Jack[_3_] September 23rd 09 06:31 PM

Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
 
On Sep 23, 1:25*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Sep 23, 1:11 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Jack" wrote in message


....
On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:


"Steve" wrote in message


...


On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote:


If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office,
you
have
serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies.


?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to
previous
presidents, he seems pretty good to me.


Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I
fear
the
led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for
Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would
have.
Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's
the
same
as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up
on
the
beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental
imagery)


Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put
in
office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that
makes
you feel better.


With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing
fine
by
yourself.


I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is
NO
one
voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo
or
Obama)


You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a
political
party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the
deficiencies.
Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You
have
LOADS of company.


You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH??????


Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser.


Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names?


And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name?


Why would consider re-reading all his previous posts, since it would be
obvious what I'm talking about.


What would you call him?


--
Nom=de=Plume
Correct.


Thank you, but calling him a loser more than once isn't appropriate.

--
Nom=de=Plume


There's that lack of reading comprehension again. Or are you being
intentionally bitchy?

nom=de=plume September 23rd 09 08:10 PM

Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
 
"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Sep 23, 1:25 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Sep 23, 1:11 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Jack" wrote in message


...
On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:


"Steve" wrote in message


...


On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote:


If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in
office,
you
have
serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies.


?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to
previous
presidents, he seems pretty good to me.


Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I
fear
the
led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for
Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would
have.
Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's
the
same
as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes
up
on
the
beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental
imagery)


Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you*
put
in
office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if
that
makes
you feel better.


With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing
fine
by
yourself.


I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality
is
NO
one
voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo
or
Obama)


You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a
political
party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the
deficiencies.
Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status.
You
have
LOADS of company.


You never answered - government "employee" or union member?
BOTH??????


Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser.


Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names?


And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name?


Why would consider re-reading all his previous posts, since it would be
obvious what I'm talking about.


What would you call him?


--
Nom=de=Plume
Correct.


Thank you, but calling him a loser more than once isn't appropriate.

--
Nom=de=Plume


There's that lack of reading comprehension again. Or are you being
intentionally bitchy?



The latter of course. lol

--
Nom=de=Plume




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com