Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack wrote:
On Sep 17, 2:28 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: The Boston Tea Party was about taxation without representation. All the people protesting and calling themselves tea bag protesters have representation. Thus, what they are doing has nothing to do with the BTP. Only problem is, these people don't feel that they *do* have representation. They feel that the government, in general, is not representing their viewpoints. IOW, they feel they have representatives that aren't representing *them*, while still being taxed. Hey, relax. It was nothing more than a catchy name for just another demonstration from a group of activist. Both sides of the political spectrum has them all the time. This time the liberals smeared it with a vulgar reference that caught on. It didn't seem like you appreciated people being rude or vulgar. Maybe I'm wrong? Teabaggers, Birthers, Deathers, Tenthers - right-wing scumbags, all of them, just like you. They may feel as if they "don't have representation," but they do. They have the same right and ability to vote as every other voter. The country had eight years of their bull**** with Bush and decided it was time to move on, and with a black president. *That* is what is behind the right-wingers these days, their absolute intolerance for a black man in the White House. Not to worry; in 2016 the Democrats will nominate a Latino, and then, eight years later, a woman. By then, the white race will be a political minority. Maybe the ones who can't tolerate that will move to South Carolina or Texas and secede. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry the Klown wrote:
and with a black president. *That* is what is behind the right-wingers these days, their absolute intolerance for a black man in the White House. Ah, the race card. Call somebody a racist and watch their knees tremble. Too bad he's not a "black man". He's just as much a "white man" as he is a "black man". There are certainly many qualified black men who could do a far better job than the current "black man" in the White House. Bring them on. Who cares about the skin color? Democrats. Oppose Obama's policies = racist. Former President Jimmy Carter: An affable man, but a very misguided soul. Johnson |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Johnson" wrote in message ... Harry the Klown wrote: and with a black president. *That* is what is behind the right-wingers these days, their absolute intolerance for a black man in the White House. Ah, the race card. Call somebody a racist and watch their knees tremble. Too bad he's not a "black man". He's just as much a "white man" as he is a "black man". There are certainly many qualified black men who could do a far better job than the current "black man" in the White House. Bring them on. Who cares about the skin color? Democrats. Oppose Obama's policies = racist. Former President Jimmy Carter: An affable man, but a very misguided soul. Johnson I bet $20 that you could ask Jimmy what day it was and today's date, and he wouldn't get it right. The tapes I saw of him lately looked like he was going to drool at any second. And those Orphan Annie eyes ................ OY! Steve |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|