Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:16:40 -0600, SteveB wrote:
Personally, I think they should have let the kids have a day off, and have a closed door session with the teachers. And have one in a month and cut about 20% of the dead wood. But that's just me. I know a teacher who's near 30 years service who is retiring because he has to follow a syllabus on what to teach, which includes things that have nothing to do with the subject he is teaching. A loss. I have a son who just graduated college looking for a job, and who I think would make a good teacher. Lots of people who would make good teachers out there, and a lot of tenured POS's who need to be led away from the trough. If they cut the dead weight, believe me, there would be no shortage of applicants. Steve LOL, I haven't heard such a great argument *for* tenure in years. Tenure allows teachers to teach, without having to deal with BS like yours. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
thunder wrote:
On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:16:40 -0600, SteveB wrote: Personally, I think they should have let the kids have a day off, and have a closed door session with the teachers. And have one in a month and cut about 20% of the dead wood. But that's just me. I know a teacher who's near 30 years service who is retiring because he has to follow a syllabus on what to teach, which includes things that have nothing to do with the subject he is teaching. A loss. I have a son who just graduated college looking for a job, and who I think would make a good teacher. Lots of people who would make good teachers out there, and a lot of tenured POS's who need to be led away from the trough. If they cut the dead weight, believe me, there would be no shortage of applicants. Steve LOL, I haven't heard such a great argument *for* tenure in years. Tenure allows teachers to teach, without having to deal with BS like yours. Tenure at the higher education level came about as a way to ensure academic freedom at colleges and universities. Tenure in K-12 came about to protect classroom teachers from harassment at the hands of school administrators and school boards. That harassment for many female teachers was sexual. Nowadays, with even more crazed fundies, birthers, deathers, and the like attacking the public schools, classroom teachers need tenure more than ever. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "thunder" wrote in message ... On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:16:40 -0600, SteveB wrote: Personally, I think they should have let the kids have a day off, and have a closed door session with the teachers. And have one in a month and cut about 20% of the dead wood. But that's just me. I know a teacher who's near 30 years service who is retiring because he has to follow a syllabus on what to teach, which includes things that have nothing to do with the subject he is teaching. A loss. I have a son who just graduated college looking for a job, and who I think would make a good teacher. Lots of people who would make good teachers out there, and a lot of tenured POS's who need to be led away from the trough. If they cut the dead weight, believe me, there would be no shortage of applicants. Steve LOL, I haven't heard such a great argument *for* tenure in years. Tenure allows teachers to teach, without having to deal with BS like yours. I'm sorry, but we are talking about two different things. I am talking about teachers. You are talking about slugs who feed at the public trough. My, my, my. The concept of having my children taught by a teacher who doesn't have to deal with the BS of parents. Hmmmmmmmm. Wait, wait, I know the answer to this. Steve |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:30:04 -0600, SteveB wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:16:40 -0600, SteveB wrote: Personally, I think they should have let the kids have a day off, and have a closed door session with the teachers. And have one in a month and cut about 20% of the dead wood. But that's just me. I know a teacher who's near 30 years service who is retiring because he has to follow a syllabus on what to teach, which includes things that have nothing to do with the subject he is teaching. A loss. I have a son who just graduated college looking for a job, and who I think would make a good teacher. Lots of people who would make good teachers out there, and a lot of tenured POS's who need to be led away from the trough. If they cut the dead weight, believe me, there would be no shortage of applicants. Steve LOL, I haven't heard such a great argument *for* tenure in years. Tenure allows teachers to teach, without having to deal with BS like yours. I'm sorry, but we are talking about two different things. I am talking about teachers. You are talking about slugs who feed at the public trough. My, my, my. The concept of having my children taught by a teacher who doesn't have to deal with the BS of parents. Hmmmmmmmm. Wait, wait, I know the answer to this. Ah, yes, teaching by committee. Outstanding. GB Halsted is just one reason tenure for teachers was spread. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._B._Halsted |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "thunder" wrote in message t... On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:30:04 -0600, SteveB wrote: "thunder" wrote in message ... On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:16:40 -0600, SteveB wrote: Personally, I think they should have let the kids have a day off, and have a closed door session with the teachers. And have one in a month and cut about 20% of the dead wood. But that's just me. I know a teacher who's near 30 years service who is retiring because he has to follow a syllabus on what to teach, which includes things that have nothing to do with the subject he is teaching. A loss. I have a son who just graduated college looking for a job, and who I think would make a good teacher. Lots of people who would make good teachers out there, and a lot of tenured POS's who need to be led away from the trough. If they cut the dead weight, believe me, there would be no shortage of applicants. Steve LOL, I haven't heard such a great argument *for* tenure in years. Tenure allows teachers to teach, without having to deal with BS like yours. I'm sorry, but we are talking about two different things. I am talking about teachers. You are talking about slugs who feed at the public trough. My, my, my. The concept of having my children taught by a teacher who doesn't have to deal with the BS of parents. Hmmmmmmmm. Wait, wait, I know the answer to this. Ah, yes, teaching by committee. Outstanding. GB Halsted is just one reason tenure for teachers was spread. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._B._Halsted As our friend who is retired from the schools stated, there should be either tenure or unions, but not both. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Bout time he spoke up | General | |||
Bye Bye, Kids! | ASA | |||
Later, Kids... | ASA | |||
Later, Kids! | ASA | |||
Later kids... | ASA |