![]() |
When Bush 41 spoke to kids, Dims howled
Personally, I think the president should speak to students in support of
studying and staying in school. What I can't stomach is all the hypocrisy coming from the White House and Congress. For example: http://tinyurl.com/l5zqje |
When Bush 41 spoke to kids, Dims howled
On Sep 8, 10:54*am, JustWait wrote:
In article , says... Personally, I think the president should speak to students in support of studying and staying in school. What I can't stomach is all the hypocrisy coming from the White House and Congress. For example: http://tinyurl.com/l5zqje Well, isn't this interesting: snip The controversy over President Obama's speech to the nation's schoolchildren will likely be over shortly after Obama speaks today at Wakefield High School in Arlington, Virginia. But when President George H.W. Bush delivered a similar speech on October 1, 1991, from Alice Deal Junior High School in Washington DC, the controversy was just beginning. Democrats, then the majority party in Congress, not only denounced Bush's speech -- they also ordered the General Accounting Office to investigate its production and later summoned top Bush administration officials to Capitol Hill for an extensive hearing on the issue. /snip Sure makes a few people here seem pretty uninformed (being nice), especially the ones who suggested other presidents have not had any problems addressing students.. Hummmm. Makes you wonder what other "facts" and justifications they might have just "assumed" without basis in fact... snerk -- Wafa free since 2009 If the school drops the stupid worshipful lesson plan, I'd have no problem with Obama talking to the kids. My guess is that he'll bore em to death. |
When Bush 41 spoke to kids, Dims howled
Lu Powell wrote:
Personally, I think the president should speak to students in support of studying and staying in school. What I can't stomach is all the hypocrisy coming from the White House and Congress. For example: http://tinyurl.com/l5zqje Simple, it's all about content. Bush's speech, as well as Reagan's was LOADED with political speak. |
When Bush 41 spoke to kids, Dims howled
On Sep 8, 11:04*am, NotNow wrote:
Lu Powell wrote: Personally, I think the president should speak to students in support of studying and staying in school. What I can't stomach is all the hypocrisy coming from the White House and Congress. For example: http://tinyurl.com/l5zqje Simple, it's all about content. Bush's speech, as well as Reagan's was LOADED with political speak. The original Obama lesson plan was loaded with politics too (supporting the president etc.) and can stil be considerred political so why the surprise from the Dems? Considering their past reactions, the reactions to this are fairly mild. |
When Bush 41 spoke to kids, Dims howled
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... Personally, I think the president should speak to students in support of studying and staying in school. What I can't stomach is all the hypocrisy coming from the White House and Congress. For example: http://tinyurl.com/l5zqje Well, isn't this interesting: snip The controversy over President Obama's speech to the nation's schoolchildren will likely be over shortly after Obama speaks today at Wakefield High School in Arlington, Virginia. But when President George H.W. Bush delivered a similar speech on October 1, 1991, from Alice Deal Junior High School in Washington DC, the controversy was just beginning. Democrats, then the majority party in Congress, not only denounced Bush's speech -- they also ordered the General Accounting Office to investigate its production and later summoned top Bush administration officials to Capitol Hill for an extensive hearing on the issue. /snip Sure makes a few people here seem pretty uninformed (being nice), especially the ones who suggested other presidents have not had any problems addressing students.. Hummmm. Makes you wonder what other "facts" and justifications they might have just "assumed" without basis in fact... snerk The difference is in CONTENT, plain and simple. Both Bush's and Reagan's speeches were CLEARLY political in nature. That doesn't seem to bother you, but Obama's speech clearly talking about success and succeeding, has you in a twit. |
When Bush 41 spoke to kids, Dims howled
"NotNow" wrote in message ... JustWait wrote: In article , says... Personally, I think the president should speak to students in support of studying and staying in school. What I can't stomach is all the hypocrisy coming from the White House and Congress. For example: http://tinyurl.com/l5zqje Well, isn't this interesting: snip The controversy over President Obama's speech to the nation's schoolchildren will likely be over shortly after Obama speaks today at Wakefield High School in Arlington, Virginia. But when President George H.W. Bush delivered a similar speech on October 1, 1991, from Alice Deal Junior High School in Washington DC, the controversy was just beginning. Democrats, then the majority party in Congress, not only denounced Bush's speech -- they also ordered the General Accounting Office to investigate its production and later summoned top Bush administration officials to Capitol Hill for an extensive hearing on the issue. /snip Sure makes a few people here seem pretty uninformed (being nice), especially the ones who suggested other presidents have not had any problems addressing students.. Hummmm. Makes you wonder what other "facts" and justifications they might have just "assumed" without basis in fact... snerk The difference is in CONTENT, plain and simple. Both Bush's and Reagan's speeches were CLEARLY political in nature. That doesn't seem to bother you, but Obama's speech clearly talking about success and succeeding, has you in a twit. I'm not "in a twit". You Dims act as though you can do no wrong and the Cons can do no right. The reality is that both factions play a constant game of trying to destroy each other while the country goes to hell in a hand basket. Imagine how much greatness can be accomplished if it doesn't matter who gets the credit. |
When Bush 41 spoke to kids, Dims howled
In article ,
says... Lu Powell wrote: Personally, I think the president should speak to students in support of studying and staying in school. What I can't stomach is all the hypocrisy coming from the White House and Congress. For example: http://tinyurl.com/l5zqje Simple, it's all about content. Bush's speech, as well as Reagan's was LOADED with political speak. Oh my...... "is, is" again... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
When Bush 41 spoke to kids, Dims howled
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... Personally, I think the president should speak to students in support of studying and staying in school. What I can't stomach is all the hypocrisy coming from the White House and Congress. For example: http://tinyurl.com/l5zqje Well, isn't this interesting: snip The controversy over President Obama's speech to the nation's schoolchildren will likely be over shortly after Obama speaks today at Wakefield High School in Arlington, Virginia. But when President George H.W. Bush delivered a similar speech on October 1, 1991, from Alice Deal Junior High School in Washington DC, the controversy was just beginning. Democrats, then the majority party in Congress, not only denounced Bush's speech -- they also ordered the General Accounting Office to investigate its production and later summoned top Bush administration officials to Capitol Hill for an extensive hearing on the issue. /snip Sure makes a few people here seem pretty uninformed (being nice), especially the ones who suggested other presidents have not had any problems addressing students.. Hummmm. Makes you wonder what other "facts" and justifications they might have just "assumed" without basis in fact... snerk The difference is in CONTENT, plain and simple. Both Bush's and Reagan's speeches were CLEARLY political in nature. That doesn't seem to bother you, but Obama's speech clearly talking about success and succeeding, has you in a twit. Please tell us what part of parts of Regan, and Bush's speeches were political, be specific, and of course from your own interpretation based on hearing the speeches (which I assume you did based on your accusation), not some google cut and paste, please. I am very interested in your answer... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
When Bush 41 spoke to kids, Dims howled
Lu Powell wrote:
"NotNow" wrote in message ... JustWait wrote: In article , says... Personally, I think the president should speak to students in support of studying and staying in school. What I can't stomach is all the hypocrisy coming from the White House and Congress. For example: http://tinyurl.com/l5zqje Well, isn't this interesting: snip The controversy over President Obama's speech to the nation's schoolchildren will likely be over shortly after Obama speaks today at Wakefield High School in Arlington, Virginia. But when President George H.W. Bush delivered a similar speech on October 1, 1991, from Alice Deal Junior High School in Washington DC, the controversy was just beginning. Democrats, then the majority party in Congress, not only denounced Bush's speech -- they also ordered the General Accounting Office to investigate its production and later summoned top Bush administration officials to Capitol Hill for an extensive hearing on the issue. /snip Sure makes a few people here seem pretty uninformed (being nice), especially the ones who suggested other presidents have not had any problems addressing students.. Hummmm. Makes you wonder what other "facts" and justifications they might have just "assumed" without basis in fact... snerk The difference is in CONTENT, plain and simple. Both Bush's and Reagan's speeches were CLEARLY political in nature. That doesn't seem to bother you, but Obama's speech clearly talking about success and succeeding, has you in a twit. I'm not "in a twit". You Dims act as though you can do no wrong and the Cons can do no right. The reality is that both factions play a constant game of trying to destroy each other while the country goes to hell in a hand basket. Imagine how much greatness can be accomplished if it doesn't matter who gets the credit. I give the "Cons" most of the credit for destroying this country and everything good about it. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com