I just don't get it...
 

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...
He was not particularly violent. I stand by my previous comments.
Disagreeing with someone doesn't mean they would be enemies.


Nom=de=Plume


Non violent? He was wounded a couple times and was in a bunch of major
battles. Mohammidism would not be big today if his armies had not
conquered most of Europe. He was knocking on the door to Paris when he
was forced back to the African continent.

I actually said not particularly violent, but he was. Ok. That wasn't the
important part of his message though. Jesus would not have agreed with him
on this but He would have forgiven him.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I just don't get it...
 

On Sep 10, 12:50*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Calif Bill" wrote in message

m...

He was not particularly violent. I stand by my previous comments.
Disagreeing with someone doesn't mean they would be enemies.

Nom=de=Plume

Non violent? *He was wounded a couple times and was in a bunch of major
battles. *Mohammidism would not be big today if his armies had not
conquered most of Europe. *He was knocking on the door to Paris when he
was forced back to the African continent.

I actually said not particularly violent, but he was. Ok. That wasn't the
important part of his message though. Jesus would not have agreed with him
on this but He would have forgiven him.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Ah! sens raisonnable que vous avez finalement fait !

I just don't get it...
 

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Sep 10, 12:50 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Calif Bill" wrote in message

m...

He was not particularly violent. I stand by my previous comments.
Disagreeing with someone doesn't mean they would be enemies.

Nom=de=Plume

Non violent? He was wounded a couple times and was in a bunch of major
battles. Mohammidism would not be big today if his armies had not
conquered most of Europe. He was knocking on the door to Paris when he
was forced back to the African continent.

I actually said not particularly violent, but he was. Ok. That wasn't the
important part of his message though. Jesus would not have agreed with him
on this but He would have forgiven him.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Ah! sens raisonnable que vous avez finalement fait !


Unlike others, I admit it when I'm wrong, even if it takes a while. Where
are my Freedom Fries when I need them!

--
Nom=de=Plume

I just don't get it...
 

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:50:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
news:vIudnW2omIbrEzXXnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink. com...
He was not particularly violent. I stand by my previous comments.
Disagreeing with someone doesn't mean they would be enemies.


Nom=de=Plume


Non violent? He was wounded a couple times and was in a bunch of major
battles. Mohammidism would not be big today if his armies had not
conquered most of Europe. He was knocking on the door to Paris when he
was forced back to the African continent.

I actually said not particularly violent, but he was. Ok. That wasn't the
important part of his message though. Jesus would not have agreed with him
on this but He would have forgiven him.

If you listen to Gore Vidal he will tell you Jesus wasn't all that
much of a pacifist. "Throwing out the money changers" involved a
pretty bloody battle in itself.


Never said he was actually. I guess it's tough to figure out what is
justifiable violence and what itsn't.

Not many dispute WW2 as justifiable, yet VN is just the opposite.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I just don't get it...
 

On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 06:27:04 -0400, H the K
wrote:

Jack wrote:
On Sep 8, 9:00 pm, H the K wrote:
Jack wrote:

I doubt jesus would approve of the horrors conducted in his name.
His name is Jesus.
Neither his mama nor his father nor anyone he knew called him "Jesus."
"Jesus" was not his name.

Yeshua, probably, was his real name. If memory serves, "jesus" isn't
even a proper translation into greek of Yeshua.

Further, whatever the name, "is" is the wrong very form.


It's obvious you don't "know" him.


Neither do you, jackoff.

I like the not-so-subtle reference to "knowing" Jesus.

As if Jackoff has a clue. If he does, he's a two-faced "LIAR"!