BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   I just don't get it... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/109576-i-just-dont-get.html)

Jack[_3_] September 9th 09 03:44 AM

I just don't get it...
 
On Sep 8, 9:00*pm, H the K wrote:
Jack wrote:

I doubt jesus would approve of the horrors conducted in his name.


His name is Jesus.


Neither his mama nor his father nor anyone he knew called him "Jesus."
"Jesus" was not his name.

Yeshua, probably, was his real name. If memory serves, "jesus" isn't
even a proper translation into greek of Yeshua.

Further, whatever the name, "is" is the wrong very form.


It's obvious you don't "know" him.


Jack[_3_] September 9th 09 03:50 AM

I just don't get it...
 
On Sep 8, 10:15*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Sep 8, 5:52 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Katie Ohara" wrote in message


....


I think Jesus and Mohammed would have been friends.


--
Nom=de=Plume
Nom: Now think about that a little more (Jesus and Mo being
friends), Jesus was a sorta Flower Power love everybody type whereas
Mo was a bloodthirsty warlord. I doubt they'd see eye to eye.


Completely untrue:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad


Not so fast:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_as_a_general


Jesus would hardly approve.


1) Jesus would hardly approve of the Crusades or any other violence by
Christains.

2) From the link I provided:

Muslims thus consider him the restorer of the uncorrupted original
monotheistic faith (islam) of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and other
prophets.

Next to Muhammad's tomb, there is another empty tomb that Muslims believe
awaits Jesus.


Thanks for the strawman. None of which, of course, disproves Mohammed
was a warrior. The fact is, he was.

What did you post the other day? Oh yeah, "a swing, and a miss!"
~snerk~

nom=de=plume September 9th 09 05:58 AM

I just don't get it...
 
"Jack" wrote in message
...
Completely untrue:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad


Not so fast:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_as_a_general


Jesus would hardly approve.


1) Jesus would hardly approve of the Crusades or any other violence by
Christains.

2) From the link I provided:

Muslims thus consider him the restorer of the uncorrupted original
monotheistic faith (islam) of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and other
prophets.

Next to Muhammad's tomb, there is another empty tomb that Muslims believe
awaits Jesus.

Thanks for the strawman. None of which, of course, disproves Mohammed
was a warrior. The fact is, he was.


It sure is easy it seems for you to attack just about anyone if they have a
different opinion.

--
Nom=de=Plume



jps September 9th 09 08:44 AM

I just don't get it...
 
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:58:11 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Jack" wrote in message
...
Completely untrue:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad


Not so fast:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_as_a_general


Jesus would hardly approve.


1) Jesus would hardly approve of the Crusades or any other violence by
Christains.

2) From the link I provided:

Muslims thus consider him the restorer of the uncorrupted original
monotheistic faith (islam) of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and other
prophets.

Next to Muhammad's tomb, there is another empty tomb that Muslims believe
awaits Jesus.

Thanks for the strawman. None of which, of course, disproves Mohammed
was a warrior. The fact is, he was.


It sure is easy it seems for you to attack just about anyone if they have a
different opinion.


Cocksure, Jack Goff is.

H the K[_2_] September 9th 09 11:27 AM

I just don't get it...
 
Jack wrote:
On Sep 8, 9:00 pm, H the K wrote:
Jack wrote:

I doubt jesus would approve of the horrors conducted in his name.
His name is Jesus.

Neither his mama nor his father nor anyone he knew called him "Jesus."
"Jesus" was not his name.

Yeshua, probably, was his real name. If memory serves, "jesus" isn't
even a proper translation into greek of Yeshua.

Further, whatever the name, "is" is the wrong very form.


It's obvious you don't "know" him.



Neither do you, jackoff.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

H the K[_2_] September 9th 09 11:30 AM

I just don't get it...
 
jps wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:58:11 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Jack" wrote in message
...
Completely untrue:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad
Not so fast:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_as_a_general
Jesus would hardly approve.
1) Jesus would hardly approve of the Crusades or any other violence by
Christains.

2) From the link I provided:

Muslims thus consider him the restorer of the uncorrupted original
monotheistic faith (islam) of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and other
prophets.

Next to Muhammad's tomb, there is another empty tomb that Muslims believe
awaits Jesus.

Thanks for the strawman. None of which, of course, disproves Mohammed
was a warrior. The fact is, he was.

It sure is easy it seems for you to attack just about anyone if they have a
different opinion.


Cocksure, Jack Goff is.



Jackoff claims to be a "christian." Jesus wouldn't agree.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

Jack[_3_] September 9th 09 11:42 AM

I just don't get it...
 
On Sep 9, 12:58*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...



Completely untrue:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad


Not so fast:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_as_a_general


Jesus would hardly approve.


1) Jesus would hardly approve of the Crusades or any other violence by
Christains.


2) From the link I provided:


Muslims thus consider him the restorer of the uncorrupted original
monotheistic faith (islam) of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and other
prophets.


Next to Muhammad's tomb, there is another empty tomb that Muslims believe
awaits Jesus.


Thanks for the strawman. *None of which, of course, disproves Mohammed
was a warrior. *The fact is, he was.


It sure is easy it seems for you to attack just about anyone if they have a
different opinion.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Take a look in the mirror, nom. Those were *your* words, bounced
right back at you. If that was an attack, you had no problem pulling
one off yourself.

Contrary to your opinion, I posted proof that Mohammed spent ten years
of his life building an army by defeating one tribe at a time, until
he was powerful enough to defeat Mecca. A general, a warrior, a
warlord. He sure didn't turn the other cheek.

You do seem to be full of a lot of "opinion".

H the K[_2_] September 9th 09 11:51 AM

I just don't get it...
 
Jack wrote:

You do seem to be full of a lot of "opinion".




And you seem to be full of racism, mean-spiritedness, and, of course,
bull****.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

nom=de=plume September 9th 09 06:56 PM

I just don't get it...
 
"jps" wrote in message
...
It sure is easy it seems for you to attack just about anyone if they have
a
different opinion.


Cocksure, Jack Goff is.



Yoda?

--
Nom=de=Plume



nom=de=plume September 9th 09 06:58 PM

I just don't get it...
 
"Jack" wrote in message
...
It sure is easy it seems for you to attack just about anyone if they have
a
different opinion.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Take a look in the mirror, nom. Those were *your* words, bounced
right back at you. If that was an attack, you had no problem pulling
one off yourself.


Which words? Where? I never attacked you or anyone else here.

Contrary to your opinion, I posted proof that Mohammed spent ten years
of his life building an army by defeating one tribe at a time, until
he was powerful enough to defeat Mecca. A general, a warrior, a
warlord. He sure didn't turn the other cheek.


And he did this because?? Read it again and let us know when you have the
answer.

You do seem to be full of a lot of "opinion".


You seem to be rude for no reason I can fathom.

--
Nom=de=Plume




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com