I just don't get it...
 

On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:00:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
.. .
Bush definitely wasn't a racist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Dale_Guckert

No, he just hated Muslims.


Maybe he got confused with muslin. You know George....

Only if he confused Eric Prince with the Prince of Eqypt.


I'm reading Blackwater right now.. truly shocking and only 30 minutes from
DC.

Right wing Christian Muslim killers.

It's Jesus vs. Mohammed, with guns.

I just don't get it...
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:00:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
. ..
Bush definitely wasn't a racist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Dale_Guckert

No, he just hated Muslims.


Maybe he got confused with muslin. You know George....

Only if he confused Eric Prince with the Prince of Eqypt.


I'm reading Blackwater right now.. truly shocking and only 30 minutes from
DC.

Right wing Christian Muslim killers.

It's Jesus vs. Mohammed, with guns.


I think Jesus and Mohammed would have been friends.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I just don't get it...
 

On Sep 8, 4:44*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message

...



On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:00:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
. ..
Bush definitely wasn't a racist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Dale_Guckert

No, he just hated Muslims.

Maybe he got confused with muslin. You know George....

Only if he confused Eric Prince with the Prince of Eqypt.

I'm reading Blackwater right now.. truly shocking and only 30 minutes from
DC.

Right wing Christian Muslim killers.

It's Jesus vs. Mohammed, with guns.

I think Jesus and Mohammed would have been friends.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Nom: Now think about that a little more (Jesus and Mo being
friends), Jesus was a sorta Flower Power love everybody type whereas
Mo was a bloodthirsty warlord. I doubt they'd see eye to eye.

I just don't get it...
 

"Katie Ohara" wrote in message
...
I think Jesus and Mohammed would have been friends.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Nom: Now think about that a little more (Jesus and Mo being
friends), Jesus was a sorta Flower Power love everybody type whereas
Mo was a bloodthirsty warlord. I doubt they'd see eye to eye.


Completely untrue: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad

--
Nom=de=Plume

I just don't get it...
 

Katie Ohara wrote:
On Sep 8, 4:44 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message

...



On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:00:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
Bush definitely wasn't a racist.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Dale_Guckert
No, he just hated Muslims.
Maybe he got confused with muslin. You know George....
Only if he confused Eric Prince with the Prince of Eqypt.
I'm reading Blackwater right now.. truly shocking and only 30 minutes from
DC.
Right wing Christian Muslim killers.
It's Jesus vs. Mohammed, with guns.
I think Jesus and Mohammed would have been friends.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Nom: Now think about that a little more (Jesus and Mo being
friends), Jesus was a sorta Flower Power love everybody type whereas
Mo was a bloodthirsty warlord. I doubt they'd see eye to eye.


You apparently know nothing about Mohammed. On the other hand, you
probably know nothing about Jesus, either.


--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

I just don't get it...
 

On Sep 8, 5:52*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Katie Ohara" wrote in message

...

I think Jesus and Mohammed would have been friends.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Nom: *Now think about that a little more (Jesus and Mo being
friends), *Jesus was a sorta Flower Power love everybody type whereas
Mo was a bloodthirsty warlord. *I doubt they'd see eye to eye.

Completely untrue:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad


Not so fast: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_as_a_general

"Muhammad as a general refers to one of the roles played by the
Islamic prophet Muhammad as the leader of the ummah at Medina during
the last ten years of his life."

"Muhammad's critics often hold that the Muslims engaged in wars of
aggression, that they caused much bloodshed and suffering, that they
imposed Islam at the point of a sword, and that Muhammad's conduct is
not an example to be imitated."

Jesus would hardly approve.

I just don't get it...
 

Jack wrote:
On Sep 8, 5:52 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Katie Ohara" wrote in message

...

I think Jesus and Mohammed would have been friends.
--
Nom=de=Plume
Nom: Now think about that a little more (Jesus and Mo being
friends), Jesus was a sorta Flower Power love everybody type whereas
Mo was a bloodthirsty warlord. I doubt they'd see eye to eye.
Completely untrue:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad


Not so fast: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_as_a_general

"Muhammad as a general refers to one of the roles played by the
Islamic prophet Muhammad as the leader of the ummah at Medina during
the last ten years of his life."

"Muhammad's critics often hold that the Muslims engaged in wars of
aggression, that they caused much bloodshed and suffering, that they
imposed Islam at the point of a sword, and that Muhammad's conduct is
not an example to be imitated."

Jesus would hardly approve.


I doubt jesus would approve of the horrors conducted in his name.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

I just don't get it...
 

On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:17:00 -0400, H the K
wrote:

Jack wrote:
On Sep 8, 5:52 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Katie Ohara" wrote in message

...

I think Jesus and Mohammed would have been friends.
--
Nom=de=Plume
Nom: Now think about that a little more (Jesus and Mo being
friends), Jesus was a sorta Flower Power love everybody type whereas
Mo was a bloodthirsty warlord. I doubt they'd see eye to eye.
Completely untrue:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad


Not so fast: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_as_a_general

"Muhammad as a general refers to one of the roles played by the
Islamic prophet Muhammad as the leader of the ummah at Medina during
the last ten years of his life."

"Muhammad's critics often hold that the Muslims engaged in wars of
aggression, that they caused much bloodshed and suffering, that they
imposed Islam at the point of a sword, and that Muhammad's conduct is
not an example to be imitated."

Jesus would hardly approve.


I doubt jesus would approve of the horrors conducted in his name.

I'm quite certain he'd be horrified.

I just don't get it...
 

Jack wrote:

I doubt jesus would approve of the horrors conducted in his name.


His name is Jesus.



Neither his mama nor his father nor anyone he knew called him "Jesus."
"Jesus" was not his name.

Yeshua, probably, was his real name. If memory serves, "jesus" isn't
even a proper translation into greek of Yeshua.

Further, whatever the name, "is" is the wrong very form.


- - -



Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

I just don't get it...
 

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Sep 8, 5:52 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Katie Ohara" wrote in message

...

I think Jesus and Mohammed would have been friends.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Nom: Now think about that a little more (Jesus and Mo being
friends), Jesus was a sorta Flower Power love everybody type whereas
Mo was a bloodthirsty warlord. I doubt they'd see eye to eye.

Completely untrue:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad


Not so fast: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_as_a_general

Jesus would hardly approve.


1) Jesus would hardly approve of the Crusades or any other violence by
Christains.

2) From the link I provided:

Muslims thus consider him the restorer of the uncorrupted original
monotheistic faith (islam) of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and other
prophets.

Next to Muhammad's tomb, there is another empty tomb that Muslims believe
awaits Jesus.

--
Nom=de=Plume