On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:42:59 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
Are you a birther or a bircher? It's hard to figure it out from your
diatribe. I guess it was ok for Reagan and both Bushs to talk to kids, as
they were Republicans.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Reagan and Bush's depts of ed did not issue soviet-like directives
about their speeches. They also did not issue north korean-like
presidential worship lesson plans.

This is just looney... you can *say* this, but that doesn't make it true.

Most of us have no problems with
the pres speaking to the kids but the way it has been done is like
something from North Korea and shows how completely incompetant this
administration is.

Apparently it was ok when Reagan talked about his tax-cut proposals to kids
and when Bush the First asked kids to write him with how they could help
him.

But, it's not ok when Obama does this.

Quite frankly, the Obama admin seems to be composed of total morons.

Compared to what? Bush II?

There is no possible way that anybody with any intelligence would
allow these people to get anywhere near their health care. It would
not matter if 99% of voters voted for Obama and still supported him,
the other 1% should use any means necessary to prevent their lives
being put in danger by having morons running health care. You do not
allow the inmates of an asylum to run around with loaded guns no
matter how they vote.

Over 70% of the voting public is in favor of a public option, which despite
your attempt to make a competitive option sound like a gov't takeover of US
healthcare, isn't. So, what you're saying is that 70% of the voting public
has no intelligence. Quite a statement.

Statements coming from the right don't have to be true.

They just have to stir up some emotion that's sitting deep inside
these sore losers and bigots.