Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#92
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... John H. wrote: On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 08:48:23 -0400, NotNow wrote: John H. wrote: On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 22:35:01 -0400, JustWait wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:56:14 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:40:56 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 2, 5:34 pm, John H. wrote: On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:26:40 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:07:31 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "SteveB" wrote in message ... September 8, Obama will be piped into all public schools for a speech. Probably about how to snitch on their parents. This is scary. This is sick. Steve Is he going to read "My Pet Goat"? If so, I'm pulling my kid that day! -- Nom=de=Plume I believe there will be a mention of "Sally has two Moms" and other liberal literature. Reading for educational purposes, you know. We shall only know what he will say after he says it. I hope he does a decent job with the teleprompters, and the kids don't start saying uh and er after every other word. Perhaps I was premature in thinking that he will concentrate only on education, and that there will be no political expressions, either stated or subliminal. Steve Silly dweeb didn't mention a word when Bush was mangling the English language beyond recognition. Cracker jerk from the Utah bush. Another fine example of the 'Bush Rationale'. nomdeplume - hope you're watching.. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. The president has no more right to interrupt classroom education than I do. Those of you who think he does should go back and re-read the constitution because you seem so enamored of authority you are willing to fall for anything. School districts are totally free to ignore him and I say they should unless he can show that his address is somehow related to education and is not for political purposes.. Boo! The Boogeyman is comin' to getcha!!! Would you have said the same for Bush if he were asking to address your kids on the merits of duck and cover? More 'Bush Rationale'. nomdeplum - you watching this? Anyway, what day is the Obama stump speech? Might just take The Mouse to the track for some work that day... Take her to the track on the 8th. That's the BO school kid indoctrination speech. Happens at 11 am, eastern. If Jesse's lucky, she'll be at lunch where their are no TV's. -- John H This **** is getting so unhinged it's almost funny! Obama wants to give a speech to students reinforcing such things as hard work, staying in school, doing your best, and you call it an indoctrination speech. In 1988 Reagan did the same thing, only his speech was 100% political. Then in I think 1992, George HW Bush did the same as Reagan. Where was the outcry about indoctrination then? This liberal = bad thing isn't doing much good for your credibility, John. Supposedly his speech will be revealed next week. We'll see how much indoctrination is therein. Having students write a letter about 'How I can help president 'bama' *is* indoctrination. -- John H Uh, John, your GOP gurus have lied to you once again!!!!! That was changed a long time ago. So, did they lie, or did the openness of the content get it changed? No, they lied. They were telling lies before they ever knew the content of said speech. It clearly is a letter to themselves about their educational goals. It's just that you guys, in your insanity over anything liberal, can't grasp that little fact.: And do you really believe teachers won't send the letters anyway? With kids names and schools?? Remember "flag@whitehouse......."? Fact is, detractors got listed and sent e-mails, but of course all investigation on that has been stopped too, the Whitehouse is required to keep all info coming in. Black helicopter, see it? Gee, you didn't seem to say anything about Reagan and GHWB doing the same thing, and as a matter of fact, while Obama wants to address students about things like staying in school, working hard, etc. Reagan was pushing his political agenda.... But, as with cussing, I'm sure it's okay with you that conservatives did that, but a liberal can't address students about staying in school..... PRESIDENT/STUDENT SPEECH FLAP-It seems innocuous enough. The President was going to kick off the unofficial start of the school year with a speech to the nation?s students, encouraging them to do their best. But an unexpected crush of criticism from parents, conservatives, and talk-radio seems to have turned this into one big headache. It certainly wasn?t anticipated-Jack Tapper, filing for WORLD NEWS, notes that ?White House officials seem to have been caught completely flat-footed on this?. And it seems local school districts who are hearing from angry constituents are reacting-Tapper notes that ?some school districts in Texas, Illinois, Virginia and Wisconsin are even refusing to show the President?s address.? What?s got everybody so riled up? Tapper again: ?What seems to be drawing the most ire are these optional preparatory materials from the Department of Education asking students to ?write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the President??.that has now been changed for students to ?write letters to themselves about how they can achieve their short-term and long-term educational goals.? White House deputy policy director Heather Higginbottom told Tapper that the ?goal of the speech is to encourage students to set goals for themselves?. The Administration is trying to lower the 30% drop-out rate in this country, Higginbottom added. So how did this get so politicized? Tapper notes that ?President George HW Bush (spoke to students) in 1991 and Ronald Reagan even talked politics with students in 1988.? But this is different, at least to some folks. Tapper sez that ?charges from Republican officials that President Obama is seeking to indoctrinate students-unsupported by any real evidence-have been flying.? But regardless of proof, the howl of protest is not going to be ignored by the White House. Tapper noted in his close that ?the White House will release a text of the speech on Monday?so parents can see it as benign, about staying in school and personal responsibility.? I will bet you my boat against yours that teachers will be sending these letters to the Messiah, and they will be used as political props just like the little girl who got "randomly" called on at an Obama town hall, only to complain about the "mean" anti reform care bill, and only to be found to be the child of the top fund raiser for Obama in the area.. snerk That's a bet!! Now remember, you have to prove all of the above, including the child of a top fund raiser. Here is my proof about the child prop, er, uh, "Astroturf"... http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/11...town-hall-has- not-so-random-political-connections/ http://pumabydesign001.wordpress.com...e-little-girl- as-a-plant-at-town-hall-mtg/ http://mommylife.net/archives/2009/0...town_hall.html Ok, bookmark this one... and we will wait for someone in the admin to read one of the letters... snerk Pssssst, you have proof of absolutely NOTHING because the event hasn't even happened yet. What? I just gave you proof of what I said. I said: snip just like the little girl who got "randomly" called on at an Obama town hall, only to complain about the "mean" anti reform care bill, and only to be found to be the child of the top fund raiser for Obama in the area.. snip And then I showed three seperate articles, how hard is that??? Why can't you seem to follow the conversation.. It is clear, I said something, you told me to prove it, I did... I just don't get it. -- Wafa free since 2009 |
#93
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 12:56:06 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... John H. wrote: On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 08:48:23 -0400, NotNow wrote: John H. wrote: On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 22:35:01 -0400, JustWait wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:56:14 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:40:56 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 2, 5:34 pm, John H. wrote: On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:26:40 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:07:31 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "SteveB" wrote in message ... September 8, Obama will be piped into all public schools for a speech. Probably about how to snitch on their parents. This is scary. This is sick. Steve Is he going to read "My Pet Goat"? If so, I'm pulling my kid that day! -- Nom=de=Plume I believe there will be a mention of "Sally has two Moms" and other liberal literature. Reading for educational purposes, you know. We shall only know what he will say after he says it. I hope he does a decent job with the teleprompters, and the kids don't start saying uh and er after every other word. Perhaps I was premature in thinking that he will concentrate only on education, and that there will be no political expressions, either stated or subliminal. Steve Silly dweeb didn't mention a word when Bush was mangling the English language beyond recognition. Cracker jerk from the Utah bush. Another fine example of the 'Bush Rationale'. nomdeplume - hope you're watching.. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. The president has no more right to interrupt classroom education than I do. Those of you who think he does should go back and re-read the constitution because you seem so enamored of authority you are willing to fall for anything. School districts are totally free to ignore him and I say they should unless he can show that his address is somehow related to education and is not for political purposes.. Boo! The Boogeyman is comin' to getcha!!! Would you have said the same for Bush if he were asking to address your kids on the merits of duck and cover? More 'Bush Rationale'. nomdeplum - you watching this? Anyway, what day is the Obama stump speech? Might just take The Mouse to the track for some work that day... Take her to the track on the 8th. That's the BO school kid indoctrination speech. Happens at 11 am, eastern. If Jesse's lucky, she'll be at lunch where their are no TV's. -- John H This **** is getting so unhinged it's almost funny! Obama wants to give a speech to students reinforcing such things as hard work, staying in school, doing your best, and you call it an indoctrination speech. In 1988 Reagan did the same thing, only his speech was 100% political. Then in I think 1992, George HW Bush did the same as Reagan. Where was the outcry about indoctrination then? This liberal = bad thing isn't doing much good for your credibility, John. Supposedly his speech will be revealed next week. We'll see how much indoctrination is therein. Having students write a letter about 'How I can help president 'bama' *is* indoctrination. -- John H Uh, John, your GOP gurus have lied to you once again!!!!! That was changed a long time ago. So, did they lie, or did the openness of the content get it changed? No, they lied. They were telling lies before they ever knew the content of said speech. It clearly is a letter to themselves about their educational goals. It's just that you guys, in your insanity over anything liberal, can't grasp that little fact.: And do you really believe teachers won't send the letters anyway? With kids names and schools?? Remember "flag@whitehouse......."? Fact is, detractors got listed and sent e-mails, but of course all investigation on that has been stopped too, the Whitehouse is required to keep all info coming in. Black helicopter, see it? Gee, you didn't seem to say anything about Reagan and GHWB doing the same thing, and as a matter of fact, while Obama wants to address students about things like staying in school, working hard, etc. Reagan was pushing his political agenda.... But, as with cussing, I'm sure it's okay with you that conservatives did that, but a liberal can't address students about staying in school..... PRESIDENT/STUDENT SPEECH FLAP-It seems innocuous enough. The President was going to kick off the unofficial start of the school year with a speech to the nation?s students, encouraging them to do their best. But an unexpected crush of criticism from parents, conservatives, and talk-radio seems to have turned this into one big headache. It certainly wasn?t anticipated-Jack Tapper, filing for WORLD NEWS, notes that ?White House officials seem to have been caught completely flat-footed on this?. And it seems local school districts who are hearing from angry constituents are reacting-Tapper notes that ?some school districts in Texas, Illinois, Virginia and Wisconsin are even refusing to show the President?s address.? What?s got everybody so riled up? Tapper again: ?What seems to be drawing the most ire are these optional preparatory materials from the Department of Education asking students to ?write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the President??.that has now been changed for students to ?write letters to themselves about how they can achieve their short-term and long-term educational goals.? White House deputy policy director Heather Higginbottom told Tapper that the ?goal of the speech is to encourage students to set goals for themselves?. The Administration is trying to lower the 30% drop-out rate in this country, Higginbottom added. So how did this get so politicized? Tapper notes that ?President George HW Bush (spoke to students) in 1991 and Ronald Reagan even talked politics with students in 1988.? But this is different, at least to some folks. Tapper sez that ?charges from Republican officials that President Obama is seeking to indoctrinate students-unsupported by any real evidence-have been flying.? But regardless of proof, the howl of protest is not going to be ignored by the White House. Tapper noted in his close that ?the White House will release a text of the speech on Monday?so parents can see it as benign, about staying in school and personal responsibility.? I will bet you my boat against yours that teachers will be sending these letters to the Messiah, and they will be used as political props just like the little girl who got "randomly" called on at an Obama town hall, only to complain about the "mean" anti reform care bill, and only to be found to be the child of the top fund raiser for Obama in the area.. snerk That's a bet!! Now remember, you have to prove all of the above, including the child of a top fund raiser. Here is my proof about the child prop, er, uh, "Astroturf"... http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/11...town-hall-has- not-so-random-political-connections/ http://pumabydesign001.wordpress.com...e-little-girl- as-a-plant-at-town-hall-mtg/ http://mommylife.net/archives/2009/0...town_hall.html Ok, bookmark this one... and we will wait for someone in the admin to read one of the letters... snerk Pssssst, you have proof of absolutely NOTHING because the event hasn't even happened yet. That's why he told you to bookmark it, Loogy. (holy ****) I think he is screwing with me now. It was a simple conversation to follow... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How fights begin... | General | |||
Let the feast begin.................. | General | |||
OT Let the Spinning Begin! | General | |||
Where does the yacht designer stop, and the builder begin? | Cruising | |||
Rafting on the Ocoee begin of April | General |