wf3h wrote:
On Sep 3, 9:00 am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Sep 2, 3:22 pm, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 12:18:37 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
On Sep 2, 2:32 pm, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:15:02 -0400, NotNow wrote:
Your thinking is flawed. What has happened in the past DOES have a
bearing on today. We're still spending money in Iraq, for instance.
Yes, Obama is. One must wonder why he is still there if so many
liberals think Iraq was a bad idea.
--
because we know bush ****ed it up so bad that we now have to clean the
mess up before we leave. i know that, to rednecks, they think liberals
want to cut and run, but that shows how little rednecks know about
anything
Uh, uh, what mess?
that you don't know tells us why we're in the mess we're in
that you can't state what the mess is tells us you don't know what you
are talking about

but, you still have the issue don't you-

the mess is that we've been there for 8 years and still haven't
resolve the problem. i know to you right wingers, that's not an issue
because a right wing president was failing, but to patriotic
americans, it IS a problem

You've stated that the mess is the problem and the a right wing
president was failing but, you haven't stated why we are in Afghanistan.
What is our goal in Afghanistan?

and part of the problem is that you, like bush, can't see the problem

You can't identify let alone state the problem.

You freaking liberals latched onto Afghanistan as the good war and
touted Iraq as the bad war. Iraq is quite and Afghanistan is turning to
crap and you have egg on your face.