wf3h wrote:
On Aug 27, 1:02 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message


Both parties are guilty. And things are not improving. With the current
administration spending like a drunken sailor,
as did the previous administration

Reply:
So it is OK to over spend now?-

so it's OK to blame only obama?

Doesn't the buck stop at Obama's desk now or does Obama have a time
machine to teleport it back to Bush?

On Aug 28, 7:49*am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 27, 1:02 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

Both parties are guilty. And things are not improving. With the current
administration spending like a drunken sailor,
as did the previous administration

Reply:
So it is OK to over spend now?-

so it's OK to blame only obama?

Doesn't the buck stop at Obama's desk now or does Obama have a time
machine to teleport it back to Bush?

do you also blame the police officer for arresting the criminal, or
the surgeon for cutting out a cancer?

wf3h wrote:
On Aug 28, 7:49 am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 27, 1:02 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message
Both parties are guilty. And things are not improving. With the current
administration spending like a drunken sailor,
as did the previous administration
Reply:
So it is OK to over spend now?-
so it's OK to blame only obama?
Doesn't the buck stop at Obama's desk now or does Obama have a time
machine to teleport it back to Bush?

do you also blame the police officer for arresting the criminal, or
the surgeon for cutting out a cancer?

One of the definitions of blame is appropriate. Yes, I hold responsible
the police officer for arresting the criminal and I hold responsible the
surgeon for cutting out a cancer.

On Aug 28, 8:52*am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:


do *you also blame the police officer for arresting the criminal, or
the surgeon for cutting out a cancer?

One of the definitions of blame is appropriate. Yes, I hold responsible
the police officer for arresting the criminal and I hold responsible the
surgeon for cutting out a cancer.-

well i guess one should never expect too much from redneck logic.

wf3h wrote:
On Aug 28, 8:52 am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:

do you also blame the police officer for arresting the criminal, or
the surgeon for cutting out a cancer?
One of the definitions of blame is appropriate. Yes, I hold responsible
the police officer for arresting the criminal and I hold responsible the
surgeon for cutting out a cancer.-

well i guess one should never expect too much from redneck logic.


You're expecting intelligence from someone who couldn't get into
college, joined the marines, and was so good at that, he never got an
overseas posting?

H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 28, 8:52 am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:

do you also blame the police officer for arresting the criminal, or
the surgeon for cutting out a cancer?
One of the definitions of blame is appropriate. Yes, I hold responsible
the police officer for arresting the criminal and I hold responsible the
surgeon for cutting out a cancer.-

well i guess one should never expect too much from redneck logic.


You're expecting intelligence from someone who couldn't get into
college, joined the marines, and was so good at that, he never got an
overseas posting?

Harry at least my name is on the title to my house. How much does Karen
charge you for rent each month?

BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 28, 8:52 am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:

do you also blame the police officer for arresting the criminal, or
the surgeon for cutting out a cancer?
One of the definitions of blame is appropriate. Yes, I hold responsible
the police officer for arresting the criminal and I hold responsible
the
surgeon for cutting out a cancer.-

well i guess one should never expect too much from redneck logic.


You're expecting intelligence from someone who couldn't get into
college, joined the marines, and was so good at that, he never got an
overseas posting?

Harry at least my name is on the title to my house. How much does Karen
charge you for rent each month?



Ahhh...I see you are still Mr. Simple-Minded.

BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 28, 7:49 am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 27, 1:02 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message
Both parties are guilty. And things are not improving. With the
current
administration spending like a drunken sailor,
as did the previous administration
Reply:
So it is OK to over spend now?-
so it's OK to blame only obama?
Doesn't the buck stop at Obama's desk now or does Obama have a time
machine to teleport it back to Bush?

do you also blame the police officer for arresting the criminal, or
the surgeon for cutting out a cancer?

One of the definitions of blame is appropriate. Yes, I hold responsible
the police officer for arresting the criminal and I hold responsible the
surgeon for cutting out a cancer.


Most thinking people realize it is going to take Obama years to clean up
the messes left by his predecessor.

On Aug 28, 8:58*am, H the K wrote:


Most thinking people realize it is going to take Obama years to clean up
the messes left by his predecessor.-

seems the right thinks he should have had it cleared up by 12:05 on
jan. 20. and they bitch about EVERYTHING he does...

wf3h wrote:
On Aug 28, 8:58 am, H the K wrote:

Most thinking people realize it is going to take Obama years to clean up
the messes left by his predecessor.-

seems the right thinks he should have had it cleared up by 12:05 on
jan. 20. and they bitch about EVERYTHING he does...


The reality, which the Repubs are working so hard to deny:

Every single issue and problem this country faces is the result of
nonfeasance, malfeasance, and misfeasance on the part of the Bush
Administration.

All the GOP has to sell these days is fear.

Imagine how sad your situation is when your "salesmen" are the likes of
JustWait, herring, jackoff, lu-ser, and the rest of the aging white
trash that makes up the majority of the right here.