On Aug 25, 11:13*am, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:54:16 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Aug 25, 10:27*am, Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 25, 10:21*am, Frogwatch wrote:

Are you sure you want a bill with this provision to pass?http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57435888264288...

I do not think including this was an accident but was intentional. *If
this passes, ALL small businesses, the driver of our economy will be
forced to close because we all make mistakes and will be fined the
maximum amount. *I believe this inclusion was intentional to destroy
the US economy and force us into socialism.
Kinda seems to be a whiff of blood and gunpowder in the air but I
cannot find the source.

first of all, the WSJ is hardly an objective source. it's a cheering
section for the folks who got us into this mess in the first place

further, it's their goal to oppose ANY provisions which level the
playing field in favor of the middle class. one person has called the
"WSJ" 'quaintly reactionary'. and it is.

Ad hominem argument.


said the only man in america who doesn't know the political
orientation of the WSJ.

hint: it aint the 'pennysaver'.

wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 11:13 am, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:54:16 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Aug 25, 10:27 am, Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 25, 10:21 am, Frogwatch wrote:
Are you sure you want a bill with this provision to pass?http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57435888264288...
I do not think including this was an accident but was intentional. If
this passes, ALL small businesses, the driver of our economy will be
forced to close because we all make mistakes and will be fined the
maximum amount. I believe this inclusion was intentional to destroy
the US economy and force us into socialism.
Kinda seems to be a whiff of blood and gunpowder in the air but I
cannot find the source.
first of all, the WSJ is hardly an objective source. it's a cheering
section for the folks who got us into this mess in the first place
further, it's their goal to oppose ANY provisions which level the
playing field in favor of the middle class. one person has called the
"WSJ" 'quaintly reactionary'. and it is.
Ad hominem argument.


said the only man in america who doesn't know the political
orientation of the WSJ.

hint: it aint the 'pennysaver'.

The WSJ, Forbes, Investors...et cetera, all push the extreme right wing
position at all times.

On Aug 25, 12:35*pm, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 11:13 am, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:54:16 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 25, 10:27 am, Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 25, 10:21 am, Frogwatch wrote:
Are you sure you want a bill with this provision to pass?http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57435888264288...
I do not think including this was an accident but was intentional. *If
this passes, ALL small businesses, the driver of our economy will be
forced to close because we all make mistakes and will be fined the
maximum amount. *I believe this inclusion was intentional to destroy
the US economy and force us into socialism.
Kinda seems to be a whiff of blood and gunpowder in the air but I
cannot find the source.
first of all, the WSJ is hardly an objective source. it's a cheering
section for the folks who got us into this mess in the first place
further, it's their goal to oppose ANY provisions which level the
playing field in favor of the middle class. one person has called the
"WSJ" 'quaintly reactionary'. and it is.
Ad hominem argument.

said the only man in america who doesn't know the political
orientation of the WSJ.

hint: it aint the 'pennysaver'.

The WSJ, Forbes, Investors...et cetera, all push the extreme right wing
position at all times.

Meanwhile, Obama gives $2 billion to an oil company in Brazil whose
main shareholder is ..........George Soros. This is while the Dems
forbid offshore drilling here.

Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 25, 12:35 pm, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 11:13 am, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:54:16 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
On Aug 25, 10:27 am, Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 25, 10:21 am, Frogwatch wrote:
Are you sure you want a bill with this provision to pass?http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57435888264288...
I do not think including this was an accident but was intentional. If
this passes, ALL small businesses, the driver of our economy will be
forced to close because we all make mistakes and will be fined the
maximum amount. I believe this inclusion was intentional to destroy
the US economy and force us into socialism.
Kinda seems to be a whiff of blood and gunpowder in the air but I
cannot find the source.
first of all, the WSJ is hardly an objective source. it's a cheering
section for the folks who got us into this mess in the first place
further, it's their goal to oppose ANY provisions which level the
playing field in favor of the middle class. one person has called the
"WSJ" 'quaintly reactionary'. and it is.
Ad hominem argument.
said the only man in america who doesn't know the political
orientation of the WSJ.
hint: it aint the 'pennysaver'.
The WSJ, Forbes, Investors...et cetera, all push the extreme right wing
position at all times.

Meanwhile, Obama gives $2 billion to an oil company in Brazil whose
main shareholder is ..........George Soros. This is while the Dems
forbid offshore drilling here.

It's far from the quick fix some on the right think it is, nor is it a
guarantee of oil independency

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:21:36 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 25, 12:35 pm, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 11:13 am, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:54:16 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
On Aug 25, 10:27 am, Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 25, 10:21 am, Frogwatch wrote:
Are you sure you want a bill with this provision to pass?http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57435888264288...
I do not think including this was an accident but was intentional. If
this passes, ALL small businesses, the driver of our economy will be
forced to close because we all make mistakes and will be fined the
maximum amount. I believe this inclusion was intentional to destroy
the US economy and force us into socialism.
Kinda seems to be a whiff of blood and gunpowder in the air but I
cannot find the source.
first of all, the WSJ is hardly an objective source. it's a cheering
section for the folks who got us into this mess in the first place
further, it's their goal to oppose ANY provisions which level the
playing field in favor of the middle class. one person has called the
"WSJ" 'quaintly reactionary'. and it is.
Ad hominem argument.
said the only man in america who doesn't know the political
orientation of the WSJ.
hint: it aint the 'pennysaver'.
The WSJ, Forbes, Investors...et cetera, all push the extreme right wing
position at all times.

Meanwhile, Obama gives $2 billion to an oil company in Brazil whose
main shareholder is ..........George Soros. This is while the Dems
forbid offshore drilling here.

It's far from the quick fix some on the right think it is, nor is it a
guarantee of oil independency

But it provides greater latitude and mobility.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Aug 25, 1:24*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:21:36 -0400, NotNow wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 25, 12:35 pm, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 11:13 am, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:54:16 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
On Aug 25, 10:27 am, Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 25, 10:21 am, Frogwatch wrote:
Are you sure you want a bill with this provision to pass?http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57435888264288...
I do not think including this was an accident but was intentional.. *If
this passes, ALL small businesses, the driver of our economy will be
forced to close because we all make mistakes and will be fined the
maximum amount. *I believe this inclusion was intentional to destroy
the US economy and force us into socialism.
Kinda seems to be a whiff of blood and gunpowder in the air but I
cannot find the source.
first of all, the WSJ is hardly an objective source. it's a cheering
section for the folks who got us into this mess in the first place
further, it's their goal to oppose ANY provisions which level the
playing field in favor of the middle class. one person has called the
"WSJ" 'quaintly reactionary'. and it is.
Ad hominem argument.
said the only man in america who doesn't know the political
orientation of the WSJ.
hint: it aint the 'pennysaver'.
The WSJ, Forbes, Investors...et cetera, all push the extreme right wing
position at all times.

Meanwhile, Obama gives $2 billion to an oil company in Brazil whose
main shareholder is ..........George Soros. *This is while the Dems
forbid offshore drilling here.

It's far from the quick fix some on the right think it is, nor is it a
guarantee of oil independency

But it provides greater latitude and mobility.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
* * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

It is amusing to hear from people who think Daily Kos is "Fair and
balanced".

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:27:51 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Aug 25, 1:24*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:21:36 -0400, NotNow wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 25, 12:35 pm, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 11:13 am, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:54:16 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
On Aug 25, 10:27 am, Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 25, 10:21 am, Frogwatch wrote:
Are you sure you want a bill with this provision to pass?http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57435888264288...
I do not think including this was an accident but was intentional. *If
this passes, ALL small businesses, the driver of our economy will be
forced to close because we all make mistakes and will be fined the
maximum amount. *I believe this inclusion was intentional to destroy
the US economy and force us into socialism.
Kinda seems to be a whiff of blood and gunpowder in the air but I
cannot find the source.
first of all, the WSJ is hardly an objective source. it's a cheering
section for the folks who got us into this mess in the first place
further, it's their goal to oppose ANY provisions which level the
playing field in favor of the middle class. one person has called the
"WSJ" 'quaintly reactionary'. and it is.
Ad hominem argument.
said the only man in america who doesn't know the political
orientation of the WSJ.
hint: it aint the 'pennysaver'.
The WSJ, Forbes, Investors...et cetera, all push the extreme right wing
position at all times.

Meanwhile, Obama gives $2 billion to an oil company in Brazil whose
main shareholder is ..........George Soros. *This is while the Dems
forbid offshore drilling here.

It's far from the quick fix some on the right think it is, nor is it a
guarantee of oil independency

But it provides greater latitude and mobility.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
* * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

It is amusing to hear from people who think Daily Kos is "Fair and
balanced".

And Daily Kos, Huffpo, and Michael Moore should all be commissioned to
write the history books for our youngsters...

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 25, 1:24 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:21:36 -0400, NotNow wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 25, 12:35 pm, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 11:13 am, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:54:16 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
On Aug 25, 10:27 am, Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 25, 10:21 am, Frogwatch wrote:
Are you sure you want a bill with this provision to pass?http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57435888264288...
I do not think including this was an accident but was intentional. If
this passes, ALL small businesses, the driver of our economy will be
forced to close because we all make mistakes and will be fined the
maximum amount. I believe this inclusion was intentional to destroy
the US economy and force us into socialism.
Kinda seems to be a whiff of blood and gunpowder in the air but I
cannot find the source.
first of all, the WSJ is hardly an objective source. it's a cheering
section for the folks who got us into this mess in the first place
further, it's their goal to oppose ANY provisions which level the
playing field in favor of the middle class. one person has called the
"WSJ" 'quaintly reactionary'. and it is.
Ad hominem argument.
said the only man in america who doesn't know the political
orientation of the WSJ.
hint: it aint the 'pennysaver'.
The WSJ, Forbes, Investors...et cetera, all push the extreme right wing
position at all times.
Meanwhile, Obama gives $2 billion to an oil company in Brazil whose
main shareholder is ..........George Soros. This is while the Dems
forbid offshore drilling here.
It's far from the quick fix some on the right think it is, nor is it a
guarantee of oil independency
But it provides greater latitude and mobility.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

It is amusing to hear from people who think Daily Kos is "Fair and
balanced".

Almost as amusing as people thinking that Fox News is "Fair and balanced".

NotNow wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 25, 12:35 pm, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 25, 11:13 am, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:54:16 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:
On Aug 25, 10:27 am, Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 25, 10:21 am, Frogwatch wrote:
Are you sure you want a bill with this provision to
pass?http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57435888264288...

I do not think including this was an accident but was
intentional. If
this passes, ALL small businesses, the driver of our economy will be
forced to close because we all make mistakes and will be fined the
maximum amount. I believe this inclusion was intentional to destroy
the US economy and force us into socialism.
Kinda seems to be a whiff of blood and gunpowder in the air but I
cannot find the source.
first of all, the WSJ is hardly an objective source. it's a cheering
section for the folks who got us into this mess in the first place
further, it's their goal to oppose ANY provisions which level the
playing field in favor of the middle class. one person has called the
"WSJ" 'quaintly reactionary'. and it is.
Ad hominem argument.
said the only man in america who doesn't know the political
orientation of the WSJ.
hint: it aint the 'pennysaver'.
The WSJ, Forbes, Investors...et cetera, all push the extreme right wing
position at all times.

Meanwhile, Obama gives $2 billion to an oil company in Brazil whose
main shareholder is ..........George Soros. This is while the Dems
forbid offshore drilling here.

It's far from the quick fix some on the right think it is, nor is it a
guarantee of oil independency

Drilling in our own oil fields will keep the money we spend on oil
within the US. It will also reduce the need for tankers to traverse the
waters where pirates are known to operate.

Drilling in our own oil fields has many benefits.

"BAR" wrote in message
...
Drilling in our own oil fields will keep the money we spend on oil within
the US. It will also reduce the need for tankers to traverse the waters
where pirates are known to operate.

Nope. It's a global oil market. Econ 101.

Only a tiny, tiny percentage of tankers have a problem with pirates. Of
course, if you even took 5 minutes to check, you would find the facts.

--
Nom=de=Plume