wf3h wrote:
On Aug 28, 8:58 am, H the K wrote:

Most thinking people realize it is going to take Obama years to clean up
the messes left by his predecessor.-

seems the right thinks he should have had it cleared up by 12:05 on
jan. 20. and they bitch about EVERYTHING he does...


The reality, which the Repubs are working so hard to deny:

Every single issue and problem this country faces is the result of
nonfeasance, malfeasance, and misfeasance on the part of the Bush
Administration.

All the GOP has to sell these days is fear.

Imagine how sad your situation is when your "salesmen" are the likes of
JustWait, herring, jackoff, lu-ser, and the rest of the aging white
trash that makes up the majority of the right here.

H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 28, 8:52 am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:

do you also blame the police officer for arresting the criminal, or
the surgeon for cutting out a cancer?
One of the definitions of blame is appropriate. Yes, I hold
responsible
the police officer for arresting the criminal and I hold
responsible the
surgeon for cutting out a cancer.-

well i guess one should never expect too much from redneck logic.


You're expecting intelligence from someone who couldn't get into
college, joined the marines, and was so good at that, he never got an
overseas posting?

Harry at least my name is on the title to my house. How much does
Karen charge you for rent each month?



Ahhh...I see you are still Mr. Simple-Minded.

Why didn't Karen let you put your name on the title to the house?

BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 28, 8:52 am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:

do you also blame the police officer for arresting the criminal, or
the surgeon for cutting out a cancer?
One of the definitions of blame is appropriate. Yes, I hold
responsible
the police officer for arresting the criminal and I hold
responsible the
surgeon for cutting out a cancer.-

well i guess one should never expect too much from redneck logic.


You're expecting intelligence from someone who couldn't get into
college, joined the marines, and was so good at that, he never got
an overseas posting?

Harry at least my name is on the title to my house. How much does
Karen charge you for rent each month?



Ahhh...I see you are still Mr. Simple-Minded.

Why didn't Karen let you put your name on the title to the house?


I see you are still Mr. Simple-Minded.

BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 28, 8:52 am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:

do you also blame the police officer for arresting the criminal, or
the surgeon for cutting out a cancer?
One of the definitions of blame is appropriate. Yes, I hold
responsible
the police officer for arresting the criminal and I hold
responsible the
surgeon for cutting out a cancer.-

well i guess one should never expect too much from redneck logic.


You're expecting intelligence from someone who couldn't get into
college, joined the marines, and was so good at that, he never got
an overseas posting?

Harry at least my name is on the title to my house. How much does
Karen charge you for rent each month?



Ahhh...I see you are still Mr. Simple-Minded.

Why didn't Karen let you put your name on the title to the house?

If you were her..why would she?

D 2 wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 28, 8:52 am, BAR wrote:
wf3h wrote:

do you also blame the police officer for arresting the
criminal, or
the surgeon for cutting out a cancer?
One of the definitions of blame is appropriate. Yes, I hold
responsible
the police officer for arresting the criminal and I hold
responsible the
surgeon for cutting out a cancer.-

well i guess one should never expect too much from redneck logic.


You're expecting intelligence from someone who couldn't get into
college, joined the marines, and was so good at that, he never got
an overseas posting?

Harry at least my name is on the title to my house. How much does
Karen charge you for rent each month?



Ahhh...I see you are still Mr. Simple-Minded.

Why didn't Karen let you put your name on the title to the house?

If you were her..why would she?
True dat!

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Aug 27, 1:02 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message


Both parties are guilty. And things are not improving. With the current
administration spending like a drunken sailor,

as did the previous administration

Reply:
So it is OK to over spend now?-

so it's OK to blame only obama?

I already blamed both parties. Obama is taking the spending to another even
higher level. And the jobs are still disappearing. The numbers may be
slowing, but that is most likely because the number of jobs has shrunk a
lot.

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Aug 27, 3:34 pm, JLH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:39:27 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 27, 1:02 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

Both parties are guilty. And things are not improving. With the
current
administration spending like a drunken sailor,

as did the previous administration

Reply:
So it is OK to over spend now?-

so it's OK to blame only obama?

Yo NomDePlume - *This* is an example of using the 'Bush Rationale'.
--


hmmm...seems an 'obama' rationale is fine but god forbid the guy who
actually screwed up the economy should get the blame.

Reply:
And that guy would be? Bush, Clinton, Bush1. and on back a ways.

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Aug 27, 1:02 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message


Both parties are guilty. And things are not improving. With the current
administration spending like a drunken sailor,

as did the previous administration

Reply:
So it is OK to over spend now?-

so it's OK to blame only obama?

I already blamed both parties. Obama is taking the spending to another
even higher level. And the jobs are still disappearing. The numbers may
be slowing, but that is most likely because the number of jobs has shrunk
a lot.

And because the people who are no longer seeking work because they have
given up and those whose unemployment has run out are not being counted.

Steve

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Aug 27, 3:34 pm, JLH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:39:27 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 27, 1:02 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

Both parties are guilty. And things are not improving. With the
current
administration spending like a drunken sailor,

as did the previous administration

Reply:
So it is OK to over spend now?-

so it's OK to blame only obama?

Yo NomDePlume - *This* is an example of using the 'Bush Rationale'.
--


hmmm...seems an 'obama' rationale is fine but god forbid the guy who
actually screwed up the economy should get the blame.

Reply:
And that guy would be? Bush, Clinton, Bush1. and on back a ways.

I am going to have to do the math. What has Obama spent in less than a year
compared to what Bush spent in four?

Class?

Class? (Imagine Ben Stein's voiceover.)

Steve

"SteveB" wrote in message
...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Aug 27, 3:34 pm, JLH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:39:27 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 27, 1:02 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

Both parties are guilty. And things are not improving. With the
current
administration spending like a drunken sailor,

as did the previous administration

Reply:
So it is OK to over spend now?-

so it's OK to blame only obama?

Yo NomDePlume - *This* is an example of using the 'Bush Rationale'.
--


hmmm...seems an 'obama' rationale is fine but god forbid the guy who
actually screwed up the economy should get the blame.

Reply:
And that guy would be? Bush, Clinton, Bush1. and on back a ways.

I am going to have to do the math. What has Obama spent in less than a
year compared to what Bush spent in four?

Class?

Class? (Imagine Ben Stein's voiceover.)


Obama is not in charge of spending. That would be Congress.

--
Nom=de=Plume