On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:33:02 -0400, H the K
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JustWait" wrote in message
...
You have been so accused unless you actually have a source.
Here you go ****wad...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0

Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go ****
yourself...

So, you are lying. At least provided proof.

You think so?

http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf

Read the whole thing. That's the model.

Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy
for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with
limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent
of euthenasia.

And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly,
consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA
increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up
by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to
those who are dependant on SSI over two years.

Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars.

COLA is pegged to increases in the COL. Got it?

Like I said Bone Brain - get yourself edumacated.

COLA has been canceled for SSI/SSD for the next two years.

http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/24/soc...ton-index.html

Medicare is scheduled to go up 3% and 5% over the next two years.

That's a net loss of 8% anyway you slice it. Which means that SSI/SSD
reciepients will actually return to 2006 payment levels.

I know math is hard for you Liberals, but this is pretty easy to
understand - even for you.