On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:31:45 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 21, 12:50*am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:53:51 -0700, Jim wrote:
SteveB wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
SteveB wrote:
I think so, and want to be a poster child. *If health care were in the
state they want it to be during the last ten years, I would have been
dead nine. One of those who are too old to be worth the trouble and
expense.

Steve
Sorry to tell you, but no matter what Sara Palin told you, that death
panel thing isn't true.

Can't tell when you are being manipulated?

Well, if this thing is approved, let's just keep count of how many five way
bypasses and aortic valve replacements there are. *Nothing like reality to
keep things straight. *My heart surgery was near $200k. *I doubt that would
have been covered under Obama.

And yes, I can tell when I'm being manipulated, so .......... plonk.

Steve

You can join Frogwatch and John H, Plonk back. *I was hoping you would
back up your accusations, but innuendo and speculation is all you have.

Trying to talk to you is like arguing with the dining room table.

I warned you. *He's dumb as a stump. *At least a dining room table has
some style to it. *Steve can't handle having his assumptions tested.

What makes him think his aortic procedure wasn't going to be covered
by Obamacare? *If my father would have required it earlier this year,
it would have been covered by Medicare. *

These idiots don't have a clue nor do they care to. *As I said
earlier, they use the malarky to excite their pre-determined
prejudices.

i love the assumptions these morons make. they assume the only
healthcare that would be covered is euthanasia.

....and abortions, for sure. Or is Obama changing the name to
'reproductive care'?
--

John H

"My reading of history convinces me that most bad government
results from too much government."

Thomas Jefferson