|
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
nom=de=plume wrote:
"JustWait" wrote in message ... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. JustWait touts himself as a network/internet guru, but he can't figure out how to set up an email/newsgroup reader. What he is...is unemployable. |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "JustWait" wrote in message ... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. You think so? http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf Read the whole thing. That's the model. Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent of euthenasia. And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly, consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to those who are dependant on SSI over two years. Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars. |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
nom=de=plume wrote:
"JustWait" wrote in message ... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. You would be right if he said anything like you are trying to say he did at 1:48. He did not. He did not say the words "Death panels," until 2:31, where he actually said, "Some how it's gotten spun into 'death panels,' which I'm not in favor of." You are lacking something if you think you said anything here other than try to leave a smoke screen. |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
H the K wrote:
JustWait wrote: In article , says... H the K wrote: JustWait wrote: I am not a liar, and have never been accused of such here by anybody who is listening. Liar, liar, pants on fire. No source, he's a liar. He's one of the people I blocked, so if he were to show a creditable source, I'd never know unless someone responds to him. I'll bet he does not have a CREDITABLE source. That makes him a LIAR. You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Uh, **** you... Name calling is what people do when they can't support their firmly held position, in the face of facts that don't fit. |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
Jim wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: "JustWait" wrote in message ... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. You would be right if he said anything like you are trying to say he did at 1:48. He did not. He did not say the words "Death panels," until 2:31, where he actually said, "Some how it's gotten spun into 'death panels,' which I'm not in favor of." You are lacking something if you think you said anything here other than try to leave a smoke screen. Now, it's been spun into "death books" by the low-brain-output types. |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "JustWait" wrote in message ... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. You think so? http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf Read the whole thing. That's the model. Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent of euthenasia. And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly, consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to those who are dependant on SSI over two years. Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars. COLA is pegged to increases in the COL. Got it? |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:33:02 -0400, H the K
wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "JustWait" wrote in message ... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. You think so? http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf Read the whole thing. That's the model. Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent of euthenasia. And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly, consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to those who are dependant on SSI over two years. Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars. COLA is pegged to increases in the COL. Got it? Like I said Bone Brain - get yourself edumacated. COLA has been canceled for SSI/SSD for the next two years. http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/24/soc...ton-index.html Medicare is scheduled to go up 3% and 5% over the next two years. That's a net loss of 8% anyway you slice it. Which means that SSI/SSD reciepients will actually return to 2006 payment levels. I know math is hard for you Liberals, but this is pretty easy to understand - even for you. |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
In article ,
says... On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:33:02 -0400, H the K wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "JustWait" wrote in message ... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. You think so? http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf Read the whole thing. That's the model. Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent of euthenasia. And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly, consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to those who are dependant on SSI over two years. Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars. COLA is pegged to increases in the COL. Got it? Like I said Bone Brain - get yourself edumacated. COLA has been canceled for SSI/SSD for the next two years. http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/24/soc...ton-index.html Medicare is scheduled to go up 3% and 5% over the next two years. That's a net loss of 8% anyway you slice it. Which means that SSI/SSD reciepients will actually return to 2006 payment levels. I know math is hard for you Liberals, but this is pretty easy to understand - even for you. It's easy... [Tools} [Rules] [Add] {type in "H the K") [enter]... finished business... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
PAGING DR. OBAMA! ER STAT!
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:33:02 -0400, H the K wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:10:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "JustWait" wrote in message ... You have been so accused unless you actually have a source. Here you go ****wad... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JrHqrumOI0 Pay particular attention to about 1 min 48 sec... And oh yeah, go **** yourself... So, you are lying. At least provided proof. You think so? http://www.ethics.va.gov/YLYC/YLYC_F...n_20001001.pdf Read the whole thing. That's the model. Also, note the principle author - Robert Pearlman, MD - the poster boy for "rationed" health care and cost effectiveness for those with limited health spans, a sponsor of the Hemlock Society and a proponent of euthenasia. And if you don't think that the President is after seniors/elderly, consider this - Social Security is not going to be giving out COLA increases for the next two years - yet, Medicare payments are going up by 3% the first year and 5% the following year - a net loss of 8% to those who are dependant on SSI over two years. Get yourself edumacated before you call people liars. COLA is pegged to increases in the COL. Got it? Like I said Bone Brain - get yourself edumacated. COLA has been canceled for SSI/SSD for the next two years. http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/24/soc...ton-index.html Medicare is scheduled to go up 3% and 5% over the next two years. That's a net loss of 8% anyway you slice it. Which means that SSI/SSD reciepients will actually return to 2006 payment levels. I know math is hard for you Liberals, but this is pretty easy to understand - even for you. It's easy... [Tools} [Rules] [Add] {type in "H the K") [enter]... finished business... There you go, Conservatives = intelligent Liberals = stupid. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com