On Aug 20, 8:36*pm, Tim wrote:
On Aug 20, 6:22*am, wf3h wrote:



On Aug 20, 6:52*am, BAR wrote:

Tim wrote:
On Aug 19, 7:08 pm, wf3h wrote:
On Aug 19, 3:54 pm, H the K wrote:

wf3h wrote:
On Aug 19, 3:00 pm, wrote:
?? the right used to believe all blacks were inferior, women belonged
in the home, barefoot and pregnant....
and you're telling us about the failures of the left?
Used to believe?
yeah, my mistake. the GOP has invented code words for homophobia,
misogyny, racism, but it's still the party of hate

"invented code words??"

Like what?

Would someone please send me a copy of that memo. You would think that
if you pay your GOP dues and you put the GOP supplied bumper stickers on
your car you would get the GOP code words list.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

try 'traditional family values'. that's good for starters

That's republican *code?

I remember John Kerry *occasionally using that phrase when he was
making his presidential bid

and i don't. sorry

i suggest, however, you look up 'focus on the family' and see how
often the phrase comes up. since you're obviously uneducated on the
issue, start with 'wikipedia'. they have a decent introduction to the
concept

On Aug 20, 9:47*am, wf3h wrote:
On Aug 19, 10:50*pm, TopBassDog wrote:



On Aug 19, 10:50 pm, TopBassDog wrote:
On Aug 19, 2:49 pm, wrote:

On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:40:23 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 19, 3:00 pm, wrote:

Another hasty generalization. *Everyone is prone to positing the
occasional informal fallacy. *The Left does it so well, though. *One
could say the Left is almost clinical in its employ of the "hasty
generalization," along with the other fallacies they have no scruples
about submitting. *Just watching Chris Matthews for one evening should
bring this fact to bear.

?? the right used to believe all blacks were inferior, women belonged
in the home, barefoot and pregnant....

and you're telling us about the failures of the left?

"...used to believe..."? *Are you sure that you want to stay with this
choice of wording?

(Actually, I can construct your propaganda for you. *I have some
experience in writing fiction. *I charge by the hour, though.)

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
* * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Hmph.

I perceive that wf3h attacks the Bourgeoisie only because he's not,
nor shall he ever be a member of the Third Estate.

The poor, wee proletariat.

methinks topassdog doesn't know what the bourgeosie or the 3rd estate
is...let alone how to define who belongs to it.

it's called being a 'poseur'...

Read my words again. The bourgeoisie shall never be a member of the
Third Estate for that is where you dwell. Always envious of those who
may have more than you. Always believing it is a mortal sin to have
more than you.

Not only are you a proletariat, but also "Les Jaloux."

Really, if you don't have a "La Colombe Qui Fait Boum!" on your living
room wall, you really should get one. It fits you well.

On Aug 20, 12:28*pm, H the K wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:15:32 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:

I'm not required currently to ensconce myself in the "system," for the
most part. *That is one of the benefits of personal liberty. *But
then, too, your conditional statement is far from being representative
of reality. *I suspect that no one would be able to convince you
otherwise, though.

I don't read more than a post or two of yours a day, but I have to tell
you, your strained, overwritten and usually purple prose reminds me of
the bloody awful scribblings some of the students I was forced to
"teach" in bonehead English many years ago produced when I was earning
my M.A.

Usenet is for informal writing. Those who are capable should use their
best spelling and grammar, but there's no need to write here as if your
rectal opening were in full pucker.

You are right, though. *I should be talking boat stuff, not rendering
philosophical perspectives. *Afterall, this is rec.boats, right?

See, you do have a sense of humor. *This* hasn't been rec.boats for years..

Herr Krause.

We know you make sure that it shall not return.

On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:44:32 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog
wrote:

On Aug 20, 12:28*pm, H the K wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:15:32 -0400, H the K
wrote:

wrote:

I'm not required currently to ensconce myself in the "system," for the
most part. *That is one of the benefits of personal liberty. *But
then, too, your conditional statement is far from being representative
of reality. *I suspect that no one would be able to convince you
otherwise, though.

I don't read more than a post or two of yours a day, but I have to tell
you, your strained, overwritten and usually purple prose reminds me of
the bloody awful scribblings some of the students I was forced to
"teach" in bonehead English many years ago produced when I was earning
my M.A.

Usenet is for informal writing. Those who are capable should use their
best spelling and grammar, but there's no need to write here as if your
rectal opening were in full pucker.

You are right, though. *I should be talking boat stuff, not rendering
philosophical perspectives. *Afterall, this is rec.boats, right?

See, you do have a sense of humor. *This* hasn't been rec.boats for years.

Herr Krause.

We know you make sure that it shall not return.

It might be (and there's strong evidence for it) that he's confused
the "rec" in "rec.boats" as an abbreviation for "rectal."

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access