On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:32:47 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:01:05 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 13, 5:53*pm, JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...





On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:42:14 -0400, NotNow wrote:

wf3h wrote:
On Aug 13, 7:28 am, JLH wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:22:21 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 13, 7:13 am, JLH wrote:
Well, I'm part owner of a couple, and I don't consider myself
'wealthy' (in the material sense, that is).
--
yeah so am i. i own about 10 shares of goldman sachs in my 401k
portfolio. big shwoop.
Then quit ****ing and moaning about the owners being wealthy (in the
material sense, of course).

ROFLMAO!! why? do you think that having had the big boys raid my 401k
to maintain their lifestyles makes me rich? you right wingers have
quite an imagination.
Oh, and quit calling names and hurling personal insults. They don't
help your arguments. Krause has been doing it for years. Hasn't helped
him at all.
--
?? now let's see...the right invents lies such as obama putting people
in concentration camps, forming death panels, etc.

THEN when they get called on it, they moan they're being treated
unfairly...

You are correct! The lies about the death panel crap that is coming from
the right is dishonest, and they know it, that is IF they read that part.

From page 429:

??(B) An advance care planning consultation with re2
spect to an individual may be conducted more frequently
3 than provided under paragraph (1) if there is a significant
4 change in the health condition of the individual, including
5 diagnosis of a chronic, progressive, life-limiting disease, a
6 life-threatening or terminal diagnosis or life-threatening
7 injury, or upon admission to a skilled nursing facility, a
8 long-term care facility (as defined by the Secretary), or
9 a hospice program.
10 ??(4) A consultation under this subsection may in11
clude the formulation of an order regarding life sustaining
12 treatment or a similar order.
13 ??(5)(A) For purposes of this section, the term ?order
14 regarding life sustaining treatment? means, with respect
15 to an individual, an actionable medical order relating to
16 the treatment of that individual that?

Note line 10. Pretty scary, huh? Why is this here?

??(iii) A program for orders for life sustaining
16 treatment for a States described in this clause is a
17 program that?

some lines snipped...

5 ??(IV) is guided by a coalition of stake
6holders includes representatives from emergency
7 medical services, emergency department physi8
cians or nurses, state long-term care associa9
tion, state medical association, state surveyors,
10 agency responsible for senior services, state de11
partment of health, state hospital association,
12 home health association, state bar association,
13 and state hospice association.

Sure sounds like a panel, doesn't it?

Yup... It is what it is. Hey, if they like the bill they should admit
what it is and support it. Don't look at the word "black" on the paper
and call it "white"... * *Either way, gotta' go do the pool...


i laugh at the right wing. they've never had to care for the dying but
they oppose any effort to do so.

Do you really believe that the friends and relatives of right wing
folks don't die?

Gosh, I could have sworn both my mother, father, and first wife had
died, after several months or years of illness.

I suppose I was wrong.



You are sounding more like Harry by the day. That comment above sounds
like something he'd say. Do you also equate killing babies with
executing murderers?

Just plonked the guy.. He is worse than harry, with the name calling and
out of context bull****...

Yeah but he gave us a quote worth repeating:

"i laugh at the right wing. they've never had to care for the dying
but they oppose any effort to do so. '

Right wingers' friends and relatives don't die, you know. This guy is
giving Donnie a run for his money, and I don't think this guy is just
pretending.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.