Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:03:52 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:10:59 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: jps wrote: Feel like you're working a lot harder these days, putting in longer hours for the same pay - or even less? The latest round of government data on worker productivity indicates that you probably are. The Labor Department said Tuesday that the American work force produced, at an annual rate, 6.4 percent more of the goods they made and services they provided in the second quarter of this year compared to a year ago. At the same time, "unit labor costs" - the amount employers paid for all that extra work - fell by 5.8 percent. The jump in productivity was higher than expected; the cut in labor costs more than double expectations. That is, despite the deep job cuts of the past year, workers who remain on the payroll are filling in and making up the work that had been done by their departed colleagues. In some cases, that extra work came with a smaller paycheck. Full story here... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32374533...n_the_economy/ On todays production lines the volume can be increased without a corresponding increase in the effort of the individual. So a 6.4% increase in production does not mean that the employee is being overworked as implied. Don't know if you're heard, we don't have production lines here anymore. We're in the service business and military arms. The productivity gains come from less workers doing more, working longer hours for pay that doesn't keep up with the rising cost of living. No production, so we could not raise productivity. You kept all your deadwood. You don't have to produce on a line to be productive. We write software, it doesn't benefit from a faster production line. We are doing more with less people. When times are lean, that's the way it works. Did you ever work for an entreprenurial company or only behemoths? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jps wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:03:52 -0700, "CalifBill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:10:59 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: jps wrote: Feel like you're working a lot harder these days, putting in longer hours for the same pay - or even less? The latest round of government data on worker productivity indicates that you probably are. The Labor Department said Tuesday that the American work force produced, at an annual rate, 6.4 percent more of the goods they made and services they provided in the second quarter of this year compared to a year ago. At the same time, "unit labor costs" - the amount employers paid for all that extra work - fell by 5.8 percent. The jump in productivity was higher than expected; the cut in labor costs more than double expectations. That is, despite the deep job cuts of the past year, workers who remain on the payroll are filling in and making up the work that had been done by their departed colleagues. In some cases, that extra work came with a smaller paycheck. Full story here... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32374533...n_the_economy/ On todays production lines the volume can be increased without a corresponding increase in the effort of the individual. So a 6.4% increase in production does not mean that the employee is being overworked as implied. Don't know if you're heard, we don't have production lines here anymore. We're in the service business and military arms. The productivity gains come from less workers doing more, working longer hours for pay that doesn't keep up with the rising cost of living. No production, so we could not raise productivity. You kept all your deadwood. You don't have to produce on a line to be productive. We write software, it doesn't benefit from a faster production line. We are doing more with less people. When times are lean, that's the way it works. Did you ever work for an entreprenurial company or only behemoths? How well are those German screwdrivers helping you write software? |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keith Nuttle wrote:
On todays production lines the volume can be increased without a corresponding increase in the effort of the individual. Todays production lines? What percentage of GDP do you think that represents? |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 11, 9:07*pm, jps wrote:
Feel like you’re working a lot harder these days, putting in longer hours for the same pay — or even less? The latest round of government data on worker productivity indicates that you probably are. The Labor Department said Tuesday that the American work force produced, at an annual rate, 6.4 percent more of the goods they made and services they provided in the second quarter of this year compared to a year ago. At the same time, “unit labor costs” — the amount employers paid for all that extra work — fell by 5.8 percent. The jump in productivity was higher than expected; the cut in labor costs more than double expectations. That is, despite the deep job cuts of the past year, workers who remain on the payroll are filling in and making up the work that had been done by their departed colleagues. In some cases, that extra work came with a smaller paycheck. Full story here...http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32374533...n_the_economy/ somebody has to take care of the rich. god knows they've suffered, what with all the wall street problems. we middle class folks will muddle through but our first obligation, before family, before self, before anything...is to care for the rich |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 11, 9:07 pm, jps wrote: Feel like you’re working a lot harder these days, putting in longer hours for the same pay — or even less? The latest round of government data on worker productivity indicates that you probably are. The Labor Department said Tuesday that the American work force produced, at an annual rate, 6.4 percent more of the goods they made and services they provided in the second quarter of this year compared to a year ago. At the same time, “unit labor costs” — the amount employers paid for all that extra work — fell by 5.8 percent. The jump in productivity was higher than expected; the cut in labor costs more than double expectations. That is, despite the deep job cuts of the past year, workers who remain on the payroll are filling in and making up the work that had been done by their departed colleagues. In some cases, that extra work came with a smaller paycheck. Full story here...http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32374533...n_the_economy/ somebody has to take care of the rich. god knows they've suffered, what with all the wall street problems. we middle class folks will muddle through but our first obligation, before family, before self, before anything...is to care for the rich I'd rather their heads on pikes. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 11, 9:12*pm, wf3h wrote:
On Aug 11, 9:07*pm, jps wrote: Feel like you’re working a lot harder these days, putting in longer hours for the same pay — or even less? The latest round of government data on worker productivity indicates that you probably are. The Labor Department said Tuesday that the American work force produced, at an annual rate, 6.4 percent more of the goods they made and services they provided in the second quarter of this year compared to a year ago. At the same time, “unit labor costs” — the amount employers paid for all that extra work — fell by 5.8 percent. The jump in productivity was higher than expected; the cut in labor costs more than double expectations. That is, despite the deep job cuts of the past year, workers who remain on the payroll are filling in and making up the work that had been done by their departed colleagues. In some cases, that extra work came with a smaller paycheck. Full story here...http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32374533...n_the_economy/ somebody has to take care of the rich. god knows they've suffered, what with all the wall street problems. we middle class folks will muddle through but our first obligation, before family, before self, before anything...is to care for the rich Be glad there's rich people, otherwise you couldn't afford that boat you just bought , Very first Lincoln Mrk VII LSC I bought was in '93 from an eye surgeon. He had depreciated it out. it had 85,000 mi on it, all available options- sun roof. Beautiful! Still had the original window price sheet in the glove box of $36,852.00 we got it for $6500.00! I told the wife, I was thankful for "rich people" who like to throw stuff away...... |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 12, 7:10*am, Tim wrote:
On Aug 11, 9:12*pm, wf3h wrote: On Aug 11, 9:07*pm, jps wrote: Feel like you’re working a lot harder these days, putting in longer hours for the same pay — or even less? The latest round of government data on worker productivity indicates that you probably are. The Labor Department said Tuesday that the American work force produced, at an annual rate, 6.4 percent more of the goods they made and services they provided in the second quarter of this year compared to a year ago. At the same time, “unit labor costs” — the amount employers paid for all that extra work — fell by 5.8 percent. The jump in productivity was higher than expected; the cut in labor costs more than double expectations. That is, despite the deep job cuts of the past year, workers who remain on the payroll are filling in and making up the work that had been done by their departed colleagues. In some cases, that extra work came with a smaller paycheck. Full story here...http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32374533...n_the_economy/ somebody has to take care of the rich. god knows they've suffered, what with all the wall street problems. we middle class folks will muddle through but our first obligation, before family, before self, before anything...is to care for the rich Be glad there's rich people, otherwise you couldn't afford that boat you just bought , yeah that's what they tell us, isn't it? and they deserve to be rich, regardless of what they do, don't they? they trash the economic system; we pay for it. they trash their companies; we pay for it. no matter what they do, we should grovel before them and thank them for being rich, no matter what it costs us. and we should be thankful there are people like you to remind us what a privilege it is to serve rich people, no matter what they do. serfs are always needed to carry the slop buckets and they should be glad for the work you kill me, you know that? |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 12, 7:10 am, Tim wrote: On Aug 11, 9:12 pm, wf3h wrote: On Aug 11, 9:07 pm, jps wrote: Feel like you’re working a lot harder these days, putting in longer hours for the same pay — or even less? The latest round of government data on worker productivity indicates that you probably are. The Labor Department said Tuesday that the American work force produced, at an annual rate, 6.4 percent more of the goods they made and services they provided in the second quarter of this year compared to a year ago. At the same time, “unit labor costs” — the amount employers paid for all that extra work — fell by 5.8 percent. The jump in productivity was higher than expected; the cut in labor costs more than double expectations. That is, despite the deep job cuts of the past year, workers who remain on the payroll are filling in and making up the work that had been done by their departed colleagues. In some cases, that extra work came with a smaller paycheck. Full story here...http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32374533...n_the_economy/ somebody has to take care of the rich. god knows they've suffered, what with all the wall street problems. we middle class folks will muddle through but our first obligation, before family, before self, before anything...is to care for the rich Be glad there's rich people, otherwise you couldn't afford that boat you just bought , yeah that's what they tell us, isn't it? and they deserve to be rich, regardless of what they do, don't they? they trash the economic system; we pay for it. they trash their companies; we pay for it. no matter what they do, we should grovel before them and thank them for being rich, no matter what it costs us. and we should be thankful there are people like you to remind us what a privilege it is to serve rich people, no matter what they do. serfs are always needed to carry the slop buckets and they should be glad for the work you kill me, you know that? You never know when a crumb might fall from the table of the rich and you'll get to drive it. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 12, 7:39*am, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote: On Aug 12, 7:10 am, Tim wrote: On Aug 11, 9:12 pm, wf3h wrote: On Aug 11, 9:07 pm, jps wrote: Feel like you’re working a lot harder these days, putting in longer hours for the same pay — or even less? The latest round of government data on worker productivity indicates that you probably are. The Labor Department said Tuesday that the American work force produced, at an annual rate, 6.4 percent more of the goods they made and services they provided in the second quarter of this year compared to a year ago. At the same time, “unit labor costs” — the amount employers paid for all that extra work — fell by 5.8 percent. The jump in productivity was higher than expected; the cut in labor costs more than double expectations. That is, despite the deep job cuts of the past year, workers who remain on the payroll are filling in and making up the work that had been done by their departed colleagues. In some cases, that extra work came with a smaller paycheck. Full story here...http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32374533...n_the_economy/ somebody has to take care of the rich. god knows they've suffered, what with all the wall street problems. we middle class folks will muddle through but our first obligation, before family, before self, before anything...is to care for the rich Be glad there's rich people, otherwise you couldn't afford that boat you just bought , yeah that's what they tell us, isn't it? and they deserve to be rich, regardless of what they do, don't they? they trash the economic system; we pay for it. they trash their companies; we pay for it. no matter what they do, we should grovel before them and thank them for being rich, no matter what it costs us. and we should be thankful there are people like you to remind us what a privilege it is to serve rich people, no matter what they do. serfs are always needed to carry the slop buckets and they should be glad for the work you kill me, you know that? You never know when a crumb might fall from the table of the rich and you'll get to drive it. And it was a very delicious crum indeed! |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 12, 7:36*am, wf3h wrote:
On Aug 12, 7:10*am, Tim wrote: On Aug 11, 9:12*pm, wf3h wrote: On Aug 11, 9:07*pm, jps wrote: Feel like you’re working a lot harder these days, putting in longer hours for the same pay — or even less? The latest round of government data on worker productivity indicates that you probably are. The Labor Department said Tuesday that the American work force produced, at an annual rate, 6.4 percent more of the goods they made and services they provided in the second quarter of this year compared to a year ago. At the same time, “unit labor costs” — the amount employers paid for all that extra work — fell by 5.8 percent. The jump in productivity was higher than expected; the cut in labor costs more than double expectations. That is, despite the deep job cuts of the past year, workers who remain on the payroll are filling in and making up the work that had been done by their departed colleagues. In some cases, that extra work came with a smaller paycheck. Full story here...http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32374533...n_the_economy/ somebody has to take care of the rich. god knows they've suffered, what with all the wall street problems. we middle class folks will muddle through but our first obligation, before family, before self, before anything...is to care for the rich Be glad there's rich people, otherwise you couldn't afford that boat you just bought , yeah that's what they tell us, isn't it? and they deserve to be rich, regardless of what they do, don't they? they trash the economic system; we pay for it. they trash their companies; we pay for it. no matter what they do, we should grovel before them and thank them for being rich, no matter what it costs us. and we should be thankful there are people like you to remind us what a privilege it is to serve rich people, no matter what they do. serfs are always needed to carry the slop buckets and they should be glad for the work you kill me, you know that? I'm not saying they deserve what they have or haven't got. But they do have it. I have some very wealthy friends and I don't feel like they owe me anything. If you feel like a serf then that's your problem or privilege. and no, I wouldn't kill you. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why is finding a diesel Smart car harder? | Cruising | |||
"Short-Ships: 1944 USS Harder art.jpg 114452 bytes | Tall Ship Photos | |||
WANTED: SGC SG-2000 - - Working or Not Working | Electronics | |||
WANTED: SGC SG-2000 SSB marine radio - - Working or Not Working | ASA | |||
WANTED: SGC SG-2000 Working or Not Working | General |